Seven Oaks General Hospital, Chronic Disease Innovation Centre, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Department of Internal Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2020 Jan;95(1):90-100. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.07.017.
To compare the safety of metformin vs sulfonylureas in patients with type 2 diabetes by chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage.
This retrospective cohort study included adults in Manitoba, Canada, with type 2 diabetes, an incident monotherapy prescription for metformin or a sulfonylurea, and a serum creatinine measurement from April 1, 2006, to March 31, 2017. Patients were stratified by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) into the following groups: eGFR of 90 or greater, 60 to 89, 45 to 59, 30 to 44, or less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m. Outcomes included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, and major hypoglycemic episodes. Baseline characteristics were used to calculate propensity scores and perform inverse probability of treatment weights analysis, and eGFR group was examined as an effect modifier for each outcome.
The cohort consisted of 21,996 individuals (19,990 metformin users and 2006 sulfonylurea users). Metformin use was associated with lower risk for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.48; 95% CI, 0.40-0.58; P<.001), cardiovascular events (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.52-0.86; P=.002), and major hypoglycemic episodes (HR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.09-0.20; P<.001) when compared with sulfonylureas. CKD was a significant effect modifier for all-cause mortality (P=.002), but not for cardiovascular events or major hypoglycemic episodes.
Sulfonylurea monotherapy is associated with higher risk for all-cause mortality, major hypoglycemic episodes, and cardiovascular events compared with metformin. Although the presence of CKD attenuated the mortality benefit, metformin may be a safer alternative to sulfonylureas in patients with CKD.
根据慢性肾脏病(CKD)分期比较 2 型糖尿病患者使用二甲双胍与磺酰脲类药物的安全性。
本回顾性队列研究纳入了 2006 年 4 月 1 日至 2017 年 3 月 31 日期间,在加拿大马尼托巴省患有 2 型糖尿病、使用单药二甲双胍或磺酰脲类药物治疗且血清肌酐测量值的成年人。根据估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)将患者分为以下组:eGFR 为 90 或以上、60 至 89、45 至 59、30 至 44 或小于 30 mL/min/1.73 m。结局包括全因死亡率、心血管事件和严重低血糖事件。使用基线特征计算倾向评分并进行逆概率治疗权重分析,并检查 eGFR 组对每个结局的效应修饰作用。
队列包括 21996 人(19990 例使用二甲双胍者和 2006 例使用磺酰脲类药物者)。与磺酰脲类药物相比,使用二甲双胍与全因死亡率(风险比 [HR],0.48;95%CI,0.40-0.58;P<.001)、心血管事件(HR,0.67;95%CI,0.52-0.86;P=.002)和严重低血糖事件(HR,0.14;95%CI,0.09-0.20;P<.001)的风险降低相关。CKD 是全因死亡率的显著效应修饰因素(P=.002),但不是心血管事件或严重低血糖事件的效应修饰因素。
与二甲双胍相比,磺酰脲类药物单药治疗与全因死亡率、严重低血糖事件和心血管事件风险增加相关。尽管 CKD 的存在减弱了死亡率获益,但对于 CKD 患者,二甲双胍可能是磺酰脲类药物的更安全替代药物。