Neuroradiology Department, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Lower Lane, Fazakerley, Liverpool, L9 7LJ, UK.
Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Prescot Street, Liverpool, L7 8XP, UK.
Neuroradiology. 2020 Mar;62(3):273-281. doi: 10.1007/s00234-019-02349-z. Epub 2020 Jan 4.
To determine whether the sensitivity and specificity of four-dimensional CTA (4D-CTA) are equivalent to digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in the detection of underlying vascular abnormalities in patients with intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH).
A systematic review of studies comparing 4D-CTA with DSA in the detection of the underlying structural causes of ICH was performed on the literature published between 1998 and 2019.
We identified a total of 237 articles from PubMed, SCOPUS and Web of Science using the following Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms: primary intracerebral haemorrhage, 4D-CTA, DSA, cerebral haemorrhage, angiography, digital subtraction, arteriovenous malformations, 4D, CTA, dynamic-CTA and time-resolved CTA. Following the removal of duplicate publications and articles failing to meet our inclusion criteria, there were four articles potentially viable for analysis. Therefore, there were not sufficient studies to provide a statistically meaningful meta-analysis.
The review of current literature has demonstrated that there are few published studies comparing 4D-CTA with DSA in spontaneous ICH, with only four suitable studies identified for potential analysis. However, due to the restricted number of patients and high sensitivity and specificity of 3 studies (100%), performing a meta-analysis was not meaningful. Qualitative analysis of the data concluded that 4D-CTA has the diagnostic potential to replace invasive DSA in certain cases with vascular abnormalities. However, further research studies directly comparing 4D-CTA with DSA using larger prospective patient cohorts are required to strengthen the evidence base.
确定四维 CTA(4D-CTA)在检测脑出血(ICH)患者潜在血管异常方面的敏感性和特异性是否与数字减影血管造影(DSA)相当。
对 1998 年至 2019 年期间发表的文献进行了系统评价,比较了 4D-CTA 与 DSA 在检测 ICH 潜在结构原因方面的研究。
我们从 PubMed、SCOPUS 和 Web of Science 中总共使用了以下医学主题词(MeSH)术语识别出 237 篇文章:原发性脑出血、4D-CTA、DSA、脑溢血、血管造影术、数字减影、动静脉畸形、4D、CTA、动态 CTA 和时间分辨 CTA。在去除重复出版物和不符合我们纳入标准的文章后,有 4 篇文章可能适合分析。因此,没有足够的研究提供具有统计学意义的荟萃分析。
对当前文献的综述表明,比较 4D-CTA 与自发性 ICH 中 DSA 的发表研究很少,只有 4 项适合潜在分析的研究。然而,由于患者数量有限且 3 项研究的敏感性和特异性均为 100%(100%),进行荟萃分析没有意义。对数据的定性分析得出结论,4D-CTA 具有在某些情况下替代有血管异常的侵袭性 DSA 的诊断潜力。然而,需要进一步的研究直接比较 4D-CTA 与 DSA 使用更大的前瞻性患者队列,以加强证据基础。