From Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (SB, KDV, MJB); Center for Survey Research, University of Massachusetts, Boston, (FJF).
J Am Board Fam Med. 2020 Jan-Feb;33(1):80-90. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.01.190120.
Despite recommendations to screen adults for depression in primary care, little is known about how people across education levels decide to treat their depression and factors that influence their decision.
We conducted a secondary analysis of a national, probability-based web survey in English-speaking adults aged 40 or older living in the United States who reported they discussed starting or continuing an antidepressant with their clinician in the past 2 years. Respondents answered questions about knowledge, decision-making process, and demographics. Education level was analyzed using 5 ordered categories. The Shared Decision Making (SDM) Process score was used to assess patient involvement. Descriptive statistics, χ tests, analysis of variance, and regression models were used to describe the data and test associations.
Of the 5682 people invited, 3396 answered questions about health decisions (59.8% response rate) and 385 reported discussing antidepressants. The mean percentage of knowledge questions answered correctly increased as education level increased ( = .008). The mean SDM Process score also increased with education ( = .001). There was an association between education and who made the treatment decision, suggesting that for respondents with less education, the clinician was more likely to decide ( = .001). Respondents with less education were less likely to report they would definitely make the same decision again ( = .000).
Those with less education were even less informed, had lower SDM Process scores and were less likely to think they made the right decision about antidepressants. There is a need to ensure patients are better informed about and involved in treatment for depression.
尽管有建议在初级保健中筛查成年人的抑郁症,但对于不同教育水平的人如何决定治疗他们的抑郁症以及影响他们决策的因素知之甚少。
我们对一项基于全国性的、以英语为母语的成年人的概率性网络调查进行了二次分析,这些成年人年龄在 40 岁或以上,他们报告在过去 2 年内曾与他们的临床医生讨论过开始或继续使用抗抑郁药。受访者回答了关于知识、决策过程和人口统计学的问题。教育水平使用 5 个有序类别进行分析。使用共享决策(SDM)过程评分来评估患者的参与度。描述性统计、卡方检验、方差分析和回归模型用于描述数据和检验关联。
在邀请的 5682 人中,有 3396 人回答了关于健康决策的问题(回应率为 59.8%),其中 385 人报告了讨论抗抑郁药的情况。正确回答知识问题的平均百分比随着教育水平的提高而增加( =.008)。SDM 过程评分的平均值也随着教育水平的提高而增加( =.001)。教育水平与谁做出治疗决策之间存在关联,这表明对于受教育程度较低的受访者,临床医生更有可能做出决策( =.001)。受教育程度较低的受访者不太可能报告他们肯定会再次做出相同的决定( =.000)。
受教育程度较低的人甚至获得的信息更少,SDM 过程评分更低,并且更不可能认为他们对抗抑郁药的治疗做出了正确的决策。需要确保患者更好地了解并参与抑郁症的治疗。