Kim Mi Eun, Jun Ji Hee, Hur Muyng Haeng
Department of Nursing, Jeonju University, Jeonju, Korea.
Division of Clinical Medicine, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2019 Dec;49(6):655-676. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2019.49.6.655.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of aromatherapy on sleep quality. METHODS: This is a systematic review of randomized controlled trial studies (PROSPERO registration number CRD42017064519). In this study, the PICO were adults and the elderly, aromatherapy intervention, a comparative intervention with the control and placebo oil groups, and sleep. The selected articles were in English, Korean, and Chinese. RESULTS: The results of the meta-analysis showed that the effect sizes of the experimental group were 1.03 (n=763, SMD=1.03, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.39) (Z=5.47, <.001). In the aromatherapy intervention group, the effect size of sleep was statistically significant (Q=9.39, df=2, =.009), with a difference of 0.77 for inhalation, 1.12 for oral intake and 2.05 for massage. A post-analysis showed that the effect of massage on sleep was significantly greater than the inhalation method. The regression coefficient of the intervention period, B=0.01 (Z=1.43, =.154), also showed that the longer the intervention period, the larger the effect size; however, it was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: A total of 23 literature analyses showed that aromatherapy is effective in improving quality of sleep, and the massage method is more effective in improving quality of sleep than the inhalation method. A meta-ANOVA showed that the aromatherapy intervention affected the high heterogeneity of the effect size. Thus, future research with stricter control in methods and experimental procedures is necessary.
目的:本研究旨在探讨芳香疗法对睡眠质量的影响。 方法:这是一项对随机对照试验研究的系统评价(PROSPERO注册号CRD42017064519)。在本研究中,PICO分别为成年人和老年人、芳香疗法干预、与对照组和安慰剂油组的比较干预以及睡眠。所选文章为英文、韩文和中文。 结果:荟萃分析结果显示,实验组的效应量为1.03(n = 763,标准化均数差[SMD]=1.03,95%置信区间[CI]为0.66至1.39)(Z = 5.47,P <.001)。在芳香疗法干预组中,睡眠的效应量具有统计学意义(Q = 9.39,自由度df = 2,P =.009),吸入法的效应量为0.77,口服法为1.12,按摩法为2.05。事后分析表明,按摩对睡眠的效果显著大于吸入法。干预期的回归系数B = 0.01(Z = 1.43,P =.154),也表明干预期越长,效应量越大;然而,这在统计学上并不显著。 结论:总共23项文献分析表明,芳香疗法对改善睡眠质量有效,且按摩法在改善睡眠质量方面比吸入法更有效。荟萃方差分析表明,芳香疗法干预影响了效应量的高异质性。因此,未来有必要在方法和实验程序上进行更严格控制的研究。
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2019-12
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021-3-5
Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2019-3-8
J Altern Complement Med. 2015-2
Complement Ther Med. 2019-6-15
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2018-11
Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2022-6-30
BMC Complement Med Ther. 2022-7-14
Int J Ther Massage Bodywork. 2022-3-2
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021-4-30
Mo Med. 2019
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2016-12
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2016
Nurs Crit Care. 2015-7-27
J Altern Complement Med. 2015-7
Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2015-4-25
J Altern Complement Med. 2015-2
Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2014-8