• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

稀释葡萄糖酸洗必泰:一次擦洗还是两次?

Diluting chlorhexidine gluconate: one scrub or two?

作者信息

Bajaj Tarun Inder, Loh Cecilia, Borgstrom David

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Bassett Medical Center , Cooperstown, New York.

出版信息

Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2014 Oct;15(5):544-7. doi: 10.1089/sur.2012.120. Epub 2014 May 21.

DOI:10.1089/sur.2012.120
PMID:24850433
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Two percent chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) is used in preparing the skin of surgical patients. In practice, it often is diluted with saline prior to use. Whether this affects efficacy is unknown, as the manufacturer does not address dilution but does recommend scrubbing twice. We attempted to determine whether diluting CHG affects its antiseptic potency and if one scrub is as effective as two.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

To test effects of CHG dilution, 60 healthy subjects were recruited and randomized into a dilution group (20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, or 100% CHG) or a control group (saline). One area of one foot of each subject was prepared, and colony-forming units (CFU) were counted at baseline and at 10 min after preparation. In a second study, 60 subjects were again recruited. Based on the previous study, a 50% dilution was applied as the scrub. Colony-forming units were calculated at baseline and after each CHG application.

RESULTS

Baseline CFU did not differ among the dilution groups (p=0.49). Subjects in all dilution groups exhibited nearly a 100% decrease in CFU, whereas the control group exhibited an 80% decrease. These results were statistically significant (p<0.01). In the second study, the CFU values after two scrubs (mean 0.1; range 0-3) were significantly lower than after one scrub (mean 3.6, range 0-100) (p=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Diluting CHG to a concentration as low as 0.4% does not affect antiseptic efficacy. The manufacturer-recommended two scrubs is superior to one scrub at reducing skin bacterial colony counts.

摘要

背景

2%葡萄糖酸氯己定(CHG)用于外科手术患者皮肤的准备。在实际操作中,使用前常常用生理盐水稀释。由于制造商未提及稀释问题,但建议擦洗两次,所以这种稀释是否会影响其疗效尚不清楚。我们试图确定稀释CHG是否会影响其抗菌效力,以及一次擦洗是否与两次擦洗效果相同。

患者与方法

为测试CHG稀释的效果,招募了60名健康受试者,并随机分为稀释组(20%、40%、60%、80%或100%CHG)或对照组(生理盐水)。准备每位受试者一只脚的一个区域,在基线时和准备后10分钟计数菌落形成单位(CFU)。在第二项研究中,再次招募了60名受试者。根据之前的研究,采用50%稀释液进行擦洗。在基线时以及每次使用CHG后计算菌落形成单位。

结果

各稀释组的基线CFU无差异(p = 0.49)。所有稀释组的受试者CFU均下降了近100%,而对照组下降了80%。这些结果具有统计学意义(p < 0.01)。在第二项研究中,两次擦洗后的CFU值(平均0.1;范围0 - 3)显著低于一次擦洗后(平均3.6,范围0 - 100)(p = 0.02)。

结论

将CHG稀释至低至0.4%的浓度不会影响抗菌效果。制造商推荐的两次擦洗在减少皮肤细菌菌落计数方面优于一次擦洗。

相似文献

1
Diluting chlorhexidine gluconate: one scrub or two?稀释葡萄糖酸洗必泰:一次擦洗还是两次?
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2014 Oct;15(5):544-7. doi: 10.1089/sur.2012.120. Epub 2014 May 21.
2
An evaluation of five protocols for surgical handwashing in relation to skin condition and microbial counts.关于皮肤状况和微生物计数对五种外科洗手方案的评估。
J Hosp Infect. 1997 May;36(1):49-65. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(97)90090-6.
3
Comparison of the antimicrobial efficacy of povidone-iodine, povidone-iodine-ethanol and chlorhexidine gluconate-ethanol surgical scrubs.聚维酮碘、聚维酮碘 - 乙醇及葡萄糖酸氯己定 - 乙醇外科洗手剂抗菌效果的比较
Dermatology. 2006;212 Suppl 1:21-5. doi: 10.1159/000089195.
4
Evaluation of a waterless, scrubless chlorhexidine gluconate/ethanol surgical scrub for antimicrobial efficacy.对一种无水、免刷的葡萄糖酸洗必泰/乙醇手术 scrub 进行抗菌效果评估。
Am J Infect Control. 2001 Dec;29(6):377-82. doi: 10.1067/mic.2001.118842.
5
Suppression of regrowth of normal skin flora under chlorhexidine gluconate dressings applied to chlorhexidine gluconate-prepped skin.葡萄糖酸洗必泰敷料抑制葡萄糖酸洗必泰备皮后正常皮肤菌群再生。
Am J Infect Control. 2012 May;40(4):344-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.03.030. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
6
Comparative of a new and innovative 2% chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated cloth with 4% chlorhexidine gluconate as topical antiseptic for preparation of the skin prior to surgery.新型创新型2%葡萄糖酸氯己定浸渍布与4%葡萄糖酸氯己定作为术前皮肤准备局部防腐剂的比较。
Am J Infect Control. 2007 Mar;35(2):89-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2006.06.012.
7
Effects of Hand Hygiene Using 4% Chlorhexidine Gluconate or Natural Soap During Hand Rubbing Followed by Alcohol-Based 1% Chlorhexidine Gluconate Sanitizer Lotion in the Operating Room.手术室中手部揉搓后使用 4%葡萄糖酸氯己定或天然皂液,再使用含 1%葡萄糖酸氯己定的酒精基洗手液对手部进行卫生处理的效果。
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2022 Jan;11(1):1-9. doi: 10.1089/wound.2020.1352. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
8
Chlorhexidine is a better antiseptic than povidone iodine and sodium hypochlorite because of its substantive effect.洗必泰比聚维酮碘和次氯酸钠具有更好的消毒效果,因为它具有实质性的作用。
Am J Infect Control. 2013 Jul;41(7):634-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.10.002. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
9
Effect of 4% chlorhexidine gluconate predisinfection skin scrub prior to hepatectomy: a double-blinded, randomized control study.肝切除术前使用4%葡萄糖酸氯己定进行皮肤预消毒擦洗的效果:一项双盲随机对照研究。
Int Surg. 2014 Nov-Dec;99(6):787-94. doi: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-13-00179.1.
10
Antiseptic efficacies of waterless hand rub, chlorhexidine scrub, and povidone-iodine scrub in surgical settings: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.无水手部清洁剂、洗必泰刷手和聚维酮碘刷手在手术环境中的消毒效果:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Hosp Infect. 2019 Apr;101(4):370-379. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.11.012. Epub 2018 Nov 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Just add water? Chlorhexidine's antimicrobial properties are minimally affected by dilution in saline compared to water.只需加水?与水相比,氯己定在盐水中的稀释对其抗菌性能的影响较小。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020 May;30(4):613-615. doi: 10.1007/s00590-019-02609-x. Epub 2019 Dec 20.