Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sportsmedicine, Valiant Clinic/Houston Methodist, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Woodinville, Washington, U.S.A.
Arthroscopy. 2020 Feb;36(2):501-512. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.08.014. Epub 2019 Dec 31.
The purpose of this study was to perform an evidence-based, expert consensus survey using the Delphi panel methodology to develop recommendations for the treatment of degenerative meniscus tears.
Twenty panel members were asked to respond to 10 open-ended questions in rounds 1 and 2. The results of the first 2 rounds served to develop a Likert-style questionnaire for round 3. In round 4, the panel members outside consensus were contacted and asked to either change their score in view of the group's response or argue their case. The level of agreement for round 4 was defined as 80%.
There was 100% agreement on the following items: insidious onset, physiological part of aging, tears often multiplanar, not all tears cause symptoms, outcomes depend on degree of osteoarthritis, obesity is a predictor of poor outcome, and younger patients (<50 years) have better outcomes. There was between 90% and 100% agreement on the following items: tears are nontraumatic, radiographs should be weightbearing, initial treatment should be conservative, platelet-rich plasma is not a good option, repairable and peripheral tears should be repaired, microfracture is not a good option for chondral defects, the majority of patients obtain significant improvement and decrease in pain with surgery but results are variable, short-term symptoms have better outcomes, and malalignment and root tears have poor outcomes.
This consensus statement agreed that degenerative meniscus tears are a normal part of aging. Not all tears cause symptoms and, when symptomatic, they should initially be treated nonoperatively. Repairable tears should be repaired. The outcome of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy depends on the degree of osteoarthritis, the character of the meniscus lesion, the degree of loss of joint space, the amount of malalignment, and obesity. The majority of patients had significant improvement, but younger patients and patients with short-term symptoms have better outcomes.
Level V - expert opinion.
本研究旨在采用德尔菲专家共识调查方法,对退行性半月板撕裂的治疗进行循证专家共识调查,制定相关推荐意见。
在第 1 轮和第 2 轮中,20 名专家组成员被要求回答 10 个开放性问题。第 1 轮和第 2 轮的结果用于制定第 3 轮的李克特式问卷。在第 4 轮中,对未达成共识的专家组成员进行联系,并要求他们根据专家组的意见改变评分,或提出自己的观点。第 4 轮的一致性水平定义为 80%。
以下项目得到了 100%的一致同意:隐匿性发病、生理老化的一部分、撕裂常为多平面、并非所有撕裂都会引起症状、结局取决于骨关节炎的严重程度、肥胖是不良结局的预测因素、年轻患者(<50 岁)结局更好。以下项目的一致率在 90%至 100%之间:撕裂为非外伤性、影像学检查应负重、初始治疗应保守、富含血小板的血浆不是一个好的选择、可修复的和周边撕裂应修复、微骨折术不是软骨缺损的好选择、大多数患者在手术后疼痛明显减轻,但结果各不相同、短期症状有更好的结果、对线不良和根撕裂的结果较差。
本共识声明认为,退行性半月板撕裂是衰老的正常表现。并非所有撕裂都会引起症状,当出现症状时,应首先进行非手术治疗。可修复的撕裂应进行修复。关节镜下部分半月板切除术的结局取决于骨关节炎的严重程度、半月板病变的特征、关节间隙丢失的程度、对线不良的程度以及肥胖程度。大多数患者都有明显的改善,但年轻患者和短期症状患者的结果更好。
V 级-专家意见。