• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发一个带有工具的框架,以支持患者报告结局测量指标的选择与实施。

Development of a framework with tools to support the selection and implementation of patient-reported outcome measures.

作者信息

van der Wees Philip J, Verkerk Eva W, Verbiest Marjolein E A, Zuidgeest Marloes, Bakker Carla, Braspenning Jozé, de Boer Dolf, Terwee Caroline B, Vajda Ildikó, Beurskens Anna, van Dulmen Simone A

机构信息

Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ Healthcare, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Tilburg University, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2019 Dec 30;3(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s41687-019-0171-9.

DOI:10.1186/s41687-019-0171-9
PMID:31889232
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6937349/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient reported outcomes (PROs) provide information on a patient's health status coming directly from the patient. Measuring PROs with patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) has gained wide interest in clinical practice for individual patient care, as well as in quality improvement, and for providing transparency of outcomes to stakeholders through public reporting. However, current knowledge of selecting and implementing PROMs for these purposes is scattered, and not readily available for clinicians and quality managers in healthcare organizations. The objective of this study is to develop a framework with tools to support the systematic selection, implementation and evaluation of PROs and PROMs in individual patient care, for quality improvement and public reporting.

METHODS

We developed the framework in a national project in the Netherlands following a user-centered design. The development process of the framework contained five iterative components: (a) identification of existing tools, (b) identification of user requirements and designing steps for selection and implementation of PROs and PROMs, (c) discussing a prototype of the framework during a national workshop, (d) developing a web version, (e) pre-testing of the framework. A total of 40 users with different perspectives (clinicians, patient representatives, quality managers, purchasers, researchers) have been consulted.

RESULTS

The final framework is presented as the PROM-cycle that consists of eight steps in four phases: (1) goal setting, (2) selecting PROs and PROMs, (3) developing and testing of quality indicator(s), (4) implementing and evaluating the PROM(s) and indicator(s). Users emphasized that the first step is the key element in which the why, for whom and setting of the PROM has to be defined. This information is decisive for the following steps. For each step the PROM-cycle provides guidance and tools, with instruments, checklists, methods, handbooks, and standards supporting the process.

CONCLUSION

We developed a framework to support the selection and implementation of PROs and PROMs. Each step provides guidance and tools to support the process. The PROM-cycle and its tools are publicly available and can be used by clinicians, quality managers, patient representatives and other experts involved in using PROMS. Through periodic evaluation and updates, tools will be added for national and international use of the PROM-cycle.

摘要

背景

患者报告结局(PROs)提供了直接来自患者的关于其健康状况的信息。使用患者报告结局测量工具(PROMs)来测量PROs在临床实践中已引起广泛关注,可用于个体患者护理、质量改进以及通过公开报告向利益相关者提供结局透明度。然而,目前关于为这些目的选择和实施PROMs的知识较为零散,医疗保健机构的临床医生和质量管理人员难以获取。本研究的目的是开发一个包含工具的框架,以支持在个体患者护理中对PROs和PROMs进行系统选择、实施和评估,用于质量改进和公开报告。

方法

我们在荷兰的一个国家项目中遵循以用户为中心的设计方法开发了该框架。框架的开发过程包含五个迭代组件:(a)识别现有工具;(b)识别用户需求并设计PROs和PROMs选择与实施步骤;(c)在全国研讨会上讨论框架原型;(d)开发网络版;(e)对框架进行预测试。共咨询了40位具有不同视角的用户(临床医生、患者代表、质量管理人员、采购人员、研究人员)。

结果

最终框架以PROM循环的形式呈现,包括四个阶段的八个步骤:(1)目标设定;(2)选择PROs和PROMs;(3)制定和测试质量指标;(4)实施和评估PROMs及指标。用户强调第一步是关键要素,必须明确PROM的目的、适用对象和背景。这些信息对后续步骤起决定性作用。对于每个步骤,PROM循环都提供指导和工具,包括支持该过程的仪器、清单、方法、手册和标准。

结论

我们开发了一个支持PROs和PROMs选择与实施的框架。每个步骤都提供指导和工具以支持该过程。PROM循环及其工具已公开可用,临床医生、质量管理人员、患者代表以及参与使用PROMs的其他专家均可使用。通过定期评估和更新,将添加适用于PROM循环在国内和国际使用的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ceb/6937349/5b9f0ad78107/41687_2019_171_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ceb/6937349/5b9f0ad78107/41687_2019_171_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ceb/6937349/5b9f0ad78107/41687_2019_171_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of a framework with tools to support the selection and implementation of patient-reported outcome measures.开发一个带有工具的框架,以支持患者报告结局测量指标的选择与实施。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2019 Dec 30;3(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s41687-019-0171-9.
2
Development of a standard set of PROs and generic PROMs for Dutch medical specialist care : Recommendations from the Outcome-Based Healthcare Program Working Group Generic PROMs.开发一套荷兰医疗专家护理的标准 PRO 和通用 PROM 集:基于结果的医疗保健计划工作组通用 PROM 的建议。
Qual Life Res. 2023 Jun;32(6):1595-1605. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03328-3. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
3
Healthcare provider characteristics that influence the implementation of individual-level patient-centered outcome measure (PROM) and patient-reported experience measure (PREM) data across practice settings: a protocol for a mixed methods systematic review with a narrative synthesis.影响个体层面患者为中心的结局测量(PROM)和患者报告的体验测量(PREM)数据在各实践环境中实施的医疗服务提供者特征:一项混合方法系统评价的方案,采用叙述性综合方法。
Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 9;10(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01725-2.
4
Framework To Guide The Collection And Use Of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures In The Learning Healthcare System.学习型医疗保健系统中指导患者报告结局测量数据收集与使用的框架
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2017 Sep 4;5(1):17. doi: 10.5334/egems.227.
5
Selection of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for use in health systems.用于卫生系统的患者报告结局指标(PROMs)的选择
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2021 Oct 12;5(Suppl 2):99. doi: 10.1186/s41687-021-00374-2.
6
7
A systematic review of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and quality of life reporting in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.一项关于接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者的患者报告结局指标(PROMs)及生活质量报告的系统评价。
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2019 Jun;8(3):228-245. doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2019.03.16.
8
Integrating the use of patient-reported outcomes for both clinical practice and performance measurement: views of experts from 3 countries.整合患者报告结局在临床实践和绩效评估中的应用:来自三个国家的专家观点
Milbank Q. 2014 Dec;92(4):754-75. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12091.
9
Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Gender-Affirming Care Worldwide: A Systematic Review.全球范围内用于性别肯定护理的患者报告结局测量的实施情况:系统评价。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Apr 3;6(4):e236425. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.6425.
10
Patient-reported outcomes for people with diabetes: what and how to measure? A narrative review.糖尿病患者的患者报告结局:应该测量什么以及如何测量?一篇叙述性综述。
Diabetologia. 2023 Aug;66(8):1357-1377. doi: 10.1007/s00125-023-05926-3. Epub 2023 May 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient Reported Outcome Measurements in Adult Spinal Deformity: A Narrative Review.成人脊柱畸形患者报告结局测量:一项叙述性综述。
Global Spine J. 2025 Jul;15(3_suppl):87S-94S. doi: 10.1177/21925682231188811. Epub 2025 Jul 9.
2
Voices that matter: The impact of patient-reported outcome measures on clinical decision-making.重要的声音:患者报告结局指标对临床决策的影响
World J Methodol. 2025 Jun 20;15(2):98066. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v15.i2.98066.
3
Evaluating the implementation of PROMs and PREMs in routine clinical care: co-design of tools from the perspective of patients and healthcare professionals.

本文引用的文献

1
Routine provision of feedback from patient-reported outcome measurements to healthcare providers and patients in clinical practice.在临床实践中,常规向医疗保健提供者和患者提供来自患者报告的结局测量的反馈。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 12;10(10):CD011589. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011589.pub2.
2
The facilitators and barriers to implementing patient reported outcome measures in organisations delivering health related services: a systematic review of reviews.在提供健康相关服务的组织中实施患者报告结局指标的促进因素和障碍:一项综述的系统评价
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2018 Oct 3;2:46. doi: 10.1186/s41687-018-0072-3. eCollection 2018 Dec.
3
评估患者报告结局测量(PROMs)和医护人员报告结局测量(PREMs)在常规临床护理中的实施情况:从患者和医护人员角度进行工具的联合设计。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2025 Feb 17;23(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12955-025-02333-7.
4
Living with Pyoderma Gangrenosum: A Qualitative Study.伴坏疽性脓皮病生存:一项定性研究。
Acta Derm Venereol. 2024 Dec 4;104:adv42018. doi: 10.2340/actadv.v104.42018.
5
The Indian Geriatrics Quality of Life Inventory Scale (IGQOLI): Development and Validation of a Scale to Evaluate the Quality of Life among Geriatric Population of India.印度老年生活质量量表(IGQOLI):一种评估印度老年人群生活质量的量表的开发与验证
J Lifestyle Med. 2024 Aug 31;14(2):80-87. doi: 10.15280/jlm.2024.14.2.80.
6
Evaluating Comprehensibility of 157 Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in the Nationwide Dutch Outcome-Based Healthcare Program: More Attention for Comprehensibility of PROMs is Needed.评估荷兰全国性基于结果的医疗保健计划中157项患者报告结局指标(PROMs)的可理解性:需要更多关注PROMs的可理解性
Patient. 2025 Jan;18(1):65-76. doi: 10.1007/s40271-024-00710-w. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
7
Engaging primary care professionals in OECD's international PaRIS survey: a documentary analysis.参与经合组织国际 PaRIS 调查的初级保健专业人员:文献分析。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Jul 4;22(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01170-2.
8
Construct validity of EQ-5D-5L among patients with inflammatory bowel disease-a study based on real-world data from the Swedish Inflammatory Bowel Disease Registry.炎症性肠病患者 EQ-5D-5L 的结构效度——基于瑞典炎症性肠病登记处真实世界数据的研究。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Mar 27;8(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00709-9.
9
Healthcare consumer acceptability of routine use of the EQ-5D-5L in clinical care: a cross-sectional survey.医疗保健消费者对在临床护理中常规使用EQ-5D-5L的可接受性:一项横断面调查。
Qual Life Res. 2024 May;33(5):1307-1321. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03598-z. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
10
Implementing patient-centred outcome measures in palliative care clinical practice for adults (IMPCOM): Protocol for an update systematic review of facilitators and barriers.在成人姑息治疗临床实践中实施以患者为中心的结局测量(IMPCOM):更新系统评价促进因素和障碍的方案。
F1000Res. 2023 Oct 30;12:224. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.131479.2. eCollection 2023.
COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures.
COSMIN 患者报告结局测量系统评价指南。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1147-1157. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
4
How do aggregated patient-reported outcome measures data stimulate health care improvement? A realist synthesis.聚合患者报告结局测量数据如何促进医疗保健改善?一个现实主义的综合。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2018 Jan;23(1):57-65. doi: 10.1177/1355819617740925. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
5
How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a "Core Outcome Set" - a practical guideline.如何为“核心结局集”中包含的结局选择结局测量工具——实用指南
Trials. 2016 Sep 13;17(1):449. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1555-2.
6
Reporting standards for guideline-based performance measures.基于指南的绩效指标报告标准。
Implement Sci. 2016 Jan 15;11:6. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0369-z.
7
Methods for Developing Patient-Reported Outcome-Based Performance Measures (PRO-PMs).基于患者报告结局的绩效指标(PRO-PMs)的开发方法。
Value Health. 2015 Jun;18(4):493-504. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.02.018. Epub 2015 May 21.
8
Integrating the use of patient-reported outcomes for both clinical practice and performance measurement: views of experts from 3 countries.整合患者报告结局在临床实践和绩效评估中的应用:来自三个国家的专家观点
Milbank Q. 2014 Dec;92(4):754-75. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12091.
9
Functionality and feedback: a protocol for a realist synthesis of the collation, interpretation and utilisation of PROMs data to improve patient care.功能与反馈:一项关于对患者报告结局测量(PROMs)数据进行整理、解读及利用以改善患者护理的实在论综合分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2014 Jul 22;4(7):e005601. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005601.
10
Measure once, cut twice--adding patient-reported outcome measures to the electronic health record for comparative effectiveness research.一次测量,两次裁剪——为比较疗效研究在电子健康记录中添加患者报告的结果测量。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;66(8 Suppl):S12-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.04.005.