Porr Caroline, Gaudine Alice, Woo Kevin, Smith-Young Joanne, Green Candace
Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2019 Dec 30;6:2333393619894958. doi: 10.1177/2333393619894958. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
Research is limited on how nurses in community settings manage ethical conflicts. To address this gap, we conducted a study to uncover the process of behaviors enacted by community nurses when experiencing ethical conflicts. Guided by Glaserian grounded theory, we developed a theoretical model (Moral Compassing) that enables us to explain the process how 24 community nurses managed challenging ethical situations. We discovered that the main concern with which nurses wrestle is moral uncertainty ("Should I be addressing what I think is a moral problem?"). Moral Compassing comprises processes that resolve this main concern by providing community nurses with the means to attain the moral agency necessary to decide to act or to decide not to act. The processes are , and . We also discovered that community nurses may experience continuing distress that we labeled .
关于社区环境中的护士如何处理伦理冲突的研究有限。为了填补这一空白,我们开展了一项研究,以揭示社区护士在经历伦理冲突时所采取行为的过程。在格拉斯理论的指导下,我们开发了一个理论模型(道德指引),使我们能够解释24名社区护士如何处理具有挑战性的伦理情况的过程。我们发现,护士们面临的主要问题是道德不确定性(“我是否应该处理我认为是道德问题的事情?”)。道德指引包括一些过程,通过为社区护士提供获得决定行动或不行动所需道德能动性的手段来解决这一主要问题。这些过程是 ,以及 。我们还发现,社区护士可能会经历持续的痛苦,我们将其称为 。