Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison.
Health Services and Care Research Program, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison.
JAMA Neurol. 2020 Apr 1;77(4):451-460. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.4501.
Identifying risk factors for brain atrophy during the aging process can help direct new preventive approaches for dementia and cognitive decline. The association of neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage with brain volume in this context is not well known.
To test whether neighborhood-level socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with decreased brain volume in a cognitively unimpaired population enriched for Alzheimer disease risk.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This study, conducted from January 6, 2010, to January 17, 2019, at an academic research neuroimaging center, used cross-sectional data on 951 participants from 2 large, ongoing cohort studies of Alzheimer disease (Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's Prevention and Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center clinical cohort). Participants were cognitively unimpaired based on National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroup diagnostic criteria for mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease, confirmed through a consensus diagnosis panel. The cohort was enriched for Alzheimer disease risk based on family history of dementia. Statistical analysis was performed from April 3 to September 27, 2019.
The Area Deprivation Index, a geospatially determined index of neighborhood-level disadvantage, and cardiovascular disease risk indices were calculated for each participant. Linear regression models were fitted to test associations between relative neighborhood-level disadvantage (highest 20% based on state of residence) and hippocampal and total brain tissue volume, as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging.
In the primary analysis of 951 participants (637 women [67.0%]; mean [SD] age, 63.9 [8.1] years), living in the 20% most disadvantaged neighborhoods was associated with 4.1% lower hippocampal volume (β = -317.44; 95% CI, -543.32 to -91.56; P = .006) and 2.0% lower total brain tissue volume (β = -20 959.67; 95% CI, -37 611.92 to -4307.43; P = .01), after controlling for intracranial volume, individual-level educational attainment, age, and sex. Robust propensity score-matched analyses determined that this association was not due to racial/ethnic or demographic characteristics. Cardiovascular risk score, examined in a subsample of 893 participants, mediated this association for total brain tissue but not for hippocampal volume.
For cognitively unimpaired individuals, living in the most disadvantaged neighborhoods was associated with significantly lower cerebral volumes, after controlling for maximal premorbid (total intracranial) volume. This finding suggests an association of community socioeconomic context, distinct from individual-level socioeconomic status, with brain volume during aging. Cardiovascular risk mediated this association for total brain tissue volume but not for hippocampal volume, suggesting that neighborhood-level disadvantage may be associated with these 2 outcomes via distinct biological pathways.
识别衰老过程中脑萎缩的风险因素有助于为痴呆和认知能力下降提供新的预防方法。在这种情况下,邻里社会经济劣势与大脑体积之间的关联尚不清楚。
在认知未受损的阿尔茨海默病风险人群中,测试邻里水平的社会经济劣势是否与脑体积减少有关。
设计、地点和参与者:这项研究于 2010 年 1 月 6 日至 2019 年 1 月 17 日在一个学术研究神经影像学中心进行,使用了来自 2 个大型正在进行的阿尔茨海默病队列研究(威斯康星州阿尔茨海默病预防注册处和威斯康星州阿尔茨海默病研究中心临床队列)的 951 名参与者的横断面数据。参与者根据国家老龄化协会-阿尔茨海默病协会工作组对轻度认知障碍和阿尔茨海默病的诊断标准被认定为认知未受损,并通过共识诊断小组得到证实。该队列基于痴呆家族史,对阿尔茨海默病风险进行了富集。统计分析于 2019 年 4 月 3 日至 9 月 27 日进行。
为每个参与者计算了邻里剥夺指数(一种基于地理位置的邻里水平劣势的指数)和心血管疾病风险指数。线性回归模型用于测试相对邻里水平劣势(基于居住州的前 20%)与海马体和总脑组织体积之间的关联,海马体和总脑组织体积通过磁共振成像进行评估。
在对 951 名参与者(637 名女性[67.0%];平均[标准差]年龄为 63.9[8.1]岁)的主要分析中,居住在 20%最劣势的邻里与海马体体积降低 4.1%(β=-317.44;95%CI,-543.32 至-91.56;P=0.006)和总脑组织体积降低 2.0%(β=-20959.67;95%CI,-37951.92 至-4307.43;P=0.01)有关,在控制了颅内体积、个体教育程度、年龄和性别后。稳健的倾向评分匹配分析确定,这种关联不是由于种族/民族或人口特征造成的。在 893 名参与者的亚组中检查的心血管风险评分中介了这种关联,但与海马体体积无关。
对于认知未受损的个体,在控制最大预患病(总颅内)体积后,居住在最劣势的邻里与大脑体积显著降低有关。这一发现表明,社区社会经济背景与衰老过程中的大脑体积有关,与个体社会经济地位不同。心血管风险对总脑组织体积的这种关联起中介作用,但对海马体体积没有作用,这表明邻里水平的劣势可能通过不同的生物学途径与这两个结果相关。