Biological and Artificial Self-organised Systems Team, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Evolutionary Biology & Ecology Unit, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 30;9(1):20331. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56504-w.
In collective decision-making, when confronted with different options, groups usually show a more marked preference for one of the options than do isolated individuals. This results from the amplification of individual preferences by social interactions within the group. We show, in an unusual counter-example, that when facing a binary choice between shelters with different relative humidities, isolated cockroaches of the species Periplaneta americana select the wettest shelter, while groups select the driest one. This inversion of selection results from a conflictual influence of humidity on the probabilities of entering and leaving each shelter. It is shown that the individual probability of entering the wettest shelter is higher than the group probability and is increased by previous entries and exits. The probability of leaving each shelter decreases in the population due to social interactions, but this decrease is less pronounced in the wettest shelter, suggesting weaker social interactions. A theoretical model is developed and highlights the existence of tipping points dependent on population size, beyond which an inversion of selection of a resting place is observed.
在集体决策中,当面临不同的选择时,群体通常比孤立的个体更倾向于其中一个选择。这是由于群体内部的社会相互作用放大了个体偏好。我们在一个不寻常的反例中表明,当面对相对湿度不同的两种栖息地之间的二元选择时,美洲大蠊个体选择最潮湿的栖息地,而群体则选择最干燥的栖息地。这种选择的反转是由于湿度对进入和离开每个栖息地的概率产生了冲突性的影响。结果表明,个体进入最潮湿栖息地的概率高于群体概率,并且会因先前的进入和退出而增加。由于社会相互作用,每个栖息地的离开概率会在种群中降低,但在最潮湿的栖息地中这种降低不太明显,表明社会相互作用较弱。我们提出了一个理论模型,该模型强调了存在依赖于种群大小的临界点,超过这个临界点就会观察到栖息地选择的反转。