• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在高容量中心,机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后手术切缘阳性的线性范围对生化复发有影响。

Linear extent of positive surgical margin impacts biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a high-volume center.

作者信息

Porcaro Antonio Benito, Tafuri Alessandro, Sebben Marco, Amigoni Nelia, Shakir Aliasger, Corsi Paolo, Processali Tania, Pirozzi Marco, Rizzetto Riccardo, Bernasconi Riccardo, Cerrato Clara, Tiso Leone, Migliorini Filippo, Novella Giovanni, Brunelli Matteo, De Marco Vincenzo, Siracusano Salvatore, Artibani Walter

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.

USC Institute of Urology and Catherine & Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Robot Surg. 2020 Aug;14(4):663-675. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-01039-5. Epub 2020 Jan 1.

DOI:10.1007/s11701-019-01039-5
PMID:31893344
Abstract

The objective of this study is to evaluate if surgeon volume and stratifying positive surgical margins (PSM) into focal and non-focal may differentially impact the risk of biochemical recurrence (BCR) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Between January 2013 and December 2017, 732 consecutive patients were evaluated. The population included negative cases (control group) and PSM subjects (study group). PSMs were stratified as focal (≤ 1 mm) or non-focal (> 1 mm). A logistic regression model assessed the independent association of factors with the risk of PSM. The risk of BCR of PSM and other factors was assessed by Cox's multivariate proportional hazards. Overall, 192 (26.3%) patients had PSM focal in 133 patients; non-focal in 59 cases. Focal PSM was associated with the percentage of biopsy positive cores (BPC; OR 1.011; p = 0.015), extra-capsular extension (pT3a stage; OR 2.064; p = 0.016), seminal vesicle invasion (pT3b; OR 2.150; p = 0.010), body mass index (odds ratio, OR 0.914; p = 0.006), and high surgeon volume (OR 0.574; p = 0.006). BPC (OR 1.013; p = 0.044), pT3a (OR 4.832; p < 0.0001) and pT3b stage (OR 5.153; p = 0.001) were independent predictors of the risk of non-focal PSM. Surgeon volume was not a predictor of non-focal PSM (p = 0.224). Independent factors associated with the risk of BCR were baseline PSA (hazard ratio, HR 1.064; p = 0.004), BPC (HR 1.015; p = 0.027), ISUP biopsy grade group (BGG) 2/3 (HR 2.966; p 0.003) and BGG 4/5 (HR 3.122; p = 0.022) pathologic grade group 4/5 (HR 3.257; p = 0.001), pT3b (HR 2.900; p = 0.003), and non-focal PSM (HR 2.287; p = 0.012). Surgeon volume was not a predictor of BCR (p = 0.253). High surgeon volume is an independent factor that lowers the risk of focal PSM. Surgeon volume does not affect non-focal PSM and BCR. Negative as well as focal PSM are not associated with BCR.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估外科医生手术量以及将阳性手术切缘(PSM)分为局灶性和非局灶性是否会对机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)后生化复发(BCR)的风险产生不同影响。在2013年1月至2017年12月期间,对732例连续患者进行了评估。研究人群包括阴性病例(对照组)和PSM患者(研究组)。PSM被分为局灶性(≤1mm)或非局灶性(>1mm)。采用逻辑回归模型评估各因素与PSM风险的独立关联。通过Cox多变量比例风险模型评估PSM和其他因素的BCR风险。总体而言,192例(26.3%)患者有PSM,其中133例为局灶性;59例为非局灶性。局灶性PSM与活检阳性核心比例(BPC;OR 1.011;p = 0.015)、包膜外侵犯(pT3a期;OR 2.064;p = 0.016)、精囊侵犯(pT3b;OR 2.150;p = 0.010)、体重指数(比值比,OR 0.914;p = 0.006)以及高手术量的外科医生(OR 0.574;p = 0.006)相关。BPC(OR 1.013;p = 0.044)、pT3a(OR 4.832;p < 0.0001)和pT3b期(OR 5.153;p = 0.001)是非局灶性PSM风险的独立预测因素。外科医生手术量不是非局灶性PSM的预测因素(p = 0.224)。与BCR风险相关的独立因素包括基线前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)(风险比,HR 1.064;p = 0.004)、BPC(HR 1.015;p = 0.027)、国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)活检分级组(BGG)2/3(HR 2.966;p 0.003)和BGG 4/5(HR 3.122;p = 0.022)、病理分级组4/5(HR 3.257;p = 0.001)、pT3b(HR 2.900;p = 0.003)以及非局灶性PSM(HR 2.287;p = 0.012)。外科医生手术量不是BCR的预测因素(p = 0.253)。高手术量的外科医生是降低局灶性PSM风险的独立因素。外科医生手术量不影响非局灶性PSM和BCR。阴性以及局灶性PSM与BCR无关。

相似文献

1
Linear extent of positive surgical margin impacts biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a high-volume center.在高容量中心,机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后手术切缘阳性的线性范围对生化复发有影响。
J Robot Surg. 2020 Aug;14(4):663-675. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-01039-5. Epub 2020 Jan 1.
2
Surgeon volume and body mass index influence positive surgical margin risk after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Results in 732 cases.外科医生手术量和体重指数对机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性风险的影响:732例病例结果
Arab J Urol. 2019 May 30;17(3):234-242. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2019.1619276. eCollection 2019.
3
High surgeon volume and positive surgical margins can predict the risk of biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.高手术医生手术量和手术切缘阳性可预测机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发的风险。
Ther Adv Urol. 2019 Sep 24;11:1756287219878283. doi: 10.1177/1756287219878283. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
4
Superior Biochemical Recurrence and Long-term Quality-of-life Outcomes Are Achievable with Robotic Radical Prostatectomy After a Long Learning Curve-Updated Analysis of a Prospective Single-surgeon Cohort of 2206 Consecutive Cases.机器人根治性前列腺切除术在长期学习曲线后可实现优越的生化复发和长期生活质量结局——2206 例连续病例的前瞻性单外科医生队列的更新分析。
Eur Urol. 2018 May;73(5):664-671. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.11.035. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
5
Risk of biochemical recurrence based on extent and location of positive surgical margins after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.基于机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后阳性手术切缘的范围和位置的生化复发风险。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Dec 27;18(1):1291. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-5229-1.
6
The impact of length and location of positive margins in predicting biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.在机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后,至少随访 5 年,阳性切缘的长度和位置对预测生化复发的影响。
BJU Int. 2015 Jan;115(1):106-13. doi: 10.1111/bju.12483.
7
Predictive factors and oncological outcomes of persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen in patients following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后患者前列腺特异性抗原持续升高的预测因素及肿瘤学结局
J Robot Surg. 2017 Mar;11(1):37-45. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0606-8. Epub 2016 May 31.
8
Risk factors of positive surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in high-volume center: results in 732 cases.高容量中心机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性的危险因素:732 例结果。
J Robot Surg. 2020 Feb;14(1):167-175. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-00954-x. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
9
Number of positive preoperative biopsy cores is a predictor of positive surgical margins (PSM) in small prostates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).术前活检阳性核心灶数量是机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后小前列腺患者手术切缘阳性(PSM)的一个预测指标。
BJU Int. 2015 Dec;116(6):897-904. doi: 10.1111/bju.12888. Epub 2015 Jun 2.
10
Prediction of a positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术术后切缘阳性和生化复发的预测。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 12;11(1):14329. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93860-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factors and risk-stratification model of biochemical failure in patients with positive surgical margin after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后手术切缘阳性患者生化复发的危险因素及风险分层模型
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jun 4;19(1):261. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02426-x.
2
Overall Survival and Cancer-Specific Mortality in Patients with Prostate Cancer Undergoing Definitive Therapies: A Narrative Review.接受确定性治疗的前列腺癌患者的总生存期和癌症特异性死亡率:一项叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 19;13(18):5561. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185561.
3
The impact of positive surgical margin parameters and pathological stage on biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
根治性前列腺切除术后阳性切缘参数和病理分期对生化复发的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 11;19(7):e0301653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301653. eCollection 2024.
4
Development of risk-score model in patients with negative surgical margin after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助前列腺根治术后切缘阴性患者风险评分模型的建立。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 31;14(1):7607. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58279-1.
5
The impact of prognostic group classification on prostate cancer progression in intermediate-risk patients according to the European Association of Urology system: results in 479 patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy at a single tertiary referral center.根据欧洲泌尿外科协会系统,预后分组分类对中危前列腺癌患者疾病进展的影响:单中心三级转诊中心479例行机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术患者的结果
Ther Adv Urol. 2024 Feb 11;16:17562872241229260. doi: 10.1177/17562872241229260. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
6
A Phase I Dose Escalation and Expansion Study of Epidiolex (Cannabidiol) in Patients with Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer.一项关于 Epidiolex(大麻二酚)在生化复发前列腺癌患者中的 I 期剂量递增与扩展研究。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Apr 27;15(9):2505. doi: 10.3390/cancers15092505.
7
Length of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: Does size matter? - A systematic review and meta-analysis.根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性长度:大小是否重要?——系统评价和荟萃分析。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2023 Dec;26(4):673-680. doi: 10.1038/s41391-023-00654-6. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
8
Association between ABO blood group and unfavorable prostate cancer features after radical prostatectomy: Retrospective study of 1149 patients.前列腺癌根治术后ABO血型与不良前列腺癌特征之间的关联:对1149例患者的回顾性研究
Curr Urol. 2022 Dec;16(4):256-261. doi: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000146. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
9
Radical or Not-So-Radical Prostatectomy: Do Surgical Margins Matter?根治性或非根治性前列腺切除术:手术切缘重要吗?
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Dec 21;14(1):13. doi: 10.3390/cancers14010013.
10
ABO blood group system and risk of positive surgical margins in patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: results in 1114 consecutive patients.ABO 血型系统与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术患者切缘阳性的风险:1114 例连续患者的结果。
J Robot Surg. 2022 Jun;16(3):507-516. doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01267-8. Epub 2021 Jun 29.