• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

质子泵抑制剂停药对房颤患者达比加群酯血浆水平的影响:一项洗脱研究。

The Effect of Proton Pump Inhibitor Withdrawal on Dabigatran Etexilate Plasma Levels in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Washout Study.

机构信息

Departments of Gastroenterology; and.

Internal Medicine I, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, Martin, Slovak Republic; and.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2020 Apr;75(4):333-335. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000000791.

DOI:10.1097/FJC.0000000000000791
PMID:31895873
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several studies demonstrated that proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) co-administrated with dabigatran in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) decreased dabigatran trough and peak plasma levels. However, it is still unknown whether this interaction is reversible or not, and whether the withdrawal of PPI would lead to normalization of dabigatran plasma levels.

AIM OF STUDY

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of PPI withdrawal on dabigatran plasma levels in patients with AF.

METHODS

This pilot prospective study enrolled 23 AF patients on long-term dabigatran and PPI therapy (omeprazole 20 mg twice daily or pantoprazole 40 mg once daily). Dabigatran trough and peak levels (ng/mL) were tested on PPI and after a 2-week period of PPI withdrawal with Hemoclot Thrombin Inhibitor Assay.

RESULTS

The analysis of dabigatran plasma levels demonstrated significant elevation in trough dabigatran levels after 2 weeks of PPI withdrawal (97.2 ± 79.7 vs. 163.8 ± 105.5 ng/mL; P < 0.05). Moreover, significantly higher peak dabigatran levels were observed after 2 weeks of PPI withdrawal (142.4 ± 102.8 vs. 255 ± 129.5 ng/mL; P ≤ 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that a 2-week period of PPI withdrawal lead to a significant increase in dabigatran trough and peak plasma levels in patients with AF.

摘要

背景

几项研究表明,质子泵抑制剂 (PPI) 与房颤 (AF) 患者同时使用达比加群会降低达比加群的谷值和峰值血浆水平。然而,目前尚不清楚这种相互作用是否可逆,以及停用 PPI 是否会导致达比加群的血浆水平恢复正常。

目的

本研究旨在确定 AF 患者停用 PPI 对达比加群血浆水平的影响。

方法

这项前瞻性研究纳入了 23 例长期接受达比加群和 PPI(奥美拉唑 20mg,每日两次或泮托拉唑 40mg,每日一次)治疗的 AF 患者。用 Hemoclot 凝血酶抑制剂检测法检测 PPI 时和停用 PPI 2 周后的达比加群谷值和峰值(ng/mL)。

结果

达比加群血浆水平分析显示,停用 PPI 2 周后达比加群的谷值水平显著升高(97.2±79.7 比 163.8±105.5ng/mL;P<0.05)。此外,停用 PPI 2 周后,达比加群的峰值水平显著升高(142.4±102.8 比 255±129.5ng/mL;P≤0.001)。

结论

本研究表明,停用 PPI 2 周可导致 AF 患者达比加群的谷值和峰值血浆水平显著升高。

相似文献

1
The Effect of Proton Pump Inhibitor Withdrawal on Dabigatran Etexilate Plasma Levels in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Washout Study.质子泵抑制剂停药对房颤患者达比加群酯血浆水平的影响:一项洗脱研究。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2020 Apr;75(4):333-335. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000000791.
2
The Impact of Proton Pump Inhibition on Dabigatran Levels in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.质子泵抑制剂对房颤患者达比加群水平的影响。
Am J Ther. 2019 May/Jun;26(3):e308-e313. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000000599.
3
Dabigatran levels in omeprazole versus pantoprazole-treated patients with atrial fibrillation: is there a difference?接受奥美拉唑与泮托拉唑治疗的房颤患者中达比加群的血药浓度:有差异吗?
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Jun;75(6):875-877. doi: 10.1007/s00228-019-02647-8. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
4
Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics of Dabigatran 75 mg Twice Daily in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation and Severely Impaired Renal Function.达比加群酯75毫克每日两次在非瓣膜性心房颤动且肾功能严重受损患者中的药代动力学/药效学研究
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Sep;23(5):399-406. doi: 10.1177/1074248418769167. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
5
Real-world variability in dabigatran levels in patients with atrial fibrillation.真实世界中房颤患者达比加群水平的变异性。
J Thromb Haemost. 2015 Mar;13(3):353-9. doi: 10.1111/jth.12823. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
6
Factors Affecting Trough Plasma Dabigatran Concentrations in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Chronic Kidney Disease.影响心房颤动合并慢性肾脏病患者达比加群谷浓度的因素
High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2020 Apr;27(2):151-156. doi: 10.1007/s40292-020-00373-2. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
7
Adherence to dabigatran etexilate in atrial fibrillation patients intended to undergo electrical cardioversion.达比加群酯在拟行电复律的心房颤动患者中的应用依从性。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2019 Apr 1;5(2):91-99. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvy047.
8
Monitoring of dabigatran therapy using Hemoclot(®) Thrombin Inhibitor assay in patients with atrial fibrillation.使用Hemoclot(®)凝血酶抑制剂检测法监测心房颤动患者的达比加群治疗情况。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2015 Jan;39(1):95-100. doi: 10.1007/s11239-014-1125-y.
9
Dabigatran Levels in Elderly Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: First Post-Marketing Experiences.老年房颤患者的达比加群水平:上市后首次经验
Drugs Aging. 2018 Jun;35(6):539-544. doi: 10.1007/s40266-018-0552-4.
10
The assessment of anticoagulant activity to predict bleeding outcome in atrial fibrillation patients receiving dabigatran etexilate.评估接受达比加群酯的心房颤动患者的抗凝活性以预测出血结局。
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2016 Jun;27(4):389-95. doi: 10.1097/MBC.0000000000000558.

引用本文的文献

1
Usual On-therapy Ranges of Drug Concentrations in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Treated with Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.直接口服抗凝剂治疗心房颤动患者的药物浓度通常治疗范围:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Thromb Haemost. 2025 Jun;125(6):563-573. doi: 10.1055/a-2446-1348. Epub 2024 Nov 21.
2
Drug-Drug Interactions of Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs): From Pharmacological to Clinical Practice.直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)的药物相互作用:从药理学到临床实践
Pharmaceutics. 2022 May 24;14(6):1120. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14061120.
3
Association of direct oral anticoagulant-proton pump inhibitor cotherapy with adverse outcomes: protocol for a population-based cohort study.
直接口服抗凝剂-质子泵抑制剂联合治疗与不良结局的关联:一项基于人群的队列研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 13;12(6):e057991. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057991.
4
Closure Device-Related Thrombosis After Anticoagulation With Dabigatran in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Case Reports and Literature Review.达比加群抗凝治疗后经皮左心耳封堵患者的封堵装置相关血栓形成:病例报告与文献综述
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Sep 8;11:563920. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.563920. eCollection 2020.