Abu Baker Fadi, Z'cruz De La Garza Jesus Alonso, Mari Amir, Zeina Abdel-Rauf, Bishara Amani, Gal Oren, Kopelman Yael
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Affiliated to the Technion Faculty of Medicine, Hadera, Haifa, Israel.
Department of Surgery, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Affiliated to the Technion Faculty of Medicine, Hadera, Haifa, Israel.
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2019 Dec 1;2019:2507848. doi: 10.1155/2019/2507848. eCollection 2019.
Shared by certain epidemiological and etiological characteristics, diverticulosis and colorectal cancer (CRC) as well as colonic polyps has long been linked. This association was studied in several heterogeneous studies but has reported inconsistent results. Clarifying the association is clinically relevant for endoscopist awareness and potential modification of screening and surveillance intervals for diverticulosis patients.
In this retrospective single-center study, patients diagnosed with diverticulosis on colonoscopy over a 10-year period were included. Each diverticulosis patient was matched with 1 control by age, gender, setting (inpatient/outpatient), and procedure's indication. CRC and polyp detection rates were recorded and compared between the groups before and after adjustment for bowel preparation quality and exam completion. CRC location was recorded and compared between groups.
A cohort of 13680 patients (6840 patients with diverticulosis and 6840 matched controls) was included. Diverticulosis was located mainly to the sigmoid and left colon (94.4%). The CRC diagnosis rate was lower in the diverticulosis group (2% vs. 4.5%, odds ratio = 0.472, < 0.001, and 95%CI = 0.382-0.584). Moreover, location of CRC was unrelated to diverticulosis location, as more CRCs in the diverticulosis group were located proximal to the splenic flexure as compared to the control group (42.5% vs 29.5%, respectively; = 0.007). Diverticulosis, however, was associated with an increased polyp detection rate compared to controls (30.5% vs. 25.5%; odds ratio = 1.2, < 0.001, and 95%CI = 1.11-1.299).
We demonstrated that diverticulosis was not associated with an increased risk for CRC. A possible increased polyp detection rate, however, warrants further evaluation in large prospective studies.
憩室病与结直肠癌(CRC)以及结肠息肉具有某些共同的流行病学和病因学特征,长期以来它们之间一直存在关联。在多项异质性研究中对这种关联进行了探讨,但结果并不一致。明确这种关联对于内镜医师的认知以及憩室病患者筛查和监测间隔的潜在调整具有临床意义。
在这项回顾性单中心研究中,纳入了在10年期间经结肠镜检查诊断为憩室病的患者。将每位憩室病患者按年龄、性别、就诊情况(住院/门诊)和检查指征与1名对照进行匹配。记录并比较两组在调整肠道准备质量和检查完成情况前后的CRC和息肉检出率。记录并比较两组之间CRC的位置。
共纳入13680例患者(6840例憩室病患者和6840例匹配对照)。憩室病主要位于乙状结肠和左半结肠(94.4%)。憩室病组的CRC诊断率较低(2%对4.5%,优势比 = 0.472,P < 0.001,95%CI = 0.382 - 0.584)。此外,CRC的位置与憩室病位置无关,因为与对照组相比,憩室病组中更多的CRC位于脾曲近端(分别为42.5%对29.5%;P = 0.007)。然而,与对照组相比,憩室病与息肉检出率增加相关(30.5%对25.5%;优势比 = 1.2,P < 0.001,95%CI = 1.11 - 1.299)。
我们证明憩室病与CRC风险增加无关。然而,息肉检出率可能增加值得在大型前瞻性研究中进一步评估。