Suppr超能文献

切除痔术后的局部镇痛:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Topical analgesia following excisional haemorrhoidectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

机构信息

South Auckland Clinical Campus, Middlemore Hospital, Private Bag 93311, Otahuhu, Auckland, New Zealand.

Department of Surgery, South Auckland Clinical Campus, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Feb;35(2):181-197. doi: 10.1007/s00384-019-03497-7. Epub 2020 Jan 2.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Post-operative pain following excisional haemorrhoidectomy poses a particular challenge for patient recovery, as well as a burden on hospital resources. There appears to be an increasing role for topical agents to improve this pain, but their efficacy and safety have not been fully assessed. This systematic review aims to assess all topical agents used for pain following excisional haemorrhoidectomy.

METHODS

The study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Two authors independently assessed MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases to 27 June 2019. All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in English that investigated topical agents following excisional haemorrhoidectomy were included. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager, version 5.3.

RESULTS

A total of 3639 records were identified. A final 32 RCTs were included in the qualitative analysis. Meta-analysis was performed on 9 RCTs that investigated glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) (5 for diltiazem, 2 for metronidazole and 2 for sucralfate). There were mixed significant changes in pain for GTN compared with placebo. Diltiazem resulted in significant reduction of pain on post-operative days 1, 2, 3 and 7 (p < 0.00001). Metronidazole resulted in significant reduction of pain on days 1 (p = 0.009), 7 (p = 0.002) and 14 (p < 0.00001). Sucralfate resulted in signification reduction of pain on days 7 and 14 (both p < 0.00001).

CONCLUSION

Topical diltiazem, metronidazole and sucralfate appear to significantly reduce pain at various timepoints following excisional haemorrhoidectomy. GTN had mixed evidence. Several single trials identified other promising topical analgesics.

摘要

目的

痔切除术(excisional haemorrhoidectomy)后出现的术后疼痛对患者的康复带来了特殊的挑战,也给医院资源带来了负担。似乎有越来越多的局部用药可以改善这种疼痛,但它们的疗效和安全性尚未得到充分评估。本系统评价旨在评估所有用于痔切除术(excisional haemorrhoidectomy)后疼痛的局部用药。

方法

该研究根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行。两名作者独立评估了 2019 年 6 月 27 日前的 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 CENTRAL 数据库。所有以英语发表的、关于痔切除术(excisional haemorrhoidectomy)后局部用药的随机对照试验(RCT)均被纳入。使用 Review Manager 版本 5.3 进行荟萃分析。

结果

共确定了 3639 条记录。最终纳入了 32 项定性分析 RCT。对 9 项研究(5 项研究使用硝酸甘油(glyceryl trinitrate,GTN),2 项研究使用地尔硫卓,2 项研究使用硫酸蔗糖)进行了荟萃分析。与安慰剂相比,GTN 在疼痛方面有混合的显著变化。地尔硫卓在术后第 1、2、3 和 7 天显著减轻疼痛(p < 0.00001)。甲硝唑在第 1 天(p = 0.009)、第 7 天(p = 0.002)和第 14 天(p < 0.00001)显著减轻疼痛。蔗糖硫酸酯在第 7 天和第 14 天显著减轻疼痛(均 p < 0.00001)。

结论

局部使用地尔硫卓、甲硝唑和蔗糖硫酸酯似乎可以在痔切除术(excisional haemorrhoidectomy)后不同时间点显著减轻疼痛。GTN 的证据存在差异。一些单独的试验发现了其他有前途的局部镇痛药。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验