Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, AP-HP, Antoine Béclère Hospital, University Paris Saclay, Clamart, France.
Midwifery School of Baudelocque, Paris-Descartes University, AP-HP, DHU Risks in Pregnancy, Paris, France.
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 7;15(8):e0237132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237132. eCollection 2020.
The safety of methods of labor induction in women with previous cesarean deliveries is still debated. We investigated perinatal outcomes associated with labor induction among women with a trial of labor after one cesarean delivery.
This retrospective study included 339 women with a trial of labor after one prior cesarean and a singleton term fetus in cephalic presentation in 2013-2016 in a French maternity unit. Labor induction was performed with oxytocin, artificial rupture of membranes and/or prostaglandin E2, according to the Bishop score. The primary outcome was a composite of uterine rupture, low Apgar score, neonatal resuscitation or admission to a neonatal unit. The secondary outcomes included cesarean delivery after onset of labor, postpartum hemorrhage and maternal hospital stay after delivery. We used logistic regression to estimate odds ratios adjusted (aOR) for potential confounders.
In our sample, 67.3% of women had spontaneous labor and 32.7% were induced. More than half of the women received oxytocin during labor regardless of the mode of labor. The proportions of the composite outcome and of cesarean after onset of labor were higher in the induced group compared to the spontaneous group (26.1% vs 15.8%, p = 0.02 and 45.0% vs 27.6%, p<0.01, respectively). There were 9 uterine ruptures (2.6%) and this proportion was higher in the induced group compared to the spontaneous group, although this difference was not statistically significant (3.6% vs 2.2%, p = 0.48). After adjustment, labor induction was associated with higher risks of the composite outcome (aOR = 2.45, 95% CI: 1.29-4.65), cesarean after onset of labor (aOR = 2.06, 95% CI: 1.15-3.68) and maternal hospital stay after delivery ≥6 days (aOR = 6.20, 95% CI: 3.25-11.81). No association was found with postpartum hemorrhage.
Labor induction after one prior cesarean was associated with a higher risk of adverse perinatal outcome. Nevertheless, the higher proportion of uterine rupture did not differ significantly from that in the spontaneous labor group.
在有剖宫产史的妇女中,引产方法的安全性仍存在争议。我们研究了与首次剖宫产术后试产相关的围产期结局。
这是一项回顾性研究,纳入了 2013 年至 2016 年期间在法国一家产科单位中进行首次剖宫产术后试产且单胎足月头位的 339 例妇女。根据 Bishop 评分,采用缩宫素、人工破膜和/或前列腺素 E2 进行引产。主要结局为子宫破裂、新生儿低 Apgar 评分、新生儿复苏或转入新生儿病房的复合结局。次要结局包括产程发动后的剖宫产、产后出血和产后住院时间。我们使用逻辑回归估计调整了潜在混杂因素的比值比(aOR)。
在我们的样本中,67.3%的妇女自发性临产,32.7%的妇女引产。无论产程发动方式如何,超过一半的妇女在产程中接受了缩宫素。与自发性临产组相比,引产组复合结局和产程发动后的剖宫产率更高(26.1%比 15.8%,p=0.02;45.0%比 27.6%,p<0.01)。有 9 例子宫破裂(2.6%),引产组高于自发性临产组,但差异无统计学意义(3.6%比 2.2%,p=0.48)。调整后,引产与复合结局(aOR=2.45,95%CI:1.29-4.65)、产程发动后的剖宫产(aOR=2.06,95%CI:1.15-3.68)和产后住院时间≥6 天(aOR=6.20,95%CI:3.25-11.81)的风险增加相关。与产后出血无关联。
首次剖宫产术后引产与不良围产期结局风险增加相关。然而,子宫破裂的比例高于自发性临产组,但差异无统计学意义。