Haller Charles, Vandehei Anthony, Fisher Raymond, Boster Joshua, Shipley Brian, Kaatz Christopher, Harris Jaclyn, Shin Satoshi R, Townsend Lisa, Rouse Jessica, Davis Sarah, Aden James, Thomas Dustin
Cardiology, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, USA.
Internal Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, USA.
Cureus. 2019 Nov 22;11(11):e6218. doi: 10.7759/cureus.6218.
Introduction Coronary artery calcification (CAC) scoring is typically performed utilizing non-contrast, electrocardiogram- (ECG) gated CT and offers an estimation of cardiovascular (CV) prognosis and risk stratification beyond previously established cardiac risk factors. Coronary calcification can also be assessed during non-gated chest CT, which is significant given the recent recommendations for lung cancer screening by low-dose CT. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 4,953 non-contrast chest CT scans in a single, closed referral tertiary military treatment facility over an 18-month period. Baseline CV outcomes to include myocardial infarction (MI), cerebral vascular accidents (CVA), revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), death, or a composite of all major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and baseline CV risk factors were abstracted from an electronic medical record (EMR) review. Results CAC was seen in 3,119 (63%) patients while 1,834 (27%) were without CAC. All traditional CV risk factors were more commonly observed in patients with CAC. Unadjusted odds of composite MACE, death, MI, coronary revascularization, and CVA between presence and absence of CAC were as follows: 3.55 [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.60-4.86, p: <0.0001]; 2.98 (95% CI: 2.02-4.40, p: <0.0001); 24.42 (95% CI: 3.36-177.6, p: <0.0001); 5.64 (95% CI: 2.58-12.32, p: <0.0001); and 2.32 (95% CI: 1.19-4.50, p: 0.0104), respectively. However, after adjusting for baseline risk factors, CAC on non-gated CT was associated only with an increased observed rate of MI (aOR: 38.1, 95% CI: 4.57-318.2, p: <0.0001) and revascularization (aOR: 5.58, 95% CI: 2.22-14.0, p; 0.0003). Conclusions Findings of CAC on non-gated chest CT may help to recognize patients who are at increased risk of MI and revascularization. Given the expected increase in chest CT utilization among former smokers for lung cancer screening, observed CAC should be reported to ordering providers in order to identify patients at increased risk of these important outcomes.
引言 冠状动脉钙化(CAC)评分通常使用非增强、心电图(ECG)门控CT进行,可提供超出先前确定的心脏危险因素之外的心血管(CV)预后评估和风险分层。在非门控胸部CT检查期间也可评估冠状动脉钙化,鉴于近期低剂量CT肺癌筛查的建议,这一点具有重要意义。方法 我们回顾性分析了一家封闭转诊的三级军事治疗机构在18个月期间的4953例非增强胸部CT扫描。从电子病历(EMR)回顾中提取基线CV结局,包括心肌梗死(MI)、脑血管意外(CVA)、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)或冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的血运重建、死亡或所有主要不良心脏事件(MACE)的综合情况,以及基线CV危险因素。结果 在3119例(63%)患者中发现了CAC,而1834例(27%)患者未发现CAC。所有传统CV危险因素在CAC患者中更常见。有无CAC之间MACE综合、死亡、MI、冠状动脉血运重建和CVA的未调整比值如下:3.55[95%置信区间(CI):2.60 - 4.86,p:<0.0001];2.98(95%CI:2.02 - 4.40,p:<0.0001);24.42(95%CI:3.36 - 177.6,p:<0.0001);5.64(95%CI:2.58 - 12.32,p:<0.0001);以及2.32(95%CI:1.19 - 4.50,p:0.0104)。然而,在调整基线危险因素后,非门控CT上的CAC仅与MI(调整后比值比[aOR]:38.1,95%CI:4.57 - 318.2,p:<0.0001)和血运重建(aOR:5.58,95%CI:2.22 - 14.0,p:0.0003)的观察发生率增加相关。结论 非门控胸部CT上CAC的发现可能有助于识别MI和血运重建风险增加的患者。鉴于肺癌筛查中前吸烟者胸部CT使用预计会增加,应将观察到的CAC报告给开单医生,以便识别这些重要结局风险增加的患者。