Suppr超能文献

磺酰脲类药物作为 2 型糖尿病的二线药物与心血管和低血糖事件风险:基于人群的队列研究。

Sulfonylureas as second line drugs in type 2 diabetes and the risk of cardiovascular and hypoglycaemic events: population based cohort study.

机构信息

Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, 3755 Cote Ste-Catherine, H-461 Montréal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada.

Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ. 2018 Jul 18;362:k2693. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2693.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether adding or switching to sulfonylureas is associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, cardiovascular death, all cause mortality, and severe hypoglycaemia, compared with remaining on metformin monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes.

DESIGN

Population based cohort study.

SETTING

General practices contributing data to the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with type 2 diabetes initiating metformin monotherapy between 1998 and 2013.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Using the prevalent new-user cohort design we matched 1:1 patients adding or switching to sulfonylureas with those remaining on metformin monotherapy on high-dimensional propensity score, haemoglobin A1c, and number of previous metformin prescriptions. The two groups were compared using Cox proportional hazards models to estimate adjusted hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the study outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 77 138 metformin initiators, 25 699 added or switched to sulfonylureas during the study period. During a mean follow-up of 1.1 years, sulfonylureas were associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction (incidence rate 7.8 6.2 per 1000 person years, hazard ratio 1.26, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 1.56), all cause mortality (27.3 21.5, 1.28, 1.15 to 1.44), and severe hypoglycaemia (5.5 0.7, 7.60, 4.64 to 12.44) compared with continuing metformin monotherapy. There was a trend towards increased risks of ischaemic stroke (6.7 5.5, 1.24, 0.99 to 1.56) and cardiovascular death (9.4 8.1, 1.18, 0.98 to 1.43). Compared with adding sulfonylureas, switching to sulfonylureas was associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction (hazard ratio 1.51, 95% confidence interval, 1.03 to 2.24) and all-cause mortality (1.23, 1.00 to 1.50). No differences were observed for ischaemic stroke, cardiovascular death, or severe hypoglycaemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Sulfonylureas as second line drugs are associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction, all cause mortality, and severe hypoglycaemia, compared with remaining on metformin monotherapy. Continuing metformin when introducing sulfonylureas appears to be safer than switching.

摘要

目的

评估在 2 型糖尿病患者中,与继续使用二甲双胍单药治疗相比,加用或改用磺酰脲类药物是否会增加心肌梗死、缺血性卒中、心血管死亡、全因死亡率和严重低血糖的风险。

设计

基于人群的队列研究。

设置

向英国临床实践研究数据链提供数据的普通诊所。

参与者

1998 年至 2013 年间开始使用二甲双胍单药治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者。

主要观察指标

采用现患新用户队列设计,我们根据高维倾向评分、糖化血红蛋白和以前使用二甲双胍的处方数量,将加用或改用磺酰脲类药物的患者与继续使用二甲双胍单药治疗的患者进行 1:1 匹配。使用 Cox 比例风险模型比较两组患者,以估计研究结局的调整后危险比和 95%置信区间。

结果

在 77138 名二甲双胍初治患者中,25699 名患者在研究期间加用或改用磺酰脲类药物。在平均 1.1 年的随访中,磺酰脲类药物与心肌梗死风险增加相关(发生率为 7.8/1000 人年,危险比 1.26,95%置信区间为 1.01 至 1.56)、全因死亡率(27.3/21.5,1.28,1.15 至 1.44)和严重低血糖(5.5/0.7,7.60,4.64 至 12.44),与继续使用二甲双胍单药治疗相比。缺血性卒中和心血管死亡的风险呈上升趋势(6.7/5.5,1.24,0.99 至 1.56)和 (9.4/8.1,1.18,0.98 至 1.43)。与加用磺酰脲类药物相比,改用磺酰脲类药物与心肌梗死(危险比 1.51,95%置信区间为 1.03 至 2.24)和全因死亡率(1.23,1.00 至 1.50)风险增加相关。在缺血性卒中和心血管死亡或严重低血糖方面未观察到差异。

结论

与继续使用二甲双胍单药治疗相比,磺酰脲类药物作为二线药物与心肌梗死、全因死亡率和严重低血糖风险增加相关。在引入磺酰脲类药物时继续使用二甲双胍似乎比换药更安全。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66c6/6050517/8c84e5d6d9a9/suis042934.f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验