• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电子病历系统的特定任务可用性要求:来自终端用户全国性调查的经验教训。

Task-specific usability requirements of electronic medical records systems: Lessons learned from a national survey of end-users.

作者信息

Farzandipour Mehrdad, Meidani Zahra, Riazi Hossein, Sadeqi Jabali Monireh

机构信息

a Health Information Management Research Center, Department of Health Information Management & Technology, School of Allied Health Professions , Kashan University of Medical Sciences , Kashan , Iran.

b Diabetes Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute , Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Tehran , Iran.

出版信息

Inform Health Soc Care. 2018 Sep;43(3):280-299. doi: 10.1080/17538157.2017.1290639. Epub 2017 Apr 11.

DOI:10.1080/17538157.2017.1290639
PMID:28398097
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are various approaches to evaluating the usability of electronic medical record (EMR) systems. User perspectives are an integral part of evaluation. Usability evaluations efficiently and effectively contribute to user-centered design and supports tasks and increase user satisfaction. This study determined the main usability requirements for EMRs by means of an end-user survey.

METHOD

A mixed-method strategy was conducted in three phases. A qualitative approach was employed to collect and formulate EMR usability requirements using the focus group method and the modified Delphi technique. Classic Delphi technique was used to evaluate the proposed requirements among 380 end-users in Iran.

RESULTS

The final list of EMR usability requirements was verified and included 163 requirements divided into nine groups. The highest rates of end-user agreement relate to EMR visual clarity (3.65 ± 0.61), fault tolerance (3.58 ± 0.56), and suitability for learning (3.55 ± 0.54). The lowest end-user agreement was for auditory presentation (3.18 ± 0.69).

CONCLUSION

The highest and lowest agreement among end-users was for visual clarity and auditory presentation by EMRs, respectively. This suggests that user priorities in determination of EMR usability and their understanding of the importance of the types of individual tasks and context characteristics differ.

摘要

背景

评估电子病历(EMR)系统可用性有多种方法。用户视角是评估的一个组成部分。可用性评估能高效且有效地促进以用户为中心的设计,支持各项任务并提高用户满意度。本研究通过终端用户调查确定了电子病历的主要可用性要求。

方法

采用混合方法策略,分三个阶段进行。运用焦点小组法和改进的德尔菲技术,采用定性方法收集和制定电子病历可用性要求。使用经典德尔菲技术在伊朗的380名终端用户中评估所提出的要求。

结果

电子病历可用性要求的最终清单得到验证,包括163项要求,分为九组。终端用户同意率最高的是电子病历的视觉清晰度(3.65±0.61)、容错性(3.58±0.56)和易学性(3.55±0.54)。终端用户同意率最低的是听觉呈现(3.18±0.69)。

结论

终端用户同意率最高和最低的分别是电子病历的视觉清晰度和听觉呈现。这表明在确定电子病历可用性时用户的优先事项以及他们对各项任务类型和情境特征重要性的理解存在差异。

相似文献

1
Task-specific usability requirements of electronic medical records systems: Lessons learned from a national survey of end-users.电子病历系统的特定任务可用性要求:来自终端用户全国性调查的经验教训。
Inform Health Soc Care. 2018 Sep;43(3):280-299. doi: 10.1080/17538157.2017.1290639. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
2
Usability and Safety in Electronic Medical Records Interface Design: A Review of Recent Literature and Guideline Formulation.电子病历界面设计中的可用性与安全性:近期文献综述与指南制定
Hum Factors. 2015 Aug;57(5):805-34. doi: 10.1177/0018720815576827. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
3
Pre-post evaluation of physicians' satisfaction with a redesigned electronic medical record system.对医生对重新设计的电子病历系统满意度的前后评估。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;136:303-8.
4
A study of user requests regarding the fully electronic health record system at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital: challenges for future electronic health record systems.一项关于首尔国立大学盆唐医院全电子健康记录系统用户请求的研究:对未来电子健康记录系统的挑战。
Int J Med Inform. 2013 May;82(5):387-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.08.004. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
5
Proposing Electronic Health Record Usability Requirements Based on Enriched ISO 9241 Metric Usability Model.基于丰富的ISO 9241度量可用性模型提出电子健康记录可用性要求。
Acta Inform Med. 2018;26(1):29-34. doi: 10.5455/aim.2018.26.29-34.
6
Elicitation and prioritization of requirements for electronic health records for oncology in low resource settings: A concept mapping study.在资源匮乏环境下进行肿瘤电子病历需求的发掘和优先级排序:概念映射研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Mar;135:104055. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.104055. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
7
Design of electronic medical record user interfaces: a matrix-based method for improving usability.电子病历用户界面设计:一种基于矩阵的提高可用性方法。
J Healthc Eng. 2013;4(3):427-52. doi: 10.1260/2040-2295.4.3.427.
8
A case study on better iconographic design in electronic medical records' user interface.电子病历用户界面中更佳图像设计的案例研究。
Inform Health Soc Care. 2008 Jun;33(2):125-38. doi: 10.1080/17538150802127298.
9
Investigation of usability problems of electronic medical record systems in the emergency department.急诊科电子病历系统可用性问题的调查。
Work. 2022;72(1):221-238. doi: 10.3233/WOR-205262.
10
Evaluating physician satisfaction regarding user interactions with an electronic medical record system.评估医生对用户与电子病历系统交互情况的满意度。
Proc AMIA Symp. 1999:400-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Perioperative Risk Prediction in Major Gynaecological Oncology Surgery: A National Diagnostic Survey of UK Clinical Practice.妇科肿瘤大手术围手术期风险预测:英国临床实践的全国性诊断调查
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jul 6;15(13):1723. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15131723.
2
Collecting Feedback From Neurologists and Patients to Guide Development of a Parkinson Disease App (DigiPark): Qualitative, Noninterventional Study.收集神经科医生和患者的反馈以指导帕金森病应用程序(DigiPark)的开发:定性、非干预性研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Dec 31;11:e55032. doi: 10.2196/55032.
3
Comparison of usability evaluation methods for a health information system: heuristic evaluation versus cognitive walkthrough method.
健康信息系统可用性评估方法比较:启发式评估与认知走查法。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Jun 18;22(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01905-7.
4
A Study on the Relationship between Usability of GUIs and Power Consumption of a PC: The Case of PHRs.图形用户界面(GUI)易用性与个人计算机功耗关系的研究:以健康记录系统(PHR)为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 3;18(4):1385. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041385.
5
Technical requirements framework of hospital information systems: design and evaluation.医院信息系统的技术要求框架:设计与评估。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Apr 3;20(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-1076-5.
6
Usability Evaluation of Three Admission and Medical Records Subsystems Integrated into Nationwide Hospital Information Systems: Heuristic Evaluation.集成到全国医院信息系统中的三个入院和病历子系统的可用性评估:启发式评估
Acta Inform Med. 2018 Jun;26(2):133-138. doi: 10.5455/aim.2018.26.133-138.