• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

花蜜中的微生物丰度、组成和功能受花访客身份的影响。

Microbial abundance, composition, and function in nectar are shaped by flower visitor identity.

机构信息

Department of Biology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA.

Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.

出版信息

FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2020 Mar 1;96(3). doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiaa003.

DOI:10.1093/femsec/fiaa003
PMID:31922546
Abstract

Microbial dispersal is essential for establishment in new habitats, but the role of vector identity is poorly understood in community assembly and function. Here, we compared microbial assembly and function in floral nectar visited by legitimate pollinators (hummingbirds) and nectar robbers (carpenter bees). We assessed effects of visitation on the abundance and composition of culturable bacteria and fungi and their taxonomy and function using shotgun metagenomics and nectar chemistry. We also compared metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) of Acinetobacter, a common and highly abundant nectar bacterium, among visitor treatments. Visitation increased microbial abundance, but robbing resulted in 10× higher microbial abundance than pollination. Microbial communities differed among visitor treatments: robbed flowers were characterized by predominant nectar specialists within Acetobacteraceae and Metschnikowiaceae, with a concurrent loss of rare taxa, and these resulting communities harbored genes relating to osmotic stress, saccharide metabolism and specialized transporters. Gene differences were mirrored in function: robbed nectar contained a higher percentage of monosaccharides. Draft genomes of Acinetobacter revealed distinct amino acid and saccharide utilization pathways in strains isolated from robbed versus pollinated flowers. Our results suggest an unrecognized cost of nectar robbing for pollination and distinct effects of visitor type on interactions between plants and pollinators. Overall, these results suggest vector identity is an underappreciated factor structuring microbial community assembly and function.

摘要

微生物的扩散对于在新栖息地的建立至关重要,但在群落组装和功能方面,载体身份的作用还了解甚少。在这里,我们比较了由合法传粉者(蜂鸟)和花蜜掠夺者(木匠蜂)访问的花卉花蜜中的微生物组装和功能。我们使用鸟枪法宏基因组学和花蜜化学方法评估了访问对可培养细菌和真菌的丰度和组成及其分类和功能的影响。我们还比较了在访客处理中常见且高度丰富的花蜜细菌不动杆菌的宏基因组组装基因组(MAG)。访问增加了微生物的丰度,但掠夺导致的微生物丰度比授粉高 10 倍。微生物群落因访客处理而异:掠夺花朵的特征是在醋酸杆菌科和 Metschnikowiaceae 内占主导地位的花蜜专性细菌,同时稀有分类群的丧失,这些群落中存在与渗透胁迫、糖代谢和专门转运体相关的基因。功能上也存在差异:掠夺的花蜜中含有更高比例的单糖。从掠夺和授粉花朵中分离出的不动杆菌的草图基因组揭示了不同的氨基酸和糖利用途径。我们的研究结果表明,花蜜掠夺对授粉是一种未被认识到的代价,并且访客类型对植物和传粉者之间的相互作用有明显的影响。总的来说,这些结果表明,载体身份是一个被低估的因素,它影响着微生物群落组装和功能。

相似文献

1
Microbial abundance, composition, and function in nectar are shaped by flower visitor identity.花蜜中的微生物丰度、组成和功能受花访客身份的影响。
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2020 Mar 1;96(3). doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiaa003.
2
Spatio-temporal variation of nectar robbing in Salvia gesneriflora and its effects on nectar production and legitimate visitors.鼠尾草花蜜掠夺的时空变化及其对花蜜分泌和合法访花者的影响
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2016 Jan;18(1):9-14. doi: 10.1111/plb.12311. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
3
Nectar replenishment maintains the neutral effects of nectar robbing on female reproductive success of Salvia przewalskii (Lamiaceae), a plant pollinated and robbed by bumble bees.花蜜补充维持了花蜜盗窃对鼠尾草(唇形科)雌性繁殖成功率的中性影响,鼠尾草是一种由熊蜂传粉和盗窃花蜜的植物。
Ann Bot. 2017 Apr 1;119(6):1053-1059. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcw285.
4
Culturable bacteria are more common than fungi in floral nectar and are more easily dispersed by thrips, a ubiquitous flower visitor.花密中的可培养细菌比真菌更为常见,并且更容易被无处不在的访花昆虫蓟马传播。
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2021 Dec 1;97(12). doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiab150.
5
Nectar robbing in bellflower (Sesamum radiatum) benefited pollinators but unaffected maternal function of plant reproduction.风铃草(Sesamum radiatum)中的蜜掠夺行为有利于传粉者,但对植物繁殖的母体功能没有影响。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jun 7;9(1):8357. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44741-y.
6
Are nectar-robbers mutualists or antagonists?花蜜盗窃者是共生者还是拮抗者?
Oecologia. 2004 Apr;139(2):246-54. doi: 10.1007/s00442-004-1504-8. Epub 2004 Feb 7.
7
I've been robbed! - Can changes in floral traits discourage bee pollination?我被抢劫了!- 花部特征的变化能否阻止蜜蜂传粉?
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 21;14(11):e0225252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225252. eCollection 2019.
8
Nectar robbery by a hermit hummingbird: association to floral phenotype and its influence on flowers and network structure.一只隐蜂鸟的花蜜窃取行为:与花表型的关联及其对花朵和网络结构的影响
Oecologia. 2015 Jul;178(3):783-93. doi: 10.1007/s00442-015-3275-9. Epub 2015 Mar 6.
9
Pollination in Jacaranda rugosa (Bignoniaceae): euglossine pollinators, nectar robbers and low fruit set.皱叶蓝花楹(紫葳科)的传粉:兰花蜂传粉者、花蜜盗食者与低坐果率
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2009 Mar;11(2):131-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2008.00118.x.
10
Pollination syndromes ignored: importance of non-ornithophilous flowers to Neotropical savanna hummingbirds.被忽视的传粉综合征:非鸟媒花对新热带稀树草原蜂鸟的重要性
Naturwissenschaften. 2013 Nov;100(11):1061-8. doi: 10.1007/s00114-013-1111-9. Epub 2013 Nov 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Bacteria in Honeybee Crops Are Decoupled from Those in Floral Nectar and Bee Mouths.蜜蜂嗉囊中的细菌与花蜜和蜜蜂口腔中的细菌相互分离。
Microb Ecol. 2025 May 19;88(1):46. doi: 10.1007/s00248-025-02544-x.
2
Unraveling the Complexities of Flowering in Ornamental Plants: The Interplay of Genetics, Hormonal Networks, and Microbiome.解析观赏植物开花的复杂性:遗传学、激素网络与微生物群的相互作用
Plants (Basel). 2025 Apr 6;14(7):1131. doi: 10.3390/plants14071131.
3
Nectar peroxide: assessing variation among plant species, microbial tolerance, and effects on microbial community assembly.
花蜜过氧化物:评估植物物种间的差异、微生物耐受性以及对微生物群落组装的影响。
New Phytol. 2025 May;246(3):1361-1376. doi: 10.1111/nph.70050. Epub 2025 Mar 19.
4
Specialized metabolites present in nectar inhibit the growth of nectar-inhabiting microorganisms.花蜜中存在的特殊代谢产物会抑制栖息在花蜜中的微生物的生长。
Front Plant Sci. 2025 Mar 4;16:1557228. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1557228. eCollection 2025.
5
DNA in honey could describe the changes in flower visits and microbe encounters of honey bees over decades.蜂蜜中的DNA可以描述几十年来蜜蜂采花和接触微生物的变化。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 14;15(1):8807. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93315-8.
6
The Role of Phenotypic Plasticity and Within-Environment Trait Variability in the Assembly of the Nectar Microbiome and Plant-Microbe-Animal Interactions.表型可塑性和环境内性状变异性在花蜜微生物组组装及植物-微生物-动物相互作用中的作用
Ecol Evol. 2025 Mar 2;15(3):e71059. doi: 10.1002/ece3.71059. eCollection 2025 Mar.
7
Floral Resource Integration: Enhancing Biocontrol of Within Sustainable IPM Frameworks.花卉资源整合:在可持续综合虫害管理框架内加强生物防治
Plants (Basel). 2025 Jan 22;14(3):319. doi: 10.3390/plants14030319.
8
Direct and indirect effects of land use on microbiomes of trap-nesting solitary bee larvae and nests.土地利用对陷阱巢独居蜂幼虫和巢穴微生物群落的直接和间接影响。
Front Microbiol. 2025 Jan 9;15:1513096. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1513096. eCollection 2024.
9
Seasonal Assembly of Nectar Microbial Communities Across Angiosperm Plant Species: Assessing Contributions of Climate and Plant Traits.被子植物物种间花蜜微生物群落的季节性聚集:评估气候和植物性状的作用
Ecol Lett. 2025 Jan;28(1):e70045. doi: 10.1111/ele.70045.
10
Genome evolution following an ecological shift in nectar-dwelling .花蜜栖息生态转变后的基因组进化
mSphere. 2025 Jan 28;10(1):e0101024. doi: 10.1128/msphere.01010-24. Epub 2024 Dec 26.