Stadler Stefan, Mergenthaler Nicoletta, Lange Tobias J
Department of Internal Medicine II, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Pulm Circ. 2019 Dec 27;9(4):2045894019894531. doi: 10.1177/2045894019894531. eCollection 2019 Oct-Dec.
Cardiac output is a prognostic marker in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Pulmonary blood flow as a surrogate for cardiac output can be measured non-invasively by inert gas rebreathing. We hypothesized that pulmonary blood flow can predict outcome in patients with pulmonary hypertension.
From January 2009 to January 2012, we measured pulmonary blood flow by inert gas rebreathing in outpatients with pulmonary hypertension. Patients with pulmonary hypertension confirmed by right heart catheterization and a valid inert gas rebreathing maneuver were followed until January 2016. The investigated outcome was all-cause mortality.
We included 259 patients (mean age 65 ± 13 years, 53% female) with pulmonary hypertension and classified into groups 1 (n = 103), 2 (n = 26), 3 (n = 80), and 4 (n = 50) according to the current pulmonary hypertension classification system. The median time between pulmonary hypertension diagnosis and inert gas rebreathing was 9 (IQR 0; 36) months. During a median follow-up time of 51 (IQR 20; 68) months, 109 patients (42%) died. Parameters significantly associated with survival (in order of decreasing statistical strength) were diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO), 6-minute walk distance (6-MWD), age, NTpro-BNP, WHO functional class, group 3 pulmonary hypertension, and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), while baseline hemodynamics and pulmonary blood flow were not. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, DLCO, age, 6-MWD, and TAPSE remained significant and independent predictors of the outcome. DLCO as the strongest parameter also significantly predicted survival in aetiological subgroups except for group 4.
DLCO is a strong and independent predictor for survival in patients with pulmonary hypertension of different aetiologies, while pulmonary blood flow measured by inert gas rebreathing is not.
心输出量是肺动脉高压患者的一个预后标志物。作为心输出量替代指标的肺血流量可通过惰性气体再呼吸法进行无创测量。我们推测肺血流量可预测肺动脉高压患者的预后。
2009年1月至2012年1月,我们对肺动脉高压门诊患者采用惰性气体再呼吸法测量肺血流量。经右心导管检查确诊为肺动脉高压且惰性气体再呼吸操作有效的患者随访至2016年1月。研究的结局指标是全因死亡率。
我们纳入了259例肺动脉高压患者(平均年龄65±13岁,53%为女性),并根据当前的肺动脉高压分类系统将其分为1组(n = 103)、2组(n = 26)、3组(n = 80)和4组(n = 50)。肺动脉高压诊断与惰性气体再呼吸之间的中位时间为9(四分位间距0;36)个月。在中位随访时间51(四分位间距20;68)个月期间,109例患者(42%)死亡。与生存显著相关的参数(按统计强度递减顺序)依次为肺一氧化碳弥散量(DLCO)、6分钟步行距离(6-MWD)、年龄、N末端脑钠肽前体(NTpro-BNP)、世界卫生组织功能分级、3组肺动脉高压以及三尖瓣环平面收缩期位移(TAPSE),而基线血流动力学和肺血流量则不然。在多变量Cox回归分析中,DLCO、年龄、6-MWD和TAPSE仍然是结局的显著且独立预测因素。DLCO作为最强参数,在除4组外的病因亚组中也显著预测了生存情况。
DLCO是不同病因肺动脉高压患者生存的强有力且独立的预测因素,而通过惰性气体再呼吸测量的肺血流量则不是。