Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management (CAPIM), School of Biosciences, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia.
Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management (CAPIM), School of Biosciences, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia; State Key Laboratory of Estuarine and Coastal Research, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200062, China.
Environ Pollut. 2020 Apr;259:113865. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113865. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
Compared to marine microplastics research, few studies have bio-monitored microplastics in inland waters. It is also important to understand the microplastics' uptake and their potential risks to freshwater species. The Australian glass shrimp Paratya australiensis (Family: Atyidae) is commonly found in fresh waterbodies in eastern Australia, and are sensitive to anthropogenic stressors but have a wide tolerance range to the natural environmental conditions. This study aimed to understand the microplastics' occurrence and types in water samples and the shrimp P. australiensis, and identify if the shrimp could be a suitable bioindicator for microplastic pollution. Surface water and P. australiensis across ten urban and rural freshwater sites in Victoria were sampled. In total, 30 water samples and 100 shrimp were analysed for microplastic content, and shrimp body weights and sizes were also recorded. Microplastics were picked, photographed and identified using FT-IR microscopy: in water samples, 57.9% of items including suspect items were selected to identify; all microplastics found in shrimp samples were identified. Microplastics were present in the surface waters of all sites, with an average abundance of 0.40 ± 0.27 items/L. A total of 36% of shrimp contained microplastics with an average of 0.52 ± 0.55 items/ind (24 ± 31 items/g). Fibre was the most common shape, and blue was the most frequent colour in both water and shrimp samples. The dominant plastic types were polyester in water samples, and rayon in shrimp samples. Even though results from this study show a relatively low concentration of microplastics in water samples in comparison with global studies, it is worth noticing that microplastics were regularly detected in fresh waterbodies in Victoria, Australia. Compared with water samples, shrimp contained a wider variety of plastic types, suggesting they may potentially behave as passive samplers of microplastics pollution in freshwater environments.
与海洋微塑料研究相比,内陆水域中微塑料的生物监测研究较少。了解微塑料的摄入及其对淡水物种的潜在风险也很重要。澳大利亚玻璃虾 Paratya australiensis(科:Atyidae)常见于澳大利亚东部的淡水水体中,对人为压力源敏感,但对自然环境条件有较宽的耐受范围。本研究旨在了解水样和虾 P. australiensis 中微塑料的发生和类型,并确定虾是否可作为微塑料污染的合适生物指标。在维多利亚州的十个城市和农村淡水地点采集了地表水和 P. australiensis。总共分析了 30 个水样和 100 只虾的微塑料含量,并记录了虾的体重和大小。使用 FT-IR 显微镜挑选、拍照和鉴定微塑料:在水样中,选择了 57.9%的项目进行鉴定,包括可疑物品;在虾样中发现的所有微塑料都得到了鉴定。所有地点的地表水均存在微塑料,平均丰度为 0.40±0.27 个/L。共有 36%的虾含有微塑料,平均每只虾含有 0.52±0.55 个/只(24±31 个/g)。纤维是最常见的形状,蓝色是水样和虾样中最常见的颜色。在水样中主要的塑料类型是聚酯,在虾样中主要的是人造丝。尽管本研究的结果显示与全球研究相比,水样中的微塑料浓度相对较低,但值得注意的是,澳大利亚维多利亚州的淡水体中经常检测到微塑料。与水样相比,虾中含有更多种类的塑料,这表明它们可能在淡水环境中作为微塑料污染的被动采样器。