Department of Surgery, Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine, Auburn, AL, USA.
Med Educ Online. 2020 Dec;25(1):1714197. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2020.1714197.
: In this study we evaluated 40, top recommended, laparoscopic appendectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos located on public domain websites using eight criteria created by a panel of third year medical students and general surgeons. We hypothesized that there is a lack of quality, thorough educational laparoscopic surgical videos appropriate for third year medical students to review in preparation for the Surgery rotation.: Utilizing a panel, which included four third year medical students and two general surgeons, we created an 'ideal medical student educational video checklist.' This checklist included 8 vital criteria. We selected 40, top recommended, videos available on and search engines, using and ' as key terms. Each video was evaluated by four third year medical students individually, using a binary system 'meets' or 'does not meet' each criterion. Individual scores were averaged, producing a single score for each video.: 0/40 (0%) of the videos met all eight of the criteria. 26/40 (65%) of the videos did not meet half of the criteria. The top performing videos 7/40 (17%) only met 5/8 criteria. : We identified a lack of quality and thorough educational surgical videos appropriate for third year medical students and a need for improved online video based instruction. Our checklist can be utilized as a guide for anyone creating surgical videos for medical student education in the future.
在这项研究中，我们评估了 40 个位于公共领域网站上的顶级推荐的腹腔镜阑尾切除术和腹腔镜胆囊切除术视频，使用由三年级医学生和普通外科医生组成的专家组制定的八项标准。我们假设缺乏适合三年级医学生复习以准备外科轮转的高质量、全面的腹腔镜外科技能教学视频。
我们利用一个小组，其中包括四名三年级医学生和两名普通外科医生，创建了一个“理想的医学生教育视频清单”。该清单包括 8 个重要标准。我们使用“和”作为关键词，在 和 搜索引擎上选择了 40 个顶级推荐的视频。每个视频都由四名三年级医学生单独使用二进制系统“符合”或“不符合”每个标准进行评估。个人得分进行平均，为每个视频产生一个单一的分数。
0/40（0%）的视频符合所有八项标准。26/40（65%）的视频不符合一半的标准。表现最好的视频 7/40（17%）仅符合 5/8 个标准。
我们发现缺乏适合三年级医学生的高质量和全面的外科技能教学视频，需要改进在线视频教学。我们的清单可以作为未来任何人为医学生教育制作外科技能教学视频的指南。
