Suppr超能文献

社区卫生服务中的伦理反思小组:一项评估研究。

Ethics reflection groups in community health services: an evaluation study.

作者信息

Lillemoen Lillian, Pedersen Reidar

机构信息

University of Oslo, P.O.Box 1130, Blindern, NO-0318, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Apr 17;16:25. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0017-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Systematic ethics support in community health services in Norway is in the initial phase. There are few evaluation studies about the significance of ethics reflection on care. The aim of this study was to evaluate systematic ethics reflection in groups in community health (including nursing homes and residency), - from the perspectives of employees participating in the groups, the group facilitators and the service managers. The reflection groups were implemented as part of a research and development project.

METHODS

A mixed-methods design with qualitative focus group interviews, observations and written reports were used to evaluate. The study was conducted at two nursing homes, two home care districts and a residence for people with learning disabilities. Participants were employees, facilitators and service managers. The study was guided by ethical standard principles and was approved by the Norwegian Social Science Data Services.

RESULTS

We found support for ethics reflection as a valuable measure to strengthen clinical practice. New and improved solutions, more cooperation between employees, and improved collaboration with patients and their families are some of the results. No negative experiences were found. Instead, the ethics reflection based on experiences and challenges in the workplace, was described as a win-win situation. The evaluation also revealed what is needed to succeed and useful tips for further development of ethics support in community health services.

CONCLUSIONS

Ethics reflection groups focusing on ethical challenges from the participants' daily work were found to be significant for improved practice, collegial support and cooperation, personal and professional development among staff, facilitators and managers. Resources needed to succeed were managerial support, and anchoring ethics sessions in the routine of daily work.

摘要

背景

挪威社区卫生服务中的系统伦理支持尚处于初始阶段。关于伦理反思对护理重要性的评估研究很少。本研究的目的是从参与小组的员工、小组促进者和服务管理者的角度,评估社区卫生(包括养老院和住所)中各小组的系统伦理反思。反思小组是作为一个研发项目的一部分实施的。

方法

采用混合方法设计,通过定性焦点小组访谈、观察和书面报告进行评估。研究在两家养老院、两个家庭护理区和一个学习障碍者住所进行。参与者为员工、促进者和服务管理者。该研究遵循伦理标准原则,并获得了挪威社会科学数据服务中心的批准。

结果

我们发现伦理反思是加强临床实践的一项有价值的措施。新的和改进的解决方案、员工之间更多的合作以及与患者及其家属更好的协作等都是一些成果。未发现负面经历。相反,基于工作场所的经验和挑战进行的伦理反思被描述为一种双赢局面。评估还揭示了取得成功所需的条件以及社区卫生服务中伦理支持进一步发展的有用建议。

结论

关注参与者日常工作中的伦理挑战的伦理反思小组,对于改善实践、同事间的支持与合作、员工、促进者和管理者的个人及职业发展具有重要意义。取得成功所需的资源包括管理支持,以及将伦理会议融入日常工作流程。

相似文献

7
Ethics support in community care makes a difference for practice.社区关怀中的伦理支持对实践有影响。
Nurs Ethics. 2018 Mar;25(2):165-173. doi: 10.1177/0969733016667774. Epub 2016 Sep 22.

引用本文的文献

10
Clinical Ethics Committee in an Oncological Research Hospital: two-years Report.肿瘤研究所临床伦理委员会:两年报告
Nurs Ethics. 2023 Nov-Dec;30(7-8):1217-1231. doi: 10.1177/09697330231174529. Epub 2023 Jun 16.

本文引用的文献

2
Ethics support in institutional elderly care: a review of the literature.机构养老中的伦理支持:文献综述
J Med Ethics. 2014 Sep;40(9):625-31. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-101295. Epub 2014 Feb 27.
9

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验