Suppr超能文献

慢性口腔颌面部疼痛对健康相关生活质量的影响。

The impact of chronic orofacial pain on health-related quality of life.

机构信息

Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, Lemminkäisenkatu 2, FIN-21520 Turku, Finland, Phone: +358 405392030.

Research Unit of Oral Health Sciences, University of Oulu, Box 5000, FIN-90014, University of Oulu, Finland.

出版信息

Scand J Pain. 2020 Apr 28;20(2):329-338. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2019-0131.

Abstract

Background and aims Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) assessments have been widely used in pain medicine as they are able to reflect the subjective and multidimensional nature of chronic pain. Studies have shown a consistent impairment in HRQoL in different chronic pain conditions. However, it is not known whether HRQoL is impaired in chronic orofacial pain (OFP). The generic 15D HRQoL instrument has been shown to fare as well as or better than other generic HRQoL instruments in the study of chronic pain. The aim was to investigate HRQoL in patients with chronic OFP using the generic 15D HRQoL instrument. The validity of the instrument was tested by studying the association of the 15D data with pain interference. Methods One hundred fifty-one patients (mean age 50 years, SD 15 years, 119 females) were recruited from three tertiary facial pain clinics. HRQoL data of the participants were contrasted with that of an age- and gender- standardized sample of general population by comparing the mean 15D scores and profiles. The data for the general population came from the National Health 2011 Survey representing Finnish population aged 18 years and older. Pain interference was assessed using Brief Pain Inventory. Based on pain interference distribution the participants were divided into tertiles. Statistical comparison between patient and population HRQoL values were performed using Monte-Carlo-type simulations. Statistical significance for the hypothesis of linearity was evaluated by using generalized linear models. Results The mean 15D score of OFP patients (0.824, SD 0.113) was statistically significantly lower than that of the age- and gender-standardized general population (0.929, SD 0.019) (p < 0.001). The difference between the patients and the general population was also clinically important, i.e. over the minimum clinically important difference in the 15D score. All mean 15D dimension values were significantly lower compared with the general population values (p < 0.001 for all dimensions). The largest differences were seen in the dimensions of discomfort and symptoms (0.418, SD 0.222 vs. 0.816, SD 0.027), sleeping (0.693, SD 0.258 vs. 0.838, SD 0.029), and vitality (0.702, SD 0.221 vs. 0.884 SD 0.026). There was a statistically significant linear decrease in the 15D dimension values (p < 0.001) with increasing pain interference. The greatest differences were found on the dimensions of discomfort and symptoms, sleeping and vitality. Conclusions HRQoL is significantly impaired in patients with chronic OFP. A decrease in the 15D dimension values with increasing pain interference indicated convergent validity between 15D and pain interference. Implications The findings suggest that 15D is an appropriate instrument for use in the assessment of HRQoL in OFP patients. By showing the usefulness of the 15D, the present study may encourage further use of generic HRQoL assessments in the study of chronic OFP, and contribute e.g. to the implementation of HRQoL as one of the core outcome measures in future treatment studies on chronic OFP.

摘要

背景与目的 健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)评估已广泛应用于疼痛医学,因为它们能够反映慢性疼痛的主观和多维性质。研究表明,不同慢性疼痛状况下的 HRQoL 均存在明显受损。然而,慢性口腔颌面部疼痛(OFP)患者的 HRQoL 是否受损尚不清楚。通用 15D HRQoL 量表在慢性疼痛研究中的表现与其他通用 HRQoL 量表一样好或更好。本研究旨在使用通用 15D HRQoL 量表评估慢性 OFP 患者的 HRQoL。通过研究 15D 数据与疼痛干扰的相关性来检验仪器的有效性。

方法 从三个三级面部疼痛诊所招募了 151 名患者(平均年龄 50 岁,标准差 15 岁,119 名女性)。通过比较平均 15D 评分和分布情况,将参与者的 HRQoL 数据与年龄和性别标准化的一般人群数据进行对比。一般人群的数据来自代表芬兰 18 岁及以上人群的 2011 年国家健康调查。使用简短疼痛量表评估疼痛干扰。根据疼痛干扰分布,将参与者分为三分位。使用蒙特卡罗型模拟比较患者和人群 HRQoL 值。使用广义线性模型评估线性假设的统计学显著性。

结果 OFP 患者的平均 15D 评分(0.824,标准差 0.113)明显低于年龄和性别标准化的一般人群(0.929,标准差 0.019)(p<0.001)。患者与一般人群之间的差异也具有临床意义,即 15D 评分的最小临床重要差异。与一般人群相比,所有平均 15D 维度值均明显较低(所有维度 p<0.001)。差异最大的是不适感和症状维度(0.418,标准差 0.222 与 0.816,标准差 0.027)、睡眠维度(0.693,标准差 0.258 与 0.838,标准差 0.029)和活力维度(0.702,标准差 0.221 与 0.884,标准差 0.026)。随着疼痛干扰的增加,15D 维度值呈统计学显著线性下降(p<0.001)。差异最大的维度是不适感和症状、睡眠和活力。

结论 慢性 OFP 患者的 HRQoL 明显受损。随着疼痛干扰的增加,15D 维度值的下降表明 15D 与疼痛干扰之间存在收敛效度。

意义 这些发现表明,15D 是评估 OFP 患者 HRQoL 的合适工具。通过显示 15D 的有效性,本研究可能会鼓励在慢性 OFP 的研究中进一步使用通用 HRQoL 评估,并有助于将 HRQoL 作为未来慢性 OFP 治疗研究的核心结果指标之一实施。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验