Ouyang Zenhwa, Sargeant Jan, Thomas Alison, Wycherley Kate, Ma Rebecca, Esmaeilbeigi Rosa, Versluis Ali, Stacey Deborah, Stone Elizabeth, Poljak Zvonimir, Bernardo Theresa M
Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Centre for Public Health and Zoonoses, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Anim Health Res Rev. 2019 Jun;20(1):1-18. doi: 10.1017/S1466252319000136.
Research in big data, informatics, and bioinformatics has grown dramatically (Andreu-Perez J, et al., 2015, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics 19, 1193-1208). Advances in gene sequencing technologies, surveillance systems, and electronic medical records have increased the amount of health data available. Unconventional data sources such as social media, wearable sensors, and internet search engine activity have also contributed to the influx of health data. The purpose of this study was to describe how 'big data', 'informatics', and 'bioinformatics' have been used in the animal health and veterinary medical literature and to map and chart publications using these terms through time. A scoping review methodology was used. A literature search of the terms 'big data', 'informatics', and 'bioinformatics' was conducted in the context of animal health and veterinary medicine. Relevance screening on abstract and full-text was conducted sequentially. In order for articles to be relevant, they must have used the words 'big data', 'informatics', or 'bioinformatics' in the title or abstract and full-text and have dealt with one of the major animal species encountered in veterinary medicine. Data items collected for all relevant articles included species, geographic region, first author affiliation, and journal of publication. The study level, study type, and data sources were collected for primary studies. After relevance screening, 1093 were classified. While there was a steady increase in 'bioinformatics' articles between 1995 and the end of the study period, 'informatics' articles reached their peak in 2012, then declined. The first 'big data' publication in animal health and veterinary medicine was in 2012. While few articles used the term 'big data' (n = 14), recent growth in 'big data' articles was observed. All geographic regions produced publications in 'informatics' and 'bioinformatics' while only North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia/Oceania produced publications about 'big data'. 'Bioinformatics' primary studies tended to use genetic data and tended to be conducted at the genetic level. In contrast, 'informatics' primary studies tended to use non-genetic data sources and conducted at an organismal level. The rapidly evolving definition of 'big data' may lead to avoidance of the term.
大数据、信息学和生物信息学方面的研究有了显著增长(安德鲁 - 佩雷斯 J 等人,2015 年,《IEEE 生物医学与健康信息学杂志》19 卷,1193 - 1208 页)。基因测序技术、监测系统和电子病历的进步增加了可用健康数据的数量。社交媒体、可穿戴传感器和互联网搜索引擎活动等非常规数据来源也促使健康数据大量涌入。本研究的目的是描述“大数据”“信息学”和“生物信息学”在动物健康和兽医学文献中的使用方式,并绘制这些术语随时间变化的出版物图谱。采用了一种范围综述方法。在动物健康和兽医学背景下,对“大数据”“信息学”和“生物信息学”等术语进行了文献检索。依次对摘要和全文进行相关性筛选。为使文章具有相关性,其标题、摘要或全文中必须使用“大数据”“信息学”或“生物信息学”这些词,并且涉及兽医学中常见的主要动物物种之一。为所有相关文章收集的数据项包括物种、地理区域、第一作者所属机构以及发表期刊。对于原始研究,收集了研究水平、研究类型和数据来源。经过相关性筛选,共分类了 1093 篇文章。虽然 1995 年至研究期末“生物信息学”文章稳步增加,但“信息学”文章在 2012 年达到峰值,随后下降。动物健康和兽医学领域的第一篇“大数据”出版物发表于 2012 年。虽然使用“大数据”一词的文章很少(n = 14),但观察到“大数据”文章近期有所增长。所有地理区域都有关于“信息学”和“生物信息学”的出版物,而只有北美、欧洲、亚洲以及澳大利亚/大洋洲有关于“大数据”的出版物。“生物信息学”原始研究倾向于使用基因数据,且倾向于在基因层面进行。相比之下,“信息学”原始研究倾向于使用非基因数据源,并在生物体层面进行。“大数据”定义的快速演变可能导致该术语被回避。