Suppr超能文献

观察者协议在急性缺血性脑卒中的计算机断层灌注成像中的应用。

Observer Agreement on Computed Tomography Perfusion Imaging in Acute Ischemic Stroke.

机构信息

From the Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland (S.E.-T., K.W.M.).

Division of Neuroimaging Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, United Kingdom (G.M.).

出版信息

Stroke. 2019 Nov;50(11):3108-3114. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.026238. Epub 2019 Sep 25.

Abstract

Background and Purpose- Computed tomography (CT) perfusion (CTP) provides potentially valuable information to guide treatment decisions in acute stroke. Assessment of interobserver reliability of CTP has, however, been limited to small, mostly single center studies. We performed a large, internet-based study to assess observer reliability of CTP interpretation in acute stroke. Methods- We selected 24 cases from the IST-3 (Third International Stroke Trial), ATTEST (Alteplase Versus Tenecteplase for Thrombolysis After Ischaemic Stroke), and POSH (Post Stroke Hyperglycaemia) studies to illustrate various perfusion abnormalities. For each case, observers were presented with noncontrast CT, maps of cerebral blood volume, cerebral blood flow, mean transit time, delay time, and thresholded penumbra maps (dichotomized into penumbra and core), together with a short clinical vignette. Observers used a structured questionnaire to record presence of perfusion deficit, its extent compared with ischemic changes on noncontrast CT, and an Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score for noncontrast CT and CTP. All images were viewed, and responses were collected online. We assessed observer agreement with Krippendorff-α. Intraobserver agreement was assessed by inviting observers who reviewed all scans for a repeat review of 6 scans. Results- Fifty seven observers contributed to the study, with 27 observers reviewing all 24 scans and 17 observers contributing repeat readings. Interobserver agreement was good to excellent for all CTP. Agreement was higher for perfusion maps compared with noncontrast CT and was higher for mean transit time, delay time, and penumbra map (Krippendorff-α =0.77, 0.79, and 0.81, respectively) compared with cerebral blood volume and cerebral blood flow (Krippendorff-α =0.69 and 0.62, respectively). Intraobserver agreement was fair to substantial in the majority of readers (Krippendorff-α ranged from 0.29 to 0.80). Conclusions- There are high levels of interobserver and intraobserver agreement for the interpretation of CTP in acute stroke, particularly of mean transit time, delay time, and penumbra maps.

摘要

背景与目的-计算机断层扫描(CT)灌注(CTP)为指导急性脑卒中的治疗决策提供了有价值的信息。然而,CTP 的观察者间可靠性评估仅限于小型的、主要是单中心的研究。我们进行了一项大型的、基于互联网的研究,以评估急性脑卒中 CTP 解读的观察者间可靠性。方法-我们从 IST-3(第三次国际脑卒中试验)、ATTEST(急性缺血性脑卒中溶栓后阿替普酶与替奈普酶的比较)和 POSH(脑卒中后高血糖)研究中选择了 24 例病例,以说明各种灌注异常。对于每个病例,观察者都可以看到非对比 CT、脑血容量图、脑血流图、平均通过时间图、延迟时间图和阈值半影图(分为半影区和核心区),以及简短的临床描述。观察者使用结构化问卷记录灌注缺损的存在、与非对比 CT 上的缺血改变相比的程度,以及非对比 CT 和 CTP 的阿尔伯塔卒中项目早期 CT 评分。所有图像均在线查看,并在线收集响应。我们使用克里普多夫-α评估观察者间的一致性。通过邀请观察者对所有扫描进行重复审查,来评估观察者内的一致性。结果-57 名观察者参与了这项研究,其中 27 名观察者审查了所有 24 例扫描,17 名观察者贡献了重复阅读。所有 CTP 的观察者间一致性均为良好至优秀。与非对比 CT 相比,灌注图的一致性更高,而与脑血容量和脑血流相比,平均通过时间图、延迟时间图和半影图的一致性更高(克里普多夫-α分别为 0.77、0.79 和 0.81)。(克里普多夫-α分别为 0.69 和 0.62)。大多数读者的观察者内一致性为中等至良好(克里普多夫-α范围为 0.29 至 0.80)。结论-急性脑卒中 CTP 解读的观察者间和观察者内一致性较高,尤其是平均通过时间图、延迟时间图和半影图。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e1c/6824508/f2d4f9408c10/str-50-3108-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验