Suppr超能文献

基于证据的医师领导力发展:系统文献回顾。

Evidence-based leadership development for physicians: A systematic literature review.

机构信息

Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, 184 Hills Rd, Cambridge, CB2 8PQ, UK; Health Education England (HEE) and the National Health Service (NHS) North West, 3 Piccadilly Place, London Road, Manchester, M1 3BN, UK.

Cass Business School, City, University of London, 106 Bunhill Row, London, EC1Y 8TZ, UK; IZA Labor Research Institute, Germany.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2020 Feb;246:112709. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112709. Epub 2019 Nov 30.

Abstract

Interest in leadership development in healthcare is substantial. Yet it remains unclear which interventions are most reliably associated with positive outcomes. We focus on the important area of physician leadership development in a systematic literature review of the latest research from 2007 to 2016. The paper applies a validated instrument used for medical education, MERSQI, to the included studies. Ours is the first review in this research area to create a tiered rating system to assess the best available evidence. We concentrate on findings from papers in the highly-rated categories. First, our review concludes that improvements in individual-level outcomes can be achieved (e.g. knowledge, motivation, skills, and behaviour change). Second, development programs can substantially improve organizational and benefit to patients outcomes. Third, some of the most effective interventions include: interactive workshops, videotaped simulations followed by peer and expert feedback, Multisource Feedback (MSF), coaching, action learning, and mentoring. Fourth, the evidence suggests that objective outcome data should be collected at baseline, end of program, and retrospectively. An outcomes-based approach appears to be the most effective design of programs. We also make recommendations for future research and practice.

摘要

人们对医疗保健领域领导力发展的兴趣浓厚。然而,目前仍不清楚哪些干预措施最能可靠地带来积极的结果。我们在对 2007 年至 2016 年最新研究的系统文献综述中,重点关注医生领导力发展这一重要领域。本文采用了一种经过验证的、用于医学教育的工具 MERSQI,对纳入的研究进行评估。我们的研究是该研究领域中第一个创建分层评级系统来评估最佳现有证据的综述。我们专注于来自高评级类别的论文中的发现。首先,我们的综述得出结论,个体层面的结果可以得到改善(例如知识、动机、技能和行为改变)。其次,发展计划可以显著改善组织和患者的受益。第三,一些最有效的干预措施包括:互动研讨会、录像模拟后进行同行和专家反馈、多源反馈(MSF)、辅导、行动学习和指导。第四,证据表明,应该在基线、项目结束时和回顾时收集基于结果的数据。基于结果的方法似乎是最有效的项目设计。我们还为未来的研究和实践提出了建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验