• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证一种用于异物吸入的计算机评分系统:一项观察性研究。

Validation of a computerized scoring system for foreign body aspiration: An observational study.

机构信息

Pulmonary Institute, Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, Petah Tikva, Israel.

Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Pediatr Pulmonol. 2020 Mar;55(3):690-696. doi: 10.1002/ppul.24632. Epub 2020 Jan 7.

DOI:10.1002/ppul.24632
PMID:31909897
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The diagnosis of foreign body aspiration (FBA) is challenging. In a previous study, we developed a computerized scoring system (CSS) to support decision-making. In the present study, we aimed to validate it on a further cohort.

STUDY DESIGN

In this observational study, 100 children referred to the emergency department of a tertiary pediatric hospital for suspected FBA and treated according to standard protocol, were assigned a probability score using the CSS, between 0 and 1 (0, very low probability; 1, very high). The diagnosis of FBA was based on bronchoscopy, and if discharged without bronchoscopy, determined via telephone questionnaire, 4 to 6 months after discharge, supplemented by clinical re-evaluation and bronchoscopy, if respiratory symptoms persisted.

RESULTS

Thirty-five out of 100 children (35%) underwent bronchoscopy with 12 of 35 (34%) positive for FBA. Sixty-five patients were discharged without bronchoscopy and completed a telephone questionnaire. Seven patients required clinical re-evaluation for persistent respiratory symptoms, in two out of them, additional bronchoscopies were performed and were negative. The CSS median probability score was 0.94 in patients with FBA, as compared to 0.73 in patients without FBA (P = .007). The CSS area under the receiver operating curve was 0.74. At a probability score threshold of 0.6, the sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 41%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The present validation study suggests a high sensitivity of the CSS for the identification of FBA in children. We suggest that it might aid decision-making with regard to the need for bronchoscopy in children presenting to the emergency room.

摘要

目的

异物吸入(FBA)的诊断具有挑战性。在之前的研究中,我们开发了一种计算机评分系统(CSS)以支持决策。本研究旨在进一步验证该系统。

研究设计

在这项观察性研究中,100 名因疑似 FBA 而被转诊到一家三级儿科医院急诊科的儿童,根据标准方案使用 CSS 分配概率评分,范围为 0 到 1(0,极低概率;1,极高概率)。FBA 的诊断基于支气管镜检查,如果未行支气管镜检查,则在出院后 4 至 6 个月通过电话问卷调查确定,并在持续存在呼吸道症状时通过临床复查和支气管镜检查补充。

结果

100 名儿童中有 35 名(35%)接受了支气管镜检查,其中 35 名中有 12 名(34%)为 FBA 阳性。65 名患者未行支气管镜检查并完成了电话问卷调查。7 名患者因持续呼吸道症状需要临床复查,其中 2 名患者进行了额外的支气管镜检查,结果均为阴性。有 FBA 的患儿 CSS 概率评分中位数为 0.94,无 FBA 的患儿为 0.73(P=0.007)。CSS 的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 0.74。在概率评分阈值为 0.6 时,敏感性和特异性分别为 100%和 41%。

结论

本验证研究表明,CSS 对儿童 FBA 的识别具有较高的敏感性。我们建议它可能有助于决策是否需要对急诊科就诊的儿童进行支气管镜检查。

相似文献

1
Validation of a computerized scoring system for foreign body aspiration: An observational study.验证一种用于异物吸入的计算机评分系统:一项观察性研究。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2020 Mar;55(3):690-696. doi: 10.1002/ppul.24632. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
2
Foreign body aspiration score (FOBAS)-a prospectively validated algorithm for the management and prediction of foreign body aspiration in children.异物吸入评分(FOBAS)-一种用于儿童异物吸入管理和预测的前瞻性验证算法。
Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Feb;183(2):815-825. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-05347-9. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
3
Evaluation of Foreign body aspiration score (FOBAS) in children- A retrospective cohort study.评价儿童吸入性异物评分(FOBAS):一项回顾性队列研究。
Eur J Pediatr. 2023 Sep;182(9):4205-4212. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-05095-w. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
4
Bronchoscopy for evaluation of foreign body aspiration in children.用于评估儿童异物吸入的支气管镜检查。
J Pediatr Surg. 2003 Aug;38(8):1170-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(03)00263-x.
5
Safely Decreasing Rigid Bronchoscopies for Foreign-Body Aspiration in Children: An Algorithm for the Emergency Department.安全减少儿童异物吸入的硬质支气管镜检查:急诊科的一种算法
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Jun;28(3):273-278. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1603523. Epub 2017 May 23.
6
A new scoring system and clinical algorithm for the management of suspected foreign body aspiration in children: a retrospective cohort study.一种用于儿童疑似异物吸入管理的新评分系统和临床算法:一项回顾性队列研究。
Ital J Pediatr. 2021 Sep 28;47(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s13052-021-01147-9.
7
Computerized scoring system for the diagnosis of foreign body aspiration in children.用于诊断儿童异物吸入的计算机评分系统。
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2008 Nov;117(11):839-43. doi: 10.1177/000348940811701108.
8
Foreign Body Aspiration in Children with Focus on the Role of Flexible Bronchoscopy: A 5 Year Experience.关注可弯曲支气管镜作用的儿童异物吸入:五年经验
Isr Med Assoc J. 2015 Oct;17(10):599-603.
9
The multivariate analysis of indications of rigid bronchoscopy in suspected foreign body aspiration.疑似异物吸入时硬质支气管镜检查指征的多因素分析。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Sep;100:232-237. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.07.012. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
10
New scoring system to predict foreign body aspiration in children.用于预测儿童异物吸入的新评分系统。
J Pediatr Surg. 2020 Aug;55(8):1663-1666. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.12.015. Epub 2019 Dec 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Laryngeal Foreign Body Aspiration in Infancy: A Diagnostic Challenge.婴儿期喉异物吸入:一项诊断挑战。
Cureus. 2024 May 12;16(5):e60144. doi: 10.7759/cureus.60144. eCollection 2024 May.
2
Foreign body aspiration score (FOBAS)-a prospectively validated algorithm for the management and prediction of foreign body aspiration in children.异物吸入评分(FOBAS)-一种用于儿童异物吸入管理和预测的前瞻性验证算法。
Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Feb;183(2):815-825. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-05347-9. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
3
Evaluation of Foreign body aspiration score (FOBAS) in children- A retrospective cohort study.
评价儿童吸入性异物评分(FOBAS):一项回顾性队列研究。
Eur J Pediatr. 2023 Sep;182(9):4205-4212. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-05095-w. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
4
Using Machine Learning Technique to Predict the Most Reliable Diagnostic Finding for Foreign Body Aspiration in Children: Symptoms, Chest X-ray, or Auscultation?运用机器学习技术预测儿童异物吸入最可靠的诊断依据:症状、胸部X光还是听诊?
Cureus. 2022 Dec 13;14(12):e32461. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32461. eCollection 2022 Dec.
5
Diagnostic Errors in Initial Misdiagnosis of Foreign Body Aspiration in Children: A Retrospective Observational Study in a Tertiary Care Hospital in China.儿童异物吸入初始误诊中的诊断错误:中国一家三级医院的回顾性观察研究
Front Pediatr. 2021 Oct 15;9:694211. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.694211. eCollection 2021.
6
A new scoring system and clinical algorithm for the management of suspected foreign body aspiration in children: a retrospective cohort study.一种用于儿童疑似异物吸入管理的新评分系统和临床算法:一项回顾性队列研究。
Ital J Pediatr. 2021 Sep 28;47(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s13052-021-01147-9.