• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

法国使用催产素和人工破膜与剖宫产的关系。

Association of Oxytocin Use and Artificial Rupture of Membranes With Cesarean Delivery in France.

机构信息

Port-Royal Maternity Unit, Department of Obstetrics, Cochin Broca Hôtel-Dieu Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, and INSERM UMR 1153, Obstetrical, Perinatal and Paediatric Epidemiology Research Team (Epopé), Centre for Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité (CRESS), DHU Risks in Pregnancy, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Feb;135(2):436-443. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003618.

DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000003618
PMID:31923058
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether the decrease in the frequency of oxytocin administration and artificial rupture of membranes observed between the 2010 and 2016 French Perinatal Surveys was associated with a change in the frequency of cesarean delivery or cesarean delivery indications among women who entered labor spontaneously.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included women who participated in the 2010 and 2016 French National surveys who had singleton pregnancies and who gave birth at at least 37 weeks of gestation after spontaneous labor to a liveborn neonate in cephalic presentation. To test whether the observed decrease of oxytocin administration and artificial rupture of membranes between the two study years was explained by the women's individual characteristics and maternity units' organizational characteristics change, multivariable analyses were performed. The same strategy was applied for the change in intrapartum cesarean delivery rates between the 2 years. These analyses were repeated in nulliparous, low obstetric risk women, multiparous low obstetric risk women, and women with a previous cesarean delivery. The cesarean delivery indications were compared in 2010 and 2016.

RESULTS

Oxytocin administration decreased significantly from 58.3% in 2010 to 45.2% in 2016 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.51; 95% CI 0.47-0.55), as did artificial rupture of membranes, from 52.4% to 42.6% (aOR 0.66; 95% CI 0.62-0.71). The intrapartum cesarean delivery rate remained stable-6.9% compared with 6.6% (aOR 0.93; 95% CI 0.82-1.06). The same patterns were observed in low risk groups and women with a previous cesarean delivery. The cesarean delivery indications were similar in both years.

CONCLUSION

The significant decrease in oxytocin administration and artificial rupture of membranes in 2016 compared with 2010 was not accompanied by an increase in the intrapartum cesarean delivery rate for women in France who entered labor spontaneously. These results support the recent international guidelines.

摘要

目的

评估 2010 年至 2016 年法国围产儿调查中催产素使用频率和人工破膜频率的下降是否与自发性临产妇女剖宫产率或剖宫产指征的变化有关。

方法

本横断面研究纳入了参加 2010 年和 2016 年法国全国调查的单胎妊娠、至少 37 周自发性临产、头位分娩的活产新生儿的妇女。为了检验这两年间观察到的催产素使用和人工破膜减少是否可以用妇女个体特征和产科单位组织特征的变化来解释,我们进行了多变量分析。同样的策略也应用于这两年间产时剖宫产率的变化。在初产妇、低产科风险妇女、多产妇、低产科风险妇女和有剖宫产史的妇女中重复了这些分析。比较了 2010 年和 2016 年的剖宫产指征。

结果

催产素使用率从 2010 年的 58.3%显著下降至 2016 年的 45.2%(调整后的优势比[aOR]0.51;95%置信区间[CI]0.47-0.55),人工破膜率从 52.4%降至 42.6%(aOR 0.66;95%CI 0.62-0.71)。产时剖宫产率保持稳定-6.9%与 6.6%(aOR 0.93;95%CI 0.82-1.06)。低危组和有剖宫产史的妇女也呈现相同的模式。两年间剖宫产指征相似。

结论

与 2010 年相比,2016 年催产素使用和人工破膜显著减少,但法国自发性临产妇女的产时剖宫产率并未增加。这些结果支持最近的国际指南。

相似文献

1
Association of Oxytocin Use and Artificial Rupture of Membranes With Cesarean Delivery in France.法国使用催产素和人工破膜与剖宫产的关系。
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Feb;135(2):436-443. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003618.
2
Association between provider type and cesarean birth in healthy nulliparous laboring women: A retrospective cohort study.健康初产妇分娩时医疗服务提供者类型与剖宫产之间的关联:一项回顾性队列研究。
Birth. 2018 Jun;45(2):159-168. doi: 10.1111/birt.12334. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
3
Associations Among Intrapartum Interventions and Cesarean Birth in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women with Spontaneous Onset of Labor.低危初产妇自发性临产时产程中干预措施与剖宫产的关系。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020 Jan;65(1):142-148. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12975. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
4
Maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with induction of labor after one previous cesarean delivery: A French retrospective study.一胎剖宫产术后再次行引产与母婴结局的相关性:一项法国回顾性研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 7;15(8):e0237132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237132. eCollection 2020.
5
The association between delayed amniotomy and adverse outcomes in labor induction.引产时延迟破膜与不良结局之间的关联。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Apr;247:85-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.02.002. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
6
Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes Associated with Amniotomy among Nulliparous Women Undergoing Labor Induction at Term.足月行引产的初产妇行羊膜腔穿刺术与母婴结局的相关性。
Am J Perinatol. 2021 Aug;38(S 01):e239-e248. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1709464. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
7
Impact of recommended changes in labor management for prevention of the primary cesarean delivery.推荐的产程管理改变对预防初次剖宫产的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Mar;218(3):341.e1-341.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.228. Epub 2017 Dec 29.
8
Frequency and determinants of misuse of augmentation of labor in France: A population-based study.法国产程干预滥用的频率及其决定因素:一项基于人群的研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 9;16(2):e0246729. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246729. eCollection 2021.
9
Variation of intrapartum care and cesarean rates among practitioners attending births of low-risk, nulliparous women.低危初产妇分娩中不同从业者的产时照护和剖宫产率变化。
Birth. 2020 Jun;47(2):227-236. doi: 10.1111/birt.12483. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
10
Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term.足月选择性引产的母婴结局。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Mar;220(3):273.e1-273.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.01.223. Epub 2019 Feb 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Labor patterns of spontaneous first-stage labor in Chinese women with normal neonatal outcomes.中国正常新生儿结局孕妇自发性第一产程的产程模式。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 3;19(7):e0305243. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305243. eCollection 2024.