• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者传导障碍的临床影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Clinical impact of conduction disturbances in transcatheter aortic valve replacement recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Faroux Laurent, Chen Shmuel, Muntané-Carol Guillem, Regueiro Ander, Philippon Francois, Sondergaard Lars, Jørgensen Troels H, Lopez-Aguilera José, Kodali Susheel, Leon Martin, Nazif Tamim, Rodés-Cabau Josep

机构信息

Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, 2725 chemin Ste-Foy, Quebec City, Quebec G1V4G5, Canada.

Columbia University Medical Center, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, 177 Fort Washington Avenue, New York, NY 10032, USA.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 2020 Aug 1;41(29):2771-2781. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz924.

DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz924
PMID:31899484
Abstract

AIMS

The clinical impact of new-onset persistent left bundle branch block (NOP-LBBB) and permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) on transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) recipients remains controversial. We aimed to evaluate the impact of (i) periprocedural NOP-LBBB and PPI post-TAVR on 1-year all-cause death, cardiac death, and heart failure hospitalization and (ii) NOP-LBBB on the need for PPI at 1-year follow-up.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a systematic search from PubMed and EMBASE databases for studies reporting raw data on 1-year clinical impact of NOP-LBBB or periprocedural PPI post-TAVR. Data from 30 studies, including 7792 patients (12 studies) and 42 927 patients (21 studies) for the evaluation of the impact of NOP-LBBB and PPI after TAVR were sourced, respectively. NOP-LBBB was associated with an increased risk of all-cause death [risk ratio (RR) 1.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17-1.49; P < 0.001], cardiac death (RR 1.46, 95% CI 1.20-1.78; P < 0.001), heart failure hospitalization (RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.05-1.72; P = 0.02), and PPI (RR 1.89, 95% CI 1.58-2.27; P < 0.001) at 1-year follow-up. Periprocedural PPI after TAVR was associated with a higher risk of all-cause death (RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.11-1.25; P < 0.001) and heart failure hospitalization (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.03-1.36; P = 0.02). Permanent pacemaker implantation was not associated with an increased risk of cardiac death (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.67-1.05; P = 0.13).

CONCLUSION

NOP-LBBB and PPI after TAVR are associated with an increased risk of all-cause death and heart failure hospitalization at 1-year follow-up. Periprocedural NOP-LBBB also increased the risk of cardiac death and PPI within the year following the procedure. Further studies are urgently warranted to enhance preventive measures and optimize the management of conduction disturbances post-TAVR.

摘要

目的

新发持续性左束支传导阻滞(NOP-LBBB)和永久性起搏器植入(PPI)对经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)接受者的临床影响仍存在争议。我们旨在评估(i)TAVR围手术期NOP-LBBB和术后PPI对1年全因死亡、心源性死亡和心力衰竭住院的影响,以及(ii)NOP-LBBB对1年随访时PPI需求的影响。

方法和结果

我们在PubMed和EMBASE数据库中进行了系统检索,以查找报告NOP-LBBB或TAVR术后围手术期PPI的1年临床影响原始数据的研究。分别获取了30项研究的数据,其中包括7792例患者(12项研究)和42927例患者(21项研究),用于评估TAVR后NOP-LBBB和PPI的影响。在1年随访时,NOP-LBBB与全因死亡风险增加相关[风险比(RR)1.32,95%置信区间(CI)1.17-1.49;P<0.001]、心源性死亡(RR 1.46,95%CI 1.20-1.78;P<0.001)、心力衰竭住院(RR 1.35,95%CI 1.05-1.72;P = 0.02)以及PPI(RR 1.89,95%CI 1.58-2.27;P<0.001)。TAVR术后围手术期PPI与全因死亡风险较高相关(RR 1.17,95%CI 1.11-1.25;P<0.001)和心力衰竭住院(RR 1.18,95%CI 1.03-1.36;P = 0.02)。永久性起搏器植入与心源性死亡风险增加无关(RR 0.84,95%CI 0.67-1.05;P = 0.13)。

结论

TAVR术后NOP-LBBB和PPI与1年随访时全因死亡和心力衰竭住院风险增加相关。围手术期NOP-LBBB在术后一年内也增加了心源性死亡和PPI的风险。迫切需要进一步研究以加强预防措施并优化TAVR后传导障碍的管理。

相似文献

1
Clinical impact of conduction disturbances in transcatheter aortic valve replacement recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者传导障碍的临床影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2020 Aug 1;41(29):2771-2781. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz924.
2
Impact of New-Onset Left Bundle Branch Block and Periprocedural Permanent Pacemaker Implantation on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后新发左束支传导阻滞和经皮心脏永久起搏器植入对患者临床结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 May;9(5):e003635. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003635.
3
Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With New-Onset Persistent Left Bundle Branch Block Following TAVR.经 TAVR 治疗后新发持续性左束支传导阻滞患者的长期结局。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jun 24;12(12):1175-1184. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.03.025. Epub 2019 May 22.
4
Impact of new-onset persistent left bundle branch block on late clinical outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a balloon-expandable valve.球囊扩张式经导管主动脉瓣置换术后新发持续性左束支传导阻滞对患者晚期临床结局的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Feb;7(2):128-136. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.015. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
5
Impact of Preexisting Left Bundle Branch Block in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Recipients.经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者左束支传导阻滞的影响。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Nov;11(11):e006927. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.006927.
6
Incidence of Persistent Left Bundle Branch Block After Rapid-Deployment Aortic Valve Replacement.主动脉瓣置换术后持续性左束支传导阻滞的发生率。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2023 Jun;115(6):1446-1454. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.07.038. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
7
Clinical implications of new-onset left bundle branch block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: analysis of the PARTNER experience.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后新发左束支传导阻滞的临床意义:PARTNER 经验分析。
Eur Heart J. 2014 Jun 21;35(24):1599-607. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht376. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
8
A single-centre cohort and short-term follow-up of patients who developed persistent new onset left bundle branch block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后持续性新发左束支传导阻滞患者的单中心队列和短期随访。
Acta Cardiol. 2020 Aug;75(4):360-365. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2020.1713520. Epub 2020 Jan 26.
9
New-onset persistent left bundle branch block following sutureless aortic valve replacement.无缝合主动脉瓣置换术后新发持续性左束支传导阻滞
Heart. 2022 Dec 22;109(2):143-150. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321191.
10
New-onset left bundle branch block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement is associated with adverse long-term clinical outcomes in intermediate-risk patients: an analysis from the PARTNER II trial.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后新发左束支传导阻滞与中危患者不良长期临床结局相关:来自 PARTNER II 试验的分析。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Jul 14;40(27):2218-2227. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz227.

引用本文的文献

1
Transcatheter versus minimally invasive surgical aortic valve replacement: A propensity score-matched analysis in low-risk patients.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与微创外科主动脉瓣置换术:低风险患者的倾向评分匹配分析
JTCVS Open. 2025 May 9;26:75-84. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2025.05.001. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Prediction and impact of high burden of ventricular pacing in patients with pacemaker after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后起搏器植入患者心室起搏高负担的预测及影响
Heart Rhythm O2. 2025 May 27;6(8):1070-1076. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2025.05.024. eCollection 2025 Aug.
3
Cusp-overlap view versus three cusp coplanar view during transcatheter aortic valve replacement using self-expandable valves: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression.
使用自膨胀瓣膜进行经导管主动脉瓣置换术时的瓣叶重叠视图与三尖瓣共面视图:一项系统评价、荟萃分析和荟萃回归
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Aug 21;25(1):619. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-05009-8.
4
Incidence and Predictors of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: .经导管主动脉瓣置换术后永久性起搏器植入的发生率及预测因素:.
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2025 May 2;25(1):209-217. doi: 10.18295/2075-0528.2831.
5
Management of conduction disturbances after TAVI: the last step towards early discharge.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后传导障碍的管理:迈向早期出院的最后一步。
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2025 May 28;22(5):534-546. doi: 10.26599/1671-5411.2025.05.004.
6
One-year Outcomes of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: CONDUCT Registry: A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后永久性起搏器植入的一年结局:CONDUCT注册研究:一项倾向评分匹配比较
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2025 Jun 24;14:e14. doi: 10.15420/aer.2024.52. eCollection 2025.
7
Outcomes of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in Patients with Pure Aortic Regurgitation after TAVI.经导管主动脉瓣置入术后单纯主动脉瓣反流患者永久性起搏器植入的结局
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025 May 22;26(5):26543. doi: 10.31083/RCM26543. eCollection 2025 May.
8
A Retrospective Analysis Assessing Paravalvular Leak and Pacemaker Implantation Using TEE and Non-Contrast CT for CKD Patients Compared With CT Angiography for Annular Sizing Pre-TAVR.一项回顾性分析,评估使用经食管超声心动图(TEE)和非增强CT对慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者进行人工瓣膜周漏及起搏器植入情况,并与CT血管造影术用于经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)术前瓣环测量进行比较。
Health Sci Rep. 2025 May 22;8(5):e70847. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70847. eCollection 2025 May.
9
Impact of Noncoaxial Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation on Clinical Outcomes.非同轴经导管主动脉瓣植入术对临床结局的影响。
JACC Adv. 2025 May 22;4(6 Pt 1):101834. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101834.
10
Impact of Aortic Valve Leaflets Calcium Volume and Distribution on Post-TAVR Conduction Abnormalities.主动脉瓣叶钙含量及分布对经导管主动脉瓣置换术后传导异常的影响
medRxiv. 2025 May 6:2025.05.04.25326961. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.04.25326961.