• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

土地利用对陷阱巢独居蜂幼虫和巢穴微生物群落的直接和间接影响。

Direct and indirect effects of land use on microbiomes of trap-nesting solitary bee larvae and nests.

作者信息

Peters Birte, Leonhardt Sara Diana, Schloter Michael, Keller Alexander

机构信息

Department for Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.

Center for Computational and Theoretical Biology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.

出版信息

Front Microbiol. 2025 Jan 9;15:1513096. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1513096. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1513096
PMID:39845038
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11753253/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The global decline in biodiversity and insect populations highlights the urgent need to conserve ecosystem functions, such as plant pollination by solitary bees. Human activities, particularly agricultural intensification, pose significant threats to these essential services. Changes in land use alter resource and nest site availability, pesticide exposure and other factors impacting the richness, diversity, and health of solitary bee species. In this study, we investigated yet another facet currently less well investigated in such context: Microbial communities associated with wild bees play crucial roles in larval development, metabolism, immunity and overall bee health. However, the drivers and dynamics of healthy microbiome in solitary bees are still poorly understood, especially regarding the direct and indirect effects of land use on the diversity and composition of these microbial communities.

METHODS

We examined bacterial communities in the offspring and nest materials of the Megachilid trap-nesting solitary bee, Osmia bicornis, along a gradient of land use intensification by 16S rRNA gene metabarcoding. Given that landscape composition, climatic conditions, and food resources are known to influence microbial compositions in solitary bee species, we hypothesized that land use changes would alter resources available for food and nest material collection and thereby affecting the microbiomes in offspring and their nest environments. We anticipated reduced microbial diversity and altered composition with increased land use intensification, which is known to decrease the number and diversity of resources, including the pool of floral and soil bacteria in the surrounding environment.

RESULTS

As expected, we observed significant shifts in the bacterial composition and diversity of bees and their nests across varying degrees of land use intensity, differing in management types and the availability of flowers. The Shannon diversity of bacteria in nest materials (larval pollen provision, soil nest enclosure) and larval guts decreased with increasing land use intensity. However, the pupae microbiome remained unaffected, indicating a reorganization of the microbiome during metamorphosis, which is not significantly influenced by land use and available resources.

DISCUSSION

Our findings provide new insights into the factors shaping environmental transmission and changes in solitary bee microbiomes. This understanding is crucial for comprehending the impacts of intensive land use on wild bee health and developing strategies to mitigate these effects.

摘要

引言

全球生物多样性和昆虫数量的下降凸显了保护生态系统功能的迫切需求,比如独居蜂对植物的授粉作用。人类活动,尤其是农业集约化,对这些重要服务构成了重大威胁。土地利用的变化改变了资源和巢穴的可用性、农药暴露以及其他影响独居蜂物种丰富度、多样性和健康状况的因素。在本研究中,我们调查了在此背景下目前较少被深入研究的另一个方面:与野生蜜蜂相关的微生物群落对幼虫发育、新陈代谢、免疫和蜜蜂整体健康起着关键作用。然而,人们对独居蜂健康微生物群的驱动因素和动态变化仍知之甚少,特别是关于土地利用对这些微生物群落多样性和组成的直接和间接影响。

方法

我们通过16S rRNA基因代谢条形码技术,沿着土地利用集约化梯度,研究了切叶蜂科筑巢独居蜂角额壁蜂后代及其巢穴材料中的细菌群落。鉴于已知景观组成、气候条件和食物资源会影响独居蜂物种的微生物组成,我们假设土地利用变化会改变用于采集食物和巢穴材料的可用资源,从而影响后代及其巢穴环境中的微生物群。我们预计随着土地利用集约化程度的增加,微生物多样性会降低,组成会发生改变,因为土地利用集约化已知会减少资源的数量和多样性,包括周围环境中的花卉和土壤细菌库。

结果

正如预期的那样,我们观察到在不同程度的土地利用强度下,蜜蜂及其巢穴的细菌组成和多样性发生了显著变化,这些土地利用强度在管理类型和花卉可用性方面存在差异。巢穴材料(幼虫花粉供应、土壤巢穴外壳)和幼虫肠道中细菌的香农多样性随着土地利用强度的增加而降低。然而,蛹的微生物群未受影响,这表明在变态过程中微生物群发生了重组,且这种重组不受土地利用和可用资源的显著影响。

讨论

我们的研究结果为影响独居蜂微生物群环境传播和变化的因素提供了新的见解。这种理解对于理解集约土地利用对野生蜜蜂健康的影响以及制定减轻这些影响的策略至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf1f/11753253/e84470613659/fmicb-15-1513096-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf1f/11753253/dfa90bf2c7f7/fmicb-15-1513096-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf1f/11753253/529398dcd0c7/fmicb-15-1513096-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf1f/11753253/938a59f893d1/fmicb-15-1513096-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf1f/11753253/e84470613659/fmicb-15-1513096-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf1f/11753253/dfa90bf2c7f7/fmicb-15-1513096-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf1f/11753253/529398dcd0c7/fmicb-15-1513096-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf1f/11753253/938a59f893d1/fmicb-15-1513096-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf1f/11753253/e84470613659/fmicb-15-1513096-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Direct and indirect effects of land use on microbiomes of trap-nesting solitary bee larvae and nests.土地利用对陷阱巢独居蜂幼虫和巢穴微生物群落的直接和间接影响。
Front Microbiol. 2025 Jan 9;15:1513096. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1513096. eCollection 2024.
2
Diets maintained in a changing world: Does land-use intensification alter wild bee communities by selecting for flexible generalists?变化世界中的饮食:土地利用集约化是否通过选择灵活的泛化种来改变野生蜜蜂群落?
Ecol Evol. 2022 May 15;12(5):e8919. doi: 10.1002/ece3.8919. eCollection 2022 May.
3
Harvesting effects on wild bee communities in bioenergy grasslands depend on nesting guild.生物能源草地中对野生蜜蜂群落的收获效应取决于筑巢群体。
Ecol Appl. 2019 Mar;29(2):e01828. doi: 10.1002/eap.1828. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
4
Susceptibility of Red Mason Bee Larvae to Bacterial Threats Due to Microbiome Exchange with Imported Pollen Provisions.由于与进口花粉供应进行微生物群落交换,红壁蜂幼虫对细菌威胁的易感性。
Insects. 2020 Jun 15;11(6):373. doi: 10.3390/insects11060373.
5
Wild bee larval food composition in five European cities.五种欧洲城市野生蜜蜂幼虫的食物组成。
Ecology. 2022 Sep;103(9):e3740. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3740. Epub 2022 Jun 12.
6
Bacterial community structure and succession in nests of two megachilid bee genera.两种 Megachilid 蜜蜂属巢中的细菌群落结构和演替。
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2019 Jan 1;95(1). doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiy218.
7
Rangeland sharing by cattle and bees: moderate grazing does not impair bee communities and resource availability.牛和蜜蜂共享牧场:适度放牧不会损害蜜蜂群落和资源供应。
Ecol Appl. 2020 Apr;30(3):e02066. doi: 10.1002/eap.2066. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
8
Landscape heterogeneity correlates with bee and pollen diversity while size and specialization degree explain species-specific responses of wild bees to the environment.景观异质性与蜜蜂和花粉多样性相关,而大小和专业化程度则解释了野生蜜蜂对环境的种特异性响应。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Dec 1;954:176595. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176595. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
9
Environmentally acquired gut-associated bacteria are not critical for growth and survival in a solitary bee, .在独居蜜蜂中,从环境中获得的肠道相关细菌对于其生长和存活并不是至关重要的。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2024 Sep 18;90(9):e0207623. doi: 10.1128/aem.02076-23. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
10
Multi-scalar drivers of biodiversity: local management mediates wild bee community response to regional urbanization.生物多样性的多尺度驱动因素:当地管理调节野生蜜蜂群落对区域城市化的响应。
Ecol Appl. 2019 Apr;29(3):e01869. doi: 10.1002/eap.1869. Epub 2019 Mar 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Environmentally acquired gut-associated bacteria are not critical for growth and survival in a solitary bee, .在独居蜜蜂中,从环境中获得的肠道相关细菌对于其生长和存活并不是至关重要的。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2024 Sep 18;90(9):e0207623. doi: 10.1128/aem.02076-23. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
2
Symbiotic bacteria and fungi proliferate in diapause and may enhance overwintering survival in a solitary bee.共生细菌和真菌在滞育期内大量繁殖,可能增强独居蜂的越冬生存能力。
ISME J. 2024 Jan 8;18(1). doi: 10.1093/ismejo/wrae089.
3
Bumble bee microbiota shows temporal succession and increase of lactic acid bacteria when exposed to outdoor environments.
当大黄蜂暴露于户外环境时,其微生物组会表现出时间上的演替和乳酸菌数量的增加。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024 Mar 4;14:1342781. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1342781. eCollection 2024.
4
Microbes, the 'silent third partners' of bee-angiosperm mutualisms.微生物:蜜蜂与被子植物共生关系中的“沉默的第三方伙伴”。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2024 Jan;39(1):65-77. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2023.09.001. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
5
Environmental Effects on Bee Microbiota.环境对蜜蜂微生物组的影响。
Microb Ecol. 2023 Oct;86(3):1487-1498. doi: 10.1007/s00248-023-02226-6. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
6
The gut microbiome of solitary bees is mainly affected by pathogen assemblage and partially by land use.独居蜂的肠道微生物群主要受病原体组合的影响,部分受土地利用的影响。
Environ Microbiome. 2023 Apr 26;18(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s40793-023-00494-w.
7
Bee breweries: The unusually fermentative, lactobacilli-dominated brood cell microbiomes of cellophane bees.蜜蜂酿造厂:玻璃纸蜂异常发酵、以乳酸菌为主的育幼细胞微生物群落。
Front Microbiol. 2023 Apr 5;14:1114849. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1114849. eCollection 2023.
8
Solitary bee larvae modify bacterial diversity of pollen provisions in the stem-nesting bee, (Megachilidae).独居蜜蜂幼虫改变了茎巢蜂(切叶蜂科)花粉储备的细菌多样性。
Front Microbiol. 2023 Jan 9;13:1057626. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1057626. eCollection 2022.
9
Bacterial and Fungal Symbionts in Pollen Provisions of a Native Solitary Bee in Urban and Rural Environments.城市和农村环境中本地独居蜜蜂花粉中的细菌和真菌共生体。
Microb Ecol. 2023 Aug;86(2):1416-1427. doi: 10.1007/s00248-022-02164-9. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
10
The effects of urban land use gradients on wild bee microbiomes.城市土地利用梯度对野生蜜蜂微生物群落的影响。
Front Microbiol. 2022 Nov 17;13:992660. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.992660. eCollection 2022.