Ahmed Sadia, Djurkovic Andrea, Manalili Kimberly, Sahota Balreen, Santana Maria J
Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada.
Department of Student Accessibility Services, Student and Enrolment Services University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada.
Health Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 4;2(12):e140. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.140. eCollection 2019 Dec.
Patient-centered care (PCC) benefits patients, health-care providers, and health-care systems by providing delivery of care that addresses patient values and needs while improving provider experiences, and by decreasing health-care expenditure. To improve PCC, health-care systems need to measure it. Recently, we developed a PCC framework that is evidence based and patient informed. The purpose of this study was to gather the perspective of clinician-scientists and quality improvement experts regarding the PCC domains included in the framework. Their perspectives were used to refine these domains, which ultimately will inform the development of PCC quality indicators.
Participants were recruited via expert and snowball sampling. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with clinician-scientists and quality improvement experts from Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom from October 2017 to January 2018. With the use of an interview guide developed using the PCC framework, interviews were audio recorded and transcribed for a thematic analysis using NVivo qualitative data analysis software. Inductive thematic analysis was used to identify themes and subthemes.
Sixteen semi-structured interviews were conducted, which included four clinician-scientists and 12 quality improvement experts. Twelve of the participants were from Canada, three from the United Kingdom, and one from the United States. From the thematic analysis, three major themes were identified: (a) measurability of PCC, (b) practical considerations for implementing measurement, and (c) policy and practice implications. Participants discussed barriers and recommendations to improve and increase the clarity of the PCC domains in health system reporting, resulting in several future directions to refine and target specific PCC domains.
Clinician-scientists and quality improvement experts provided key recommendations for the measurement of PCC. The perspectives of key stakeholders in PCC measurement will inform strategies for the implementation and uptake of patient-centered quality indicators in health-care systems. The views of these key experts can lay the foundation for the development of standardized measures of PCC, to ensure monitoring and improvement of PCC.
以患者为中心的医疗服务(PCC)通过提供能满足患者价值观和需求的医疗服务,在改善医疗服务提供者体验的同时,降低医疗保健支出,从而使患者、医疗服务提供者和医疗保健系统均受益。为改善以患者为中心的医疗服务,医疗保健系统需要对其进行衡量。最近,我们开发了一个基于证据且以患者为依据的PCC框架。本研究的目的是收集临床科学家和质量改进专家对该框架中包含的PCC领域的看法。他们的观点被用于完善这些领域,这最终将为PCC质量指标的制定提供参考。
通过专家抽样和滚雪球抽样招募参与者。2017年10月至2018年1月,对来自加拿大、美国和英国的临床科学家和质量改进专家进行了半结构化访谈。使用基于PCC框架制定的访谈指南,对访谈进行录音并转录,以便使用NVivo定性数据分析软件进行主题分析。采用归纳主题分析来识别主题和子主题。
进行了16次半结构化访谈,其中包括4名临床科学家和12名质量改进专家。12名参与者来自加拿大,3名来自英国,1名来自美国。通过主题分析,确定了三个主要主题:(a)PCC的可衡量性,(b)实施衡量的实际考虑因素,以及(c)政策和实践意义。参与者讨论了在卫生系统报告中改善和提高PCC领域清晰度的障碍和建议,从而得出了几个完善和针对特定PCC领域的未来方向。
临床科学家和质量改进专家为PCC的衡量提供了关键建议。PCC衡量中关键利益相关者的观点将为医疗保健系统中以患者为中心的质量指标的实施和采用策略提供参考。这些关键专家的观点可为PCC标准化措施的制定奠定基础,以确保对PCC进行监测和改进。