OU Oncological Surgery, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Methodologies, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 2;17(1):323. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010323.
Several studies have demonstrated that training with a laparoscopic simulator improves laparoscopic technical skills. We describe how to build a homemade, low-cost laparoscopic training simulator (LABOT) and its validation as a training instrument. First, sixty surgeons filled out a survey characterized by 12 closed-answer questions about realism, ergonomics, and usefulness for surgical training (global scores ranged from 1-very insufficient to 5-very good). The results of the questionnaires showed a mean (±SD) rating score of 4.18 ± 0.65 for all users. Then, 15 students (group S) and 15 residents (group R) completed 3 different tasks (T1, T2, T3), which were repeated twice to evaluate the execution time and the number of users' procedural errors. For T1, the R group had a lower mean execution time and a lower rate of procedural errors than the S group; for T2, the R and S groups had a similar mean execution time, but the R group had a lower rate of errors; and for T3, the R and S groups had a similar mean execution time and rate of errors. On a second attempt, all the participants tended to improve their results in doing these surgical tasks; nevertheless, after subgroup analysis of the T1 results, the S group had a better improvement of both parameters. Our laparoscopic simulator is simple to build, low-cost, easy to use, and seems to be a suitable resource for improving laparoscopic skills. In the future, further studies should evaluate the potential of this laparoscopic box on long-term surgical training with more complex tasks and simulation attempts.
多项研究表明,腹腔镜模拟器训练可提高腹腔镜技术技能。我们描述了如何构建自制的、低成本的腹腔镜训练模拟器(LABOT)及其作为训练工具的验证方法。首先,六十名外科医生填写了一份调查问卷,该问卷由 12 个封闭式问题组成,涉及真实性、人体工程学和对手术训练的有用性(总评分范围为 1-非常不足到 5-非常好)。问卷调查结果显示,所有用户的平均(±SD)评分均为 4.18 ± 0.65。然后,15 名学生(S 组)和 15 名住院医师(R 组)完成了 3 项不同的任务(T1、T2、T3),这些任务重复了两次,以评估执行时间和用户程序错误的数量。对于 T1,R 组的平均执行时间和程序错误率均低于 S 组;对于 T2,R 组和 S 组的平均执行时间相似,但 R 组的错误率较低;对于 T3,R 组和 S 组的平均执行时间和错误率相似。在第二次尝试中,所有参与者都倾向于提高完成这些手术任务的成绩;然而,在对 T1 结果进行亚组分析后,S 组在这两个参数方面都有更好的改善。我们的腹腔镜模拟器易于构建、成本低、易于使用,似乎是提高腹腔镜技能的合适资源。未来,应进一步研究该腹腔镜箱在具有更复杂任务和模拟尝试的长期手术训练中的潜力。