Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago.
Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, and Center for Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomic Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Jan;26(1):67-75. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.1.67.
Adherence and persistence with diabetes medication play an important role in glycemic control and may differ by medication class. However, there is a lack of research comparing diabetes medications in patients with renal impairment, despite the challenges and higher burden associated with managing this population.
To compare adherence and persistence among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and nondialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD) treated with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors versus pioglitazone.
This retrospective cohort study used Truven MarketScan administrative claims databases from 2009 to 2015. One-year adherence for patients with T2DM and nondialysis CKD who initiated therapy with either a DPP-4 inhibitor or pioglitazone was measured by proportion of days covered (PDC) following an initial dispensing, and PDC ≥ 0.80 was coded as adherent. Persistence was calculated as the days between the index date and last day with the index medication on hand, based on the end of the last days supply or the end of follow-up (i.e., 365 days), whichever occurred first. Multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate confounder-adjusted differences between the groups for adherence and persistence.
The final cohort included 9,019 patients (DPP-4 inhibitors: 7,002; pioglitazone: 2,017). In the adjusted analysis, DPP-4 inhibitor users demonstrated a 1.41 (95% CI = 1.25-1.59) higher odds of being adherent compared with pioglitazone users. Overall adjusted HR for persistence was 0.74 (95% CI = 0.69-0.79), which favored DPP-4 inhibitors compared with pioglitazone. Relative to 2010, persistence with pioglitazone decreased in 2011-2012 and then increased in 2013-2014. In the subgroup analysis, DPP-4 inhibitors first had lower (2010: OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.70-0.87; 2011-2012: OR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.54-0.66) and then similar (2013-2014: OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.88-1.19) hazards of nonpersistence compared with pioglitazone.
Among patients with T2DM and nondialysis CKD, the use of DPP-4 inhibitors was associated with better adherence compared with pioglitazone. However, following the approval of generic pioglitazone and associated lower cost sharing after 2012, the magnitude of difference in adherence between the medication classes reduced. Similarly, safety warnings in 2011 and approval of generic products in 2012 may have affected pioglitazone persistence, leading to first higher and then similar hazards for nonpersistence with pioglitazone as compared with DPP-4 inhibitors. These shifts in the results for pioglitazone warrant further investigation and close monitoring of the population initiating this medication.
No funding was received for this study. The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. An abstract for this study was presented as a podium presentation at the International Society of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) 2019 Annual Meeting; May 18-22, 2019; New Orleans, LA.
糖尿病药物的依从性和持久性在血糖控制中起着重要作用,并且可能因药物类别而异。然而,尽管管理这类人群存在挑战和更高的负担,但缺乏对肾功能损害患者的糖尿病药物比较研究。
比较二肽基肽酶-4(DPP-4)抑制剂与吡格列酮治疗 2 型糖尿病伴非透析慢性肾病(CKD)患者的依从性和持久性。
这项回顾性队列研究使用了 2009 年至 2015 年 Truven MarketScan 行政索赔数据库。通过初始配药后 PDC(用药天数比例)衡量起始治疗使用 DPP-4 抑制剂或吡格列酮的 T2DM 伴非透析 CKD 患者的 1 年依从性,PDC≥0.80 被编码为依从。根据最后一天的供应或随访结束(即 365 天),首先发生的情况,计算持久性作为索引日期和最后一次使用索引药物之间的天数。使用多变量逻辑回归和 Cox 比例风险模型来估计两组在依从性和持久性方面的混杂调整差异。
最终队列纳入了 9019 例患者(DPP-4 抑制剂:7002 例;吡格列酮:2017 例)。在调整分析中,与吡格列酮相比,DPP-4 抑制剂使用者的依从性高出 1.41 倍(95%CI=1.25-1.59)。总体调整后的 HR 为 0.74(95%CI=0.69-0.79),这有利于 DPP-4 抑制剂与吡格列酮相比。与 2010 年相比,吡格列酮的持久性在 2011-2012 年下降,然后在 2013-2014 年增加。在亚组分析中,与吡格列酮相比,DPP-4 抑制剂的非持久性风险最初较低(2010 年:OR=0.78,95%CI=0.70-0.87;2011-2012 年:OR=0.60,95%CI=0.54-0.66),然后相似(2013-2014 年:OR=1.03,95%CI=0.88-1.19)。
在 2 型糖尿病伴非透析 CKD 患者中,与吡格列酮相比,使用 DPP-4 抑制剂与更好的依从性相关。然而,在 2012 年批准通用吡格列酮和相关的较低共付额后,药物类别的依从性差异幅度缩小。同样,2011 年的安全性警告和 2012 年的通用产品批准可能会影响吡格列酮的持久性,导致与 DPP-4 抑制剂相比,吡格列酮的非持久性风险最初较高,然后相似。吡格列酮结果的这些变化需要进一步研究,并密切监测开始使用这种药物的人群。
本研究未获得资金支持。作者没有利益冲突需要披露。本研究的摘要以壁报形式在 2019 年国际药物经济学与结果研究学会(ISPOR)年会上进行了陈述;2019 年 5 月 18 日至 22 日;新奥尔良,LA。