Schütz Nikola, Roth Dominik, Schwameis Michael, Röggla Martin, Domanovits Hans
Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna A-1090, Austria.
Open Access Emerg Med. 2019 Dec 23;11:305-312. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S228420. eCollection 2019.
Blood gas analysis plays an important role in both diagnosis and subsequent treatment of critically ill patients in the emergency department and the ICU. Historically, arterial blood is predominantly used for blood gas analysis. The puncture is painful and complications may occur. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the agreement between arterial and venous blood gas analysis and whether the sole use of venous blood gas analysis would have changed therapy.
Adult patients who were intubated in the field and received an arterial and venous blood gas analysis within 15 mins after admission to the ED were eligible for inclusion. The values for pH, pCO, HCO-, base excess and lactate levels were collected retrospectively. Mean differences were calculated by subtracting venous from arterial values. The agreement between venous and arterial measurements was assessed using the method of Bland and Altman. Blood gases were assessed by two independent physicians using a standardized questionnaire to determine whether the use of venous blood gases would have led to a different interpretation of the situation (other diagnostic path) or a change of therapy (eg. respirator adjustment). Acceptable limits were defined before the collection of data started.
Fifty patients (62% male, median age 63years) who were treated at the Emergency Department between June 1, 2014 and December 31, 2014 were included in the study. Following average differences and limits of agreement (LOA) were documented: pH 0.02312 with LOA from -0.048 to 0.094; pCO -3.612 mmHg with LOA from -15 to 8.1 mmHg; BE -0.154 mmol/l with LOA from -3.7 to 3.4 mmol/l; HCO-0.338 mmol/l with LOA from -2.27 to 2.9 mmol/l; Lactate -0.124 mg/dl with LOA from -2.28 to 2.03 mg/dl. Using venous blood gas results 100% of the patients with metabolic alkalosis were correctly diagnosed. Metabolic acidosis was detected with a high sensitivity (80.64%), specificity (89.47%) and positive predictive value (92.59%). The answers to lactate and acidosis due to AKI showed a specificity and positive predictive value of 100%. The respiratory adjustment showed a high sensitivity (91.89%) but a low specificity (38.46%).
For pH, bicarbonate, BE and lactate venous blood gases can be used as surrogates for arterial measurements. Venous pCO can be used for screening of hypercapnia and trending. Respirator adjustments may be done too often if the venous blood gas is used.
血气分析在急诊科和重症监护病房(ICU)危重症患者的诊断及后续治疗中都起着重要作用。从历史上看,动脉血主要用于血气分析。动脉穿刺很疼,且可能会出现并发症。本研究的目的是评估动脉血气分析和静脉血气分析之间的一致性,以及仅使用静脉血气分析是否会改变治疗方案。
纳入在现场插管并在急诊部(ED)入院后15分钟内接受动脉和静脉血气分析的成年患者。回顾性收集pH、pCO₂、HCO₃⁻、碱剩余和乳酸水平的值。通过从动脉值中减去静脉值来计算平均差异。使用Bland和Altman方法评估静脉和动脉测量之间的一致性。由两名独立的医生使用标准化问卷评估血气,以确定使用静脉血气是否会导致对病情的不同解读(其他诊断途径)或治疗方案的改变(例如呼吸机调整)。在开始收集数据之前定义可接受的限度。
纳入了2014年6月1日至2014年12月31日期间在急诊科接受治疗的50例患者(男性占62%,中位年龄63岁)。记录了以下平均差异和一致性界限(LOA):pH为0.02312,LOA为-0.048至0.094;pCO₂为-3.612 mmHg,LOA为-15至8.1 mmHg;碱剩余为-0.154 mmol/L,LOA为-3.7至3.4 mmol/L;HCO₃⁻为0.338 mmol/L,LOA为-2.27至2.9 mmol/L;乳酸为-0.124 mg/dl,LOA为-2.28至2.03 mg/dl。使用静脉血气结果,100%的代谢性碱中毒患者被正确诊断。代谢性酸中毒的检测具有高敏感性(80.64%)、特异性(89.47%)和阳性预测值(92.59%)。急性肾损伤导致的乳酸和酸中毒的答案显示特异性和阳性预测值为100%。呼吸调整显示出高敏感性(91.89%)但特异性低(38.46%)。
对于pH、碳酸氢盐、碱剩余和乳酸,静脉血气可作为动脉测量的替代指标。静脉pCO₂可用于高碳酸血症的筛查和趋势监测。如果使用静脉血气,呼吸机调整可能会过于频繁。