Department of Viral Hepatitis and AIDS, The L.V. Gromashevskyi Institute of Epidemiology and Infectious Disease, Kiev, Ukraine.
J Viral Hepat. 2020 May;27(5):548-551. doi: 10.1111/jvh.13254. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
The use of direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) in patients with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection results in sustained virologic response (SVR) rates of 95%-97%, but 3%-5% of patients experience virologic failure. We observed 17 patients infected with HCV subtype 1b who failed previous treatment with DAA, including 13 subjects (76.5%) with liver cirrhosis. Twelve subjects (70.6%) previously received NS5A inhibitors of the first generation (ledipasvir or daclatasvir) and five subjects (29.4%) - the second generation (velpatasvir). All patients were retreated with a combination of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir and dasabuvir (3D) with sofosbuvir (SOF) and ribavirin (RBV). We compared SVR rates depending on fibrosis stage, presence of just single or double NS5A mutations (L31M/V/I and/or Y93H), and on the generation of previously used NS5A inhibitor. Observed SVR rates were as follows: 94.1% (16/17 patients) overall; 100% in patients without cirrhosis (n = 4) vs 92.3% in those with cirrhosis (n = 13); 100% with single L31M/V/I or Y93H mutation (n = 7) vs 88.9% with double mutations (n = 9); 100% in patients who previously failed first generation (n = 12) vs 80.0% in those failed second-generation NS5A inhibitors (n = 5). Retreatment with 3D + 0SOF + RBV was highly effective and safe in patients with chronic HCV GT1b infection who failed previous use of NS5A inhibitors. Fibrosis stage, baseline presence of NS5A RAS mutations and the generation of previously used NS5A inhibitors may impact the probability of achieving SVR , but statistical significance was not demonstrated in our small retrospective cohort. Further studies in a larger population are needed to confirm or not the predictive value of these baseline factors.
在慢性 HCV 基因型 1 感染患者中使用直接作用抗病毒药物 (DAA) 可使持续病毒学应答 (SVR) 率达到 95%-97%,但仍有 3%-5%的患者出现病毒学失败。我们观察了 17 例感染 HCV 亚型 1b 的患者,这些患者先前使用 DAA 治疗失败,其中包括 13 例(76.5%)肝硬化患者。12 例(70.6%)患者先前接受过第一代 NS5A 抑制剂(ledipasvir 或 daclatasvir),5 例(29.4%)接受过第二代 NS5A 抑制剂(velpatasvir)。所有患者均接受 ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir 和 dasabuvir(3D)联合 sofosbuvir(SOF)和利巴韦林(RBV)治疗。我们根据纤维化阶段、是否存在单一或双重 NS5A 突变(L31M/V/I 和/或 Y93H)以及先前使用的 NS5A 抑制剂的代际来比较 SVR 率。观察到的 SVR 率如下:总体为 94.1%(17 例患者中的 16 例);无肝硬化患者为 100%(n=4),肝硬化患者为 92.3%(n=13);单一 L31M/V/I 或 Y93H 突变患者为 100%(n=7),双重突变患者为 88.9%(n=9);第一代 NS5A 抑制剂治疗失败的患者为 100%(n=12),第二代 NS5A 抑制剂治疗失败的患者为 80.0%(n=5)。在先前使用 NS5A 抑制剂治疗失败的慢性 HCV GT1b 感染患者中,使用 3D+0SOF+RBV 进行再治疗是非常有效且安全的。纤维化阶段、基线时存在 NS5A RAS 突变以及先前使用的 NS5A 抑制剂的代际可能会影响获得 SVR 的概率,但在我们的小回顾性队列中未显示出统计学意义。需要在更大的人群中进行进一步的研究,以确认或否定这些基线因素的预测价值。