Ishii Daisuke, Matsuno Naoto, Gochi Mikako, Otani Masahide, Shonaka Tatsuya, Takahashi Hiroyuki, Nishikawa Yuji, Yoshikawa Ryo, Obara Hiromichi, Miyamoto Kazutoshi, Furukawa Hiroyuki
Department of Surgery, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan.
Department of Pathology, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan.
Ann Transplant. 2020 Jan 14;25:e919920. doi: 10.12659/AOT.919920.
BACKGROUND Split-liver transplantation can be useful in situations of limited donor resources. However, novel preservation methods are required to help the recipient recover from severe ischemic reperfusion injury incurred due to receiving a relatively small liver graft. MATERIAL AND METHODS Our experiment was performed using porcine livers without warm ischemia time, assuming a brain-dead organ. We made porcine split-liver grafts by 75% liver resection at the back table and divided the specimens into 4 groups. Group 1 was preserved with simple cold storage after splitting (CS; n=3), Group 2 was preserved with hypothermic perfusion preservation (HMP) after splitting (SBP; n=3), Group 3 was preserved with HMP after splitting under perfusion preservation (SDP; n=4), and Group 4 had the whole liver perfused as control grafts (Whole Liver; n=3). To assess potential methods of preservation and their effects, all grafts were evaluated by an ex vivo isolated liver reperfusion model using diluted autologous blood. RESULTS Portal vein pressure resistances during reperfusion were low in Group3 (SDP). Hepatic artery pressure resistances during reperfusion were markedly higher in Group 1(CS) than in the other groups. The levels of AST and LDH were high and increased at 2 h after reperfusion in Group 1 (CS). The histological findings show that the liver cell structure was irregular in Group 1 (CS) but remained regular in Groups 2 (SBP) and 3 (SDP). Histological Suzuki scores were also significantly better in Groups 2 (SBP) and 3 (SDP) compared with Group 1 (CS). CONCLUSIONS Splitting the liver under machine perfusion preservation may help restore the function and reduce ischemia-reperfusion injury.
背景 活体肝移植在供体资源有限的情况下可能会有所帮助。然而,需要新的保存方法来帮助受体从因接受相对较小的肝移植而遭受的严重缺血再灌注损伤中恢复。材料与方法 我们的实验使用无热缺血时间的猪肝脏进行,假设为脑死亡器官。我们在后台通过75%肝切除制作猪活体肝移植,并将标本分为4组。第1组在分割后采用单纯冷藏保存(CS;n = 3),第2组在分割后采用低温灌注保存(HMP)(SBP;n = 3),第3组在分割后采用灌注保存下的HMP(SDP;n = 4),第4组将整个肝脏作为对照移植物进行灌注(全肝;n = 3)。为了评估潜在的保存方法及其效果,所有移植物均通过使用稀释自体血的体外离体肝再灌注模型进行评估。结果 再灌注期间第3组(SDP)的门静脉压力阻力较低。再灌注期间第1组(CS)的肝动脉压力阻力明显高于其他组。第1组(CS)再灌注2小时后AST和LDH水平较高且升高。组织学结果显示,第1组(CS)肝细胞结构不规则,而第2组(SBP)和第3组(SDP)保持规则。与第1组(CS)相比,第2组(SBP)和第3组(SDP)的组织学铃木评分也明显更好。结论 在机器灌注保存下分割肝脏可能有助于恢复功能并减少缺血再灌注损伤。