Fogliata Arianna, Silvestri Fioretta, Marcelli Lorenzo, Gallotta Maria Chiara, Curzi Davide
Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 81100 Caserta, Italy.
Department of Human Sciences, Pegaso Telematic University, 80143 Naples, Italy.
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2025 Apr 25;10(2):144. doi: 10.3390/jfmk10020144.
: During growth, the reduction in motor control makes core stability training essential, especially in sports involving dynamic jumps. Given the limited training time of adolescent athletes, finding strategies to maximize the effects of core stability training is crucial. This study analyzed the effects of incorporating body-centering techniques (a method that involves conscious modulation of intra-abdominal pressure to enhance postural stability during motor gestures) into a core stability training protocol on balance, trunk control, and lower limb explosive strength in adolescent volleyball players. : Forty-four female volleyball athletes (15.6 ± 1.4 years of age) were randomly divided into three experimental groups: G1 = body-centering + core stability training; G2 = core stability training; and G3 = standard conditioning session. The athletes performed 30 min of differentiated intervention training twice a week for 8 weeks. Balance ability (Berg Balance Scale-BBS and Stork balance stand test-SBST), trunk control (Trunk Control test-TCT), and lower limb explosive strength (broad jump-BJ, squat jump-SJ, and drop jump-DJ) were assessed at the beginning (T0) and the end (T1) of the intervention period, and 12 weeks later (T2). : Data showed a significant improvement of BBS, SBST, DJ ( < 0.01), and TCT ( < 0.05) in G1 and G2 at T1 compared to T0, which persisted until T2 except for DJ in both groups. SJ improved only in G1 at T1 compared to T0 ( = 0.016). G1 showed a higher rate of improvement in SBST (T1: +18.2%; T2: +16.8%) and in DJ (T1: +3%) compared to G2 (SBST T1: +7.6%, T2: +5.2%; DJ: +2.5%). In addition, only G1 showed a significant improvement rate in BBS score (+2.2%) compared to G3 (+0.4%) at T1. : These results suggested that core training improves balance, trunk control, and explosive strength in young volleyball athletes with and without body-centering. However, integrating body-centering into core exercises leads to better balance and jumping power than core stability training alone.
在生长发育过程中,运动控制能力的下降使得核心稳定性训练至关重要,尤其是在涉及动态跳跃的运动项目中。鉴于青少年运动员的训练时间有限,找到能使核心稳定性训练效果最大化的策略至关重要。本研究分析了将身体中心化技术(一种通过有意识地调节腹内压来增强运动姿势中姿势稳定性的方法)纳入核心稳定性训练方案对青少年排球运动员平衡能力、躯干控制能力和下肢爆发力的影响。44名女性排球运动员(年龄15.6±1.4岁)被随机分为三个实验组:G1 = 身体中心化 + 核心稳定性训练;G2 = 核心稳定性训练;G3 = 标准体能训练课。运动员们每周进行两次30分钟的差异化干预训练,共持续8周。在干预期开始时(T0)、结束时(T1)以及12周后(T2)评估平衡能力(伯格平衡量表 - BBS和鹳式平衡站立测试 - SBST)、躯干控制能力(躯干控制测试 - TCT)和下肢爆发力(立定跳远 - BJ、深蹲跳 - SJ和下落跳 - DJ)。数据显示,与T0相比,G1组和G2组在T1时BBS、SBST、DJ(P < 0.01)和TCT(P < 0.05)有显著改善,除两组的DJ外,这种改善持续到T2。与T0相比,SJ仅在G1组的T1时有改善(P = 0.016)。与G2组(SBST T1:+7.6%,T2:+5.2%;DJ:+2.5%)相比,G1组在SBST(T1:+18.2%;T2:+16.8%)和DJ(T1:+3%)方面的改善率更高。此外,在T1时,与G3组(+0.4%)相比,只有G1组在BBS评分上有显著改善率(+2.2%)。这些结果表明,无论有无身体中心化技术,核心训练都能提高年轻排球运动员的平衡能力、躯干控制能力和爆发力。然而,将身体中心化技术融入核心训练比单独的核心稳定性训练能带来更好的平衡能力和跳跃能力。