• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝脏影像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)2018版磁共振成像的观察者间一致性

Interobserver Agreement of Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2018.

作者信息

Abdel Razek Ahmed Abdel Khalek, El-Serougy Lamiaa Galal, Saleh Gehad Ahmad, Abd El-Wahab Rihame, Shabana Walaa

机构信息

From the Departments of Diagnostic Radiology.

Tropical Medicine, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura, Egypt.

出版信息

J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2020 Jan/Feb;44(1):118-123. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000945.

DOI:10.1097/RCT.0000000000000945
PMID:31939892
Abstract

AIM

This study aimed to assess the interobserver agreement of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2018 (LI-RADS v2018).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis was done for 119 consecutive patients (77 male and 42 female) at risk of hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent dynamic contrast MR imaging. Image analysis was done by 2 independent and blinded readers for arterial phase hyperenhancement, washout appearance, enhancing capsule appearance, and size. Hepatic lesions were classified into 7 groups according to LI-RADS v2018.

RESULTS

There was excellent interobserver agreement of both reviewers for LR version 4 (κ = 0.887, P = 0.001) with 90.76% agreement. There was excellent interobserver agreement for nonrim arterial phase hyperenhancement (κ = 0.948; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89-0.99; P = 0.001), washout appearance (κ = 0.949; 95% CI, 0.89-1.0; P = 0.001); and enhancing capsule (κ = 0.848; 95% CI, 0.73-0.97; P = 0.001) and excellent reliability of size (interclass correlation, 0.99; P = 0.001). There was excellent interobserver agreement for LR-1 (κ = 1.00, P = 0.001), LR-2 (κ = 0.94, P = 0.001), LR-5 (κ = 0.839, P = 0.001), LR-M (κ = 1.00, P = 0.001), and LR-TIV (κ = 1.00; 95% CI, 1.0-1.0; P = 0.001), and good agreement for LR-3 (κ = 0.61, P = 0.001) and LR-4 (κ = 0.61, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

MR imaging of LI-RADS v2018 is a reliable imaging modality and reporting system that may be used for standard interpretation of hepatic focal lesions.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估肝脏影像报告和数据系统2018版(LI-RADS v2018)磁共振成像(MR)的观察者间一致性。

对象与方法

对119例有肝细胞癌风险且接受动态对比增强MR成像的连续患者(77例男性和42例女性)进行回顾性分析。由2名独立且不知情的阅片者对动脉期强化、廓清表现、强化包膜表现及大小进行图像分析。根据LI-RADS v2018将肝脏病变分为7组。

结果

两位阅片者对LR 4版的观察者间一致性极佳(κ = 0.887,P = 0.001),一致性为90.76%。对于非边缘动脉期强化(κ = 0.948;95%置信区间[CI],0.89 - 0.99;P = 0.001)、廓清表现(κ = 0.949;95% CI,0.89 - 1.0;P = 0.001)、强化包膜(κ = 0.848;95% CI,0.73 - 0.97;P = 0.001)以及大小的可靠性极佳(组内相关系数,0.99;P = 0.001)。对于LR-1(κ = 1.00,P = 0.001)、LR-2(κ = 0.94,P = 0.001)、LR-5(κ = 0.839,P = 0.001)、LR-M(κ = 1.00,P = 0.001)和LR-TIV(κ = 1.00;95% CI,1.0 - 1.0;P = 0.001),观察者间一致性极佳,对于LR-3(κ = 0.61,P = 0.001)和LR-4(κ = 0.61,P = 0.001)一致性良好。

结论

LI-RADS v2018的MR成像为可靠的成像方式和报告系统,可用于肝脏局灶性病变的标准解读。

相似文献

1
Interobserver Agreement of Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2018.肝脏影像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)2018版磁共振成像的观察者间一致性
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2020 Jan/Feb;44(1):118-123. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000945.
2
Liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2018: Reliability and agreement for assessing hepatocellular carcinoma locoregional treatment response.肝脏影像报告和数据系统 (LI-RADS) v2018:评估肝细胞癌局部区域治疗反应的可靠性和一致性。
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2022 Nov;103(11):524-534. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2022.06.007. Epub 2022 Jul 2.
3
Does quantitative assessment of arterial phase hyperenhancement and washout improve LI-RADS v2018-based classification of liver lesions?动脉期增强程度和廓清率的定量评估是否能提高基于 LI-RADS v2018 的肝脏病变分类?
Eur Radiol. 2020 May;30(5):2922-2933. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06596-9. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
4
Interobserver and intermodality agreement of standardized algorithms for non-invasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in high-risk patients: CEUS-LI-RADS versus MRI-LI-RADS.高危人群肝细胞癌无创诊断标准化算法的观察者间和模态间一致性:CEUS-LI-RADS 与 MRI-LI-RADS。
Eur Radiol. 2018 Oct;28(10):4254-4264. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5379-1. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
5
Hepatic Steatosis Has No Effect in Diagnosis Accuracy of LI-RADS v2018 Categorization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in MR Imaging.肝脂肪变对 MRI 诊断 LI-RADS v2018 肝细胞癌分类的准确率没有影响。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2024 Jun;59(6):2060-2070. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27783. Epub 2021 Jun 13.
6
Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System: Discordance Between Computed Tomography and Gadoxetate-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Major Features.肝脏影像报告和数据系统:计算机断层扫描与钆塞酸二钠增强磁共振成像在检测肝细胞癌主要特征方面的不一致性
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2018 Jan/Feb;42(1):155-161. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000642.
7
Diagnostic Performance of LI-RADS Version 2018, LI-RADS Version 2017, and OPTN Criteria for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.LI-RADS 版本 2018、LI-RADS 版本 2017 和 OPTN 标准用于诊断肝细胞癌的性能比较。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Nov;215(5):1085-1092. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.22772. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
8
Diagnostic Performance of LI-RADS Version 2018 for Evaluation of Pediatric Hepatocellular Carcinoma.LI-RADS 版本 2018 用于评估小儿肝细胞癌的诊断性能。
Radiology. 2021 Apr;299(1):190-199. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021203559. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
9
Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System:: Substantial Discordance Between CT and MR for Imaging Classification of Hepatic Nodules.肝脏影像报告和数据系统:CT与MR在肝结节影像分类上存在显著差异。
Acad Radiol. 2016 Mar;23(3):344-52. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2015.11.002. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
10
What proportion of LI-RADS 5 observations reported in clinical practice do not meet LI-RADS 5 criteria?临床实践中报告的肝脏影像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)5类观察结果中,有多大比例不符合LI-RADS 5类标准?
Eur Radiol. 2022 May;32(5):3327-3333. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08389-5. Epub 2021 Nov 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Re-assessing the diagnostic value of the enhancing capsule in hepatocellular carcinoma imaging.重新评估强化包膜在肝细胞癌成像中的诊断价值。
J Liver Cancer. 2024 Sep;24(2):206-216. doi: 10.17998/jlc.2024.05.01. Epub 2024 May 8.
2
A Multicenter Assessment of Interreader Reliability of LI-RADS Version 2018 for MRI and CT.LI-RADS 版本 2018 用于 MRI 和 CT 的多中心读者间可靠性评估
Radiology. 2023 Jun;307(5):e222855. doi: 10.1148/radiol.222855.
3
Inter-observer agreement and accuracy of LI-RADS v2018 for differentiating tumor in vein from bland thrombus using gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
LI-RADS v2018 对钆塞酸增强磁共振成像鉴别静脉内肿瘤与单纯性血栓的观察者间一致性和准确性。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023 Aug;48(8):2557-2569. doi: 10.1007/s00261-023-03964-4. Epub 2023 May 29.
4
Interrater reliability and agreement of the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2018 for the evaluation of hepatic lesions.肝脏影像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)v2018用于评估肝脏病变的评分者间可靠性和一致性。
Pol J Radiol. 2022 Jun 13;87:e316-e324. doi: 10.5114/pjr.2022.117590. eCollection 2022.
5
Diagnostic accuracy and inter-reader reliability of the MRI Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (version 2018) risk stratification and management system.磁共振成像肝脏影像报告和数据系统(2018版)风险分层与管理系统的诊断准确性及阅片者间可靠性
SA J Radiol. 2022 May 19;26(1):2386. doi: 10.4102/sajr.v26i1.2386. eCollection 2022.
6
The value of the apparent diffusion coefficient value in the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2018.2018版肝脏影像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)中表观扩散系数值的价值
Pol J Radiol. 2022 Jan 17;87:e43-e50. doi: 10.5114/pjr.2022.113193. eCollection 2022.
7
Coronary artery disease imaging reporting and data system (CAD-RADS): what radiologists need to know?冠状动脉疾病成像报告和数据系统 (CAD-RADS):放射科医生需要了解什么?
Emerg Radiol. 2021 Dec;28(6):1185-1203. doi: 10.1007/s10140-021-01973-8. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
8
Increasing incidence of non-HBV- and non-HCV-related hepatocellular carcinoma: single-institution 20-year study.非乙型肝炎病毒和非丙型肝炎病毒相关性肝细胞癌发病率的增加:单机构 20 年研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2021 Jul 31;21(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12876-021-01884-5.
9
A novel computer-aided diagnostic system for accurate detection and grading of liver tumors.一种用于准确检测和分级肝肿瘤的新型计算机辅助诊断系统。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 23;11(1):13148. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91634-0.
10
Balloon occluded TACE (B-TACE) vs DEM-TACE for HCC: a single center retrospective case control study.球囊阻断经导管动脉化疗栓塞术(B-TACE)与 DEB-TACE 治疗肝细胞癌(HCC)的比较:单中心回顾性病例对照研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2021 Feb 3;21(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12876-021-01631-w.