• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当我们要求对住院的困惑老年人进行“专科化”时,我们在要求什么?概念分析。

What are we asking for when requesting "Specialling" for the confused hospitalised older person? A concept analysis.

机构信息

Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Bulli Hospital, Warrawong, NSW, Australia.

Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, DN&M District Nursing & Midwifery, Warrawong, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Older People Nurs. 2020 Jun;15(2):e12302. doi: 10.1111/opn.12302. Epub 2019 Dec 30.

DOI:10.1111/opn.12302
PMID:31885196
Abstract

UNLABELLED

BACKGROUND AND/OR RATIONALE: "Specialling" is a common nursing practice in hospitals which entails the allocation of extra staff to be with an older person who is confused to maintain safety. Despite ongoing use, this practice has little evidence of effectiveness. To facilitate further investigation, a concept analysis of "specialling" was undertaken.

AIMS

The aim of this paper was to report on a concept analysis on the practice of "specialling" pertaining to older people who have cognitive impairment when in hospital.

METHODS

This study used Rodgers evolutionary approach to concept analysis to clarify the attributes, antecedents and consequences of the concept to determine a definition of "specialling." Web of Science (Core Collection and Web of Science Medline), CINAHL and SCOPUS databases were searched to identify relevant literature. Due to the scarcity of papers, the search was broadened to include all sources that could add understanding.

FINDINGS

A total of (n = 43) sources were identified. The attributes were themed to 5 categories: Labels and descriptions; the "Special" role; Patient safety; Patient care; and Communication. The antecedents to 2 themes: Patient characteristics; and Organisational risk. The consequences of "specialling" were diverse with 6 themes: the "Special" role; the Older persons experience; Costly; "Special" use and nursing beliefs; Safety outcomes; and Opportunities.

DISCUSSION

The process of concept analysis provided a means to identify knowledge gaps and practice challenges. The definition determined from this analysis has provided a reflective opportunity for clinicians and researchers to consider when implementing care initiatives to support older people in hospital. Important is the lack of person-centred approaches and the opportunities in developing nurse leadership through empowerment. The findings from this analysis will inform a PhD study.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Nurses have an opportunity to lead care improvements by ensuring person-centred approaches in the care of older people with cognitive impairment.

摘要

目的

本文旨在报告一项关于“specialling”实践的概念分析,该实践涉及在医院中患有认知障碍的老年人,以保持安全。

方法

本研究采用罗杰斯的进化方法进行概念分析,以澄清该概念的属性、前因和后果,从而确定“specialling”的定义。Web of Science(核心合集和 Web of Science Medline)、CINAHL 和 SCOPUS 数据库被用于搜索相关文献。由于文献稀少,因此扩大了搜索范围,包括所有可以增加理解的来源。

发现

共确定了(n=43)个来源。属性被主题化为 5 个类别:标签和描述;“特殊”角色;患者安全;患者护理;以及沟通。两个主题的前因:患者特征;以及组织风险。“specialling”的后果是多样化的,有 6 个主题:“特殊”角色;老年人的体验;昂贵;“特殊”使用和护理信念;安全结果;以及机会。

讨论

概念分析的过程为识别知识差距和实践挑战提供了一种手段。从这一分析中确定的定义为临床医生和研究人员提供了一个反思的机会,让他们在实施支持医院中老年人的护理计划时考虑这一问题。重要的是缺乏以人为本的方法,以及通过赋权发展护士领导能力的机会。这一分析的结果将为一项博士研究提供信息。

意义

护士有机会通过确保以患者为中心的方法来改善对认知障碍老年人的护理,从而领导护理改进。

相似文献

1
What are we asking for when requesting "Specialling" for the confused hospitalised older person? A concept analysis.当我们要求对住院的困惑老年人进行“专科化”时,我们在要求什么?概念分析。
Int J Older People Nurs. 2020 Jun;15(2):e12302. doi: 10.1111/opn.12302. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
2
An observational study of older patient specialling in acute hospital settings.老年患者在急性医院环境中的专科观察研究。
Int J Older People Nurs. 2020 Dec;15(4):e12323. doi: 10.1111/opn.12323. Epub 2020 May 18.
3
One to one specialling and sitters in acute care hospitals: A scoping review.在急症医院中一对一专科化和陪护:范围综述。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Aug;84:61-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.04.018. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
4
Reconciling conceptualizations of relationships and person-centred care for older people with cognitive impairment in acute care settings.在急症护理环境中,协调针对认知障碍老年人的人际关系概念化与人本位护理。
Nurs Philos. 2018 Apr;19(2). doi: 10.1111/nup.12169. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
5
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
6
The person-centred care of older people with cognitive impairment in acute care (POPAC) scale - psychometric evaluation.急性护理中认知障碍老年人的以患者为中心护理(POPAC)量表——心理测量学评估
J Nurs Manag. 2017 Mar;25(2):139-147. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12451. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
7
Expanded nursing roles to promote person-centred care for people with cognitive impairment in acute care (ENROLE-acute): study protocol for a controlled clinical trial, process and economic evaluation.扩大护理角色以促进急性护理认知障碍患者的以患者为中心的护理(ENROLE-acute):一项对照临床试验、过程和经济评价的研究方案。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Dec 14;23(1):858. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04560-3.
8
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
9
The "Golden Angels": effects of trained volunteers on specialling and readmission rates for people with dementia and delirium in rural hospitals.“金天使”:培训志愿者对农村医院痴呆和谵妄患者专科化和再入院率的影响。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2018 Nov;30(11):1707-1716. doi: 10.1017/S1041610218000911. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
10
Developing a dementia care leaders' toolkit for older patients with cognitive impairment.为认知障碍的老年患者开发痴呆症护理领导者工具包。
Nurs Older People. 2021 Feb 2;33(1):14-19. doi: 10.7748/nop.2020.e1250. Epub 2020 Aug 27.