Suppr超能文献

在资源匮乏环境下进行肿瘤电子病历需求的发掘和优先级排序:概念映射研究。

Elicitation and prioritization of requirements for electronic health records for oncology in low resource settings: A concept mapping study.

机构信息

Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Meibergdreef 15, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Uganda Cancer Institute, Upper Mulago Hill Road, P.O. Box 3935 Kampala, Uganda.

Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Meibergdreef 15, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Med Inform. 2020 Mar;135:104055. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.104055. Epub 2019 Dec 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Understanding functional and non-functional requirements is essential to successfully implement electronic medical record (EMR) systems. Actual requirements will be different for different contexts.

OBJECTIVE

To elicit and prioritize requirements for implementing EMRs in oncology in low and middle income countries (LMICs), and to relate these to requirements from high-income countries.

PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING

Cancer care stakeholders including oncologists, general doctors, nurses, biostatisticians, information technologists, from different LMICs, were involved.

METHODS

Concept mapping was used. Statements of requirements were obtained during focus group discussions (FGDs) and interviews. Using surveys, the requirements were clustered and ranked on importance and feasibility. Data were analyzed in SPSS using agglomerative hierarchical clustering and multidimensional scaling, to create cluster maps and go-zone maps reflecting the relationships between the requirements and their prioritization.

RESULTS

Four FGD sessions, with twenty participants, were conducted. In addition, six participants were interviewed. Twenty-two participants clustered the requirements and sixty-three participants ranked them on importance and feasibility. One hundred and sixty requirement statements were generated which were reduced to sixty-four after de-duplication and merging. Nine clusters were obtained encompassing the following domains, in order of importance: Security, Conducive organization, Management/Governance, General EMR functionalities, Computer infrastructure, Data management, Usability, Oncology decision support, and Ancillary requirements. On ranking, the requirements scored between 3.74 and 4.80 on importance, and between 3.55 and 4.46 on feasibility, on a 5-point Likert scale. We generated concept maps for use when communicating with stakeholders.

CONCLUSION

For oncology EMRs in LMICs, requirements overlap those from high-income countries, but generic EMR functionalities, Infrastructural and organizational requirements are still considered priority in LMICs compared to oncology-specific requirements or advanced EMR features e.g. computerized decision support or interoperability. Concept mapping is a fast and cost-effective method for eliciting and prioritizing EMR requirements in a user-centered manner.

摘要

背景

了解功能和非功能需求对于成功实施电子病历(EMR)系统至关重要。实际需求因上下文而异。

目的

在中低收入国家(LMICs)中引出并确定实施 EMR 的需求,并将这些需求与高收入国家的需求联系起来。

参与者和设置

涉及来自不同 LMIC 的癌症护理利益相关者,包括肿瘤学家、全科医生、护士、生物统计学家、信息技术人员。

方法

使用概念映射。通过焦点小组讨论(FGD)和访谈获得需求陈述。使用调查对需求进行聚类和重要性和可行性排名。使用 SPSS 中的聚类层次分析和多维尺度分析对数据进行分析,创建反映需求之间关系及其优先级的聚类图和可行区图。

结果

进行了四次 FGD 会议,有二十名参与者参加。此外,还采访了六名参与者。二十二人对需求进行聚类,六十三人对重要性和可行性进行排名。共生成了 160 个需求陈述,经过去重和合并后减少到 64 个。获得了九个聚类,按照重要性顺序包含以下领域:安全性、有利的组织、管理/治理、一般 EMR 功能、计算机基础设施、数据管理、可用性、肿瘤学决策支持和辅助要求。在排名方面,需求在重要性方面的得分在 3.74 到 4.80 之间,在可行性方面的得分在 3.55 到 4.46 之间,使用 5 分制李克特量表。我们生成了概念图,以便在与利益相关者沟通时使用。

结论

对于 LMIC 中的肿瘤学 EMR,需求与高收入国家的需求重叠,但与肿瘤学特定需求或高级 EMR 功能(例如计算机化决策支持或互操作性)相比,通用 EMR 功能、基础设施和组织需求仍被视为 LMIC 的优先事项。概念映射是一种快速且具有成本效益的方法,可以以用户为中心引出和确定 EMR 需求的优先级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验