• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Association Between Environmental Factors and Toxigenic Clostridioides difficile Carriage at Hospital Admission.入院时环境因素与产毒艰难梭菌携带的相关性研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1919132. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19132.
2
Asymptomatic and yet C. difficile-toxin positive? Prevalence and risk factors of carriers of toxigenic Clostridium difficile among geriatric in-patients.无症状但艰难梭菌毒素呈阳性?老年住院患者中产毒艰难梭菌携带者的患病率及危险因素
BMC Geriatr. 2016 Nov 15;16(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0358-3.
3
Impact of Toxigenic Clostridium difficile Colonization on the Risk of Subsequent C. difficile Infection in Intensive Care Unit Patients.产毒艰难梭菌定植对重症监护病房患者后续艰难梭菌感染风险的影响
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2015 Nov;36(11):1324-9. doi: 10.1017/ice.2015.177. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
4
Colonization of toxigenic Clostridium difficile among ICU patients: a prospective study.重症监护病房患者中产毒艰难梭菌的定植:一项前瞻性研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Aug 9;16:397. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1729-2.
5
Prevalence and risk factors for asymptomatic Clostridium difficile carriage.无症状艰难梭菌携带的患病率及危险因素
Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Jul 15;59(2):216-22. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu258. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
6
Acquisition of Clostridium difficile Colonization and Infection After Transfer From a Veterans Affairs Hospital to an Affiliated Long-Term Care Facility.从退伍军人事务医院转入附属医院长期护理机构后艰难梭菌定植和感染的获得。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017 Sep;38(9):1070-1076. doi: 10.1017/ice.2017.140. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
7
Ribotype variability of Clostridioides difficile strains in patients with hospital-acquired C. difficile infections, community-acquired C. difficile infections, and colonization with toxigenic and non-toxigenic strains of C. difficile.艰难梭菌菌株在医院获得性艰难梭菌感染、社区获得性艰难梭菌感染以及产毒和非产毒艰难梭菌菌株定植患者中的核糖体型变异性。
Anaerobe. 2019 Dec;60:102086. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2019.102086. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
8
Clostridioides difficile colonization and infection in patients admitted for a first autologous transplantation: Incidence, risk factors, and patient outcomes.首次自体移植患者中艰难梭菌定植和感染:发生率、危险因素和患者结局。
Clin Transplant. 2019 Nov;33(11):e13712. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13712. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
9
Quantification of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile in feces of calves of different age and determination of predominant Clostridioides difficile ribotype 033 relatedness and transmission between family dairy farms using multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis.不同年龄犊牛粪便中艰难梭菌的定量分析,以及使用多位点可变数目串联重复序列分析确定主要的艰难梭菌核糖体分型033在家庭奶牛场之间的相关性和传播情况。
BMC Vet Res. 2018 Oct 1;14(1):298. doi: 10.1186/s12917-018-1616-8.
10
Community-acquired Clostridium difficile: epidemiology, ribotype, risk factors, hospital and intensive care unit outcomes, and current and emerging therapies.社区获得性艰难梭菌:流行病学、核糖体分型、危险因素、医院和重症监护病房结局以及现有和新兴治疗方法。
J Hosp Infect. 2018 Aug;99(4):436-442. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.01.015. Epub 2018 Mar 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Changes in the Epidemiology of Clostridioides difficile Infection.艰难梭菌感染的流行病学变化
Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2025 Sep 6. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2025.07.002.
2
Heterogeneity of Clostridioides difficile asymptomatic colonization prevalence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.艰难梭菌无症状定植患病率的异质性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gut Pathog. 2025 Jan 27;17(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s13099-024-00674-0.
3
Zoonotic bacteria in the vicinity of animal farms as a factor disturbing the human microbiome: a review.动物养殖场附近的人畜共患病细菌作为干扰人类微生物组的因素:综述。
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2024 May 20;37(2):138-152. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.02003. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
4
Screening for Asymptomatic Clostridioides difficile Carriage Among Hospitalized Patients: A Narrative Review.住院患者无症状艰难梭菌携带情况的筛查:一项叙述性综述
Infect Dis Ther. 2023 Sep;12(9):2223-2240. doi: 10.1007/s40121-023-00856-4. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
5
Overview of current detection methods and microRNA potential in infection screening. 感染筛查中当前检测方法和 microRNA 潜力概述。
World J Gastroenterol. 2023 Jun 14;29(22):3385-3399. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i22.3385.
6
Transmission Dynamics of Clostridioides difficile in 2 High-Acuity Hospital Units.艰难梭菌在 2 个高急症病房单元中的传播动力学。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Jan 29;72(Suppl 1):S1-S7. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1580.
7
Clostridioides difficile Whole-genome Sequencing Differentiates Relapse With the Same Strain From Reinfection With a New Strain.艰难梭菌全基因组测序可区分同一菌株复发与新菌株再感染。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Mar 1;72(5):806-813. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa159.

本文引用的文献

1
Clostridium difficile Screening for Colonization During an Outbreak Setting.艰难梭菌定植筛查在暴发疫情期间的应用
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Nov 28;67(12):1912-1914. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy455.
2
Zoonotic Transfer of Clostridium difficile Harboring Antimicrobial Resistance between Farm Animals and Humans.动物源性艰难梭菌耐药菌株在动物与人之间的传播
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Feb 22;56(3). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01384-17. Print 2018 Mar.
3
Recreational sandboxes for children and dogs can be a source of epidemic ribotypes of Clostridium difficile.儿童和宠物使用的娱乐性沙箱可能是艰难梭菌流行核糖型的一个来源。
Zoonoses Public Health. 2018 Feb;65(1):88-95. doi: 10.1111/zph.12374. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
4
Identification of novel risk factors for community-acquired Clostridium difficile infection using spatial statistics and geographic information system analyses.使用空间统计和地理信息系统分析确定社区获得性艰难梭菌感染的新风险因素。
PLoS One. 2017 May 16;12(5):e0176285. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176285. eCollection 2017.
5
Asymptomatic Carriers Contribute to Nosocomial Clostridium difficile Infection: A Cohort Study of 4508 Patients.无症状携带者导致医院内艰难梭菌感染:4508 例患者的队列研究。
Gastroenterology. 2017 Apr;152(5):1031-1041.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.12.035. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
6
Household Transmission of Clostridium difficile to Family Members and Domestic Pets.艰难梭菌在家中向家庭成员和家养宠物的传播。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016 Nov;37(11):1342-1348. doi: 10.1017/ice.2016.178.
7
More than 50% of Clostridium difficile Isolates from Pet Dogs in Flagstaff, USA, Carry Toxigenic Genotypes.美国弗拉格斯塔夫宠物狗体内超过50%的艰难梭菌分离株携带产毒基因型。
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 10;11(10):e0164504. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164504. eCollection 2016.
8
Clostridium difficile in Food and Animals: A Comprehensive Review.食品和动物中的艰难梭菌:全面综述
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;932:65-92. doi: 10.1007/5584_2016_27.
9
Burden of Clostridium difficile infection in the United States.美国艰难梭菌感染的负担
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 11;372(24):2369-70. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1505190.
10
Colonization with toxinogenic C. difficile upon hospital admission, and risk of infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.入院时产毒艰难梭菌定植与感染风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Mar;110(3):381-90; quiz 391. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.22. Epub 2015 Mar 3.

入院时环境因素与产毒艰难梭菌携带的相关性研究。

Association Between Environmental Factors and Toxigenic Clostridioides difficile Carriage at Hospital Admission.

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.

Collaborative for Healthcare Delivery Science, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1919132. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19132.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19132
PMID:31922563
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6991319/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Clostridioides difficile infection is the most frequent health care-associated infection in the United States. However, exposure to this organism might occur outside the health care setting.

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether exposure to environmental factors, such as livestock farms, is associated with a higher probability of being colonized with C difficile at hospital admission.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted from May 1, 2017, to June 30, 2018, at a teaching-affiliated hospital in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. All consecutive patients underwent C difficile screening using a nucleic acid amplification test at hospital admission. Data analyses were performed from July 2018 to October 2019.

EXPOSURES

The distances from patient residence to the nearest livestock farms, meat processing plants, raw materials services, and sewage facilities were measured in addition to risk factors previously evaluated in other studies.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The main outcome was a positive result on C difficile screening tests performed within 72 hours of hospital admission.

RESULTS

A total of 3043 patients admitted to the hospital were included in the final analysis. Of those, 1564 (51.4%) were women and 2074 (68.9%) were white, with a mean (SD) age of 62.0 (15.9) years; 978 patients (32.1%) were admitted to hematology-oncology units. At first admission, 318 patients (10.4%) were detected through testing as C difficile carriers. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed on a stratified sample of patients based on hematology-oncology admission status. These analyses indicated that although patients admitted to hematology-oncology units were 35% more likely to be colonized with C difficile, no significant association existed between their sociodemographic and economic characteristics or health care and environmental exposures and the likelihood of a positive C difficile test result. In contrast, among patients admitted to non-hematology-oncology units, comorbidities increased the likelihood for colonization by more than 4 times; women had 60% greater colonization than men, and a history of recent hospitalization (ie, within the preceding 6 months) increased the likelihood of colonization by 70%. Residential proximity to livestock farms were all significantly associated with a higher likelihood of a positive C difficile test result. Residential proximity to livestock farms more than doubled the probability of C difficile colonization in patients admitted to non-hematology-oncology units.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

A shorter distance between residence and livestock farms was associated with C difficile colonization. Knowledge of the epidemiology of C difficile in the community surrounding the hospital is important, as it has potential implications for the incidence of hospital-onset C difficile infection.

摘要

重要性

艰难梭菌感染是美国最常见的与医疗保健相关的感染。然而,这种生物体的暴露可能发生在医疗保健环境之外。

目的

研究接触环境因素(如牲畜养殖场)是否与入院时更有可能被艰难梭菌定植相关。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项回顾性队列研究,于 2017 年 5 月 1 日至 2018 年 6 月 30 日在威斯康星州密尔沃基的一所教学附属医院进行。所有连续入院的患者在入院时均使用核酸扩增试验进行艰难梭菌筛查。数据分析于 2018 年 7 月至 2019 年 10 月进行。

暴露

除了其他研究中已经评估过的危险因素外,还测量了患者居住地与最近的牲畜养殖场、肉类加工厂、原材料服务和污水处理设施的距离。

主要结果和措施

主要结果是在入院后 72 小时内进行的艰难梭菌筛查检测呈阳性。

结果

共纳入 3043 名入院患者进行最终分析。其中,1564 名(51.4%)为女性,2074 名(68.9%)为白人,平均(SD)年龄为 62.0(15.9)岁;978 名患者(32.1%)被收入血液科-肿瘤病房。初次入院时,通过检测发现 318 名(10.4%)患者为艰难梭菌携带者。对基于血液科-肿瘤病房入院状态的患者进行分层样本的多变量逻辑回归分析。这些分析表明,尽管入住血液科-肿瘤病房的患者感染艰难梭菌的可能性增加了 35%,但他们的社会人口统计学和经济特征或医疗保健和环境暴露与阳性艰难梭菌检测结果的可能性之间没有显著关联。相比之下,在非血液科-肿瘤病房住院的患者中,合并症使定植的可能性增加了 4 倍以上;女性比男性更容易定植,且最近住院(即入院前 6 个月内)会使定植的可能性增加 70%。居住地与牲畜养殖场的距离均与阳性艰难梭菌检测结果的可能性显著相关。与非血液科-肿瘤病房住院患者相比,居住地与牲畜养殖场的距离越近,患者艰难梭菌定植的可能性就越高。了解医院周围社区中艰难梭菌的流行病学情况很重要,因为这可能对医院获得性艰难梭菌感染的发生率产生影响。