Santos Marta Silva, Behm David G, Barbado David, DeSantana Josimari Melo, Da Silva-Grigoletto Marzo Edir
Physical Education Department, Functional Training Group, Graduate Program in Physiological Sciences, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão, Brazil.
School of Human Kinetics and Recreation, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NF, Canada.
Front Physiol. 2019 Dec 18;10:1490. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01490. eCollection 2019.
Research regarding the relationship between core muscle endurance and performance is limited. The purpose of this study was to analyze the association between core/trunk endurance and athletic performance. Seventy-four healthy participants between 18 and 45 years old participated in this study (Age: 26.0 ± 6.5 years; Mass: 74.6 ± 12.8 kg; Height: 1.74 ± 0.08 m; BMI: 19.0 ± 6.8 kg/m). The core endurance was measured using the McGill protocol, consisting of the following tests: trunk flexion, back extension, and side-bridge. Functional performance was evaluated with push-ups, sit to stand, T-run test, countermovement jump (CMJ), Yo-Yo test, maximum dynamic strength-one repetition maximum (1RM) and muscle power on the bench press, pull row, and leg press. The regression results between the McGill protocol (proxy for core/trunk endurance) and the dependent variables were: 1RM pull row: = 0.109 with = 0.046; RM bench press: = 0.149 with = 0.012; RM leg press: = 0.144 with = 0.013 and power pull row: = 0.151 with = 0.016; power bench press: = 0.136 with = 0.026; power leg press: = 0.122 with = 0.013), push-ups: = 0.157 with < 0.001, sit to stand: = 0.198 with < 0,001), functional movement score: = 0.209 with < 0.001). Nevertheless, core endurance scores were not able to predict jump ability ( = 0.014, = 0.807) or agility (-test: 0.036 with = 0.497). In conclusion, core endurance exerted no significant influence the agility and jump performance but influenced the ability to run intermittently, exert maximum power and strength in different actions (push, pull, and lift exercises) related to the better quality of movement (FMS).
关于核心肌肉耐力与运动表现之间关系的研究有限。本研究的目的是分析核心/躯干耐力与运动表现之间的关联。74名年龄在18至45岁之间的健康参与者参与了本研究(年龄:26.0±6.5岁;体重:74.6±12.8千克;身高:1.74±0.08米;体重指数:19.0±6.8千克/平方米)。使用麦吉尔方案测量核心耐力,该方案包括以下测试:躯干前屈、后伸和侧桥。通过俯卧撑、坐立试验、T跑测试、反向纵跳(CMJ)、Yo-Yo测试、最大动态力量-一次重复最大值(1RM)以及卧推、引体向上和腿举时的肌肉力量来评估功能表现。麦麦吉尔方案(代表核心/躯干耐力)与因变量之间的回归结果为:引体向上1RM:β = 0.109,p = 0.046;卧推1RM:β = 0.149,p = 0.012;腿举1RM:β = 0.144,p = 0.013;引体向上功率:β = 0.151,p = 0.016;卧推功率:β = 0.136,p = 0.026;腿举功率:β = 0.122,p = 0.013),俯卧撑:β = 0.157,p < 0.001,坐立试验:β = 0.198,p < 0.001),功能运动评分:β = 0.209,p < 0.001)。然而,核心耐力得分无法预测跳跃能力(β = 0.014,p = 0.807)或敏捷性(T跑测试:β = 0.036,p = 0.497)。总之,核心耐力对敏捷性和跳跃表现没有显著影响,但对间歇性跑步能力、在与更好的运动质量(FMS)相关的不同动作(推、拉和举练习)中发挥最大功率和力量的能力有影响。