Suppr超能文献

痔切除术术后应用甲硝唑减轻术后疼痛的疗效:系统评价。

Topical metronidazole after haemorrhoidectomy to reduce postoperative pain: a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Rome "Sapienza", Viale Regina Elena 324, 00161, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Updates Surg. 2024 Aug;76(4):1161-1167. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01930-3. Epub 2024 Aug 8.

Abstract

Excisional haemorrhoidectomy is the gold standard for operating haemorrhoids, but it is accompanied by a significant problem: postoperative pain. Several strategies have been adopted to minimize this condition. Oral metronidazole has been proven to reduce postoperative pain but with some complications. This systematic review was conducted to investigate the effects and general efficacy of topical metronidazole administration and to evaluate its potential superiority over the oral formula. A systematic review of the literature was carried out. Randomized controlled trials published until September 2023 on PubMed, Central, and Web of Science were considered. The primary outcome considered was postoperative pain, which was evaluated using visual analogue scores. The secondary outcomes were analgesic use, return to work, and complications. Six randomized controlled trials were included, with a total of 536 patients. Topical metronidazole was compared with placebo in two studies, with oral formula in three studies, and with placebo and oral administration in one study. Topical metronidazole was found to be effective for treating postoperative pain when compared to a placebo but had no significant advantage over the oral formula. No complications were reported in the studies. Topical and oral metronidazole are effective solutions for postoperative pain after excisional haemorrhoidectomy. No superiority was demonstrated based on the route of administration, and complications were marginal for both formulas. Further studies are required to determine the best metronidazole solution.

摘要

痔切除术是治疗痔的金标准,但它伴随着一个显著的问题:术后疼痛。已经采取了几种策略来最小化这种情况。口服甲硝唑已被证明可以减轻术后疼痛,但有一些并发症。本系统评价旨在研究局部甲硝唑给药的效果和总体疗效,并评估其相对于口服配方的潜在优势。进行了文献的系统评价。考虑了截至 2023 年 9 月在 PubMed、Central 和 Web of Science 上发表的随机对照试验。主要结局是术后疼痛,使用视觉模拟评分进行评估。次要结局是镇痛药的使用、恢复工作和并发症。纳入了 6 项随机对照试验,共有 536 名患者。在两项研究中,将局部甲硝唑与安慰剂进行了比较,在三项研究中与口服配方进行了比较,在一项研究中与安慰剂和口服给药进行了比较。与安慰剂相比,局部甲硝唑在治疗痔切除术后疼痛方面是有效的,但与口服配方相比没有显著优势。研究中没有报告任何并发症。局部和口服甲硝唑都是痔切除术术后疼痛的有效治疗方法。根据给药途径没有显示出优越性,两种配方的并发症都较少。需要进一步的研究来确定最佳的甲硝唑溶液。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fa8/11341760/30dc6ee20a21/13304_2024_1930_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验