Suppr超能文献

肝外胆管癌和胆囊癌术后辅助放疗与无放疗疗效的荟萃分析。

A meta-analysis of the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy versus no radiotherapy for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Radiotherapy & Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.

Institute of Radiotherapy & Oncology, Soochow University, Suzhou, China.

出版信息

Radiat Oncol. 2020 Jan 15;15(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13014-020-1459-x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy (ART) for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHCC) and gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) is unclear, with conflicting results from nonrandomized studies. We reported a meta-analysis to determine the impact of adjuvant radiotherapy on survival.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and CNKI databases were searched to identify clinical trials of postoperative ART versus no radiotherapy for EHCC and GBC. The obtained data were analyzed using RevMan 5.3 and Stata 14.0 statistical software. Differences between two groups were estimated by calculating the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

A total of 21 clinical trials involving 1465 EHCC and GBC patients were selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and included in this meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed the following: The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was higher in the ART group than in the no radiotherapy group (OR = 0.63; 95% CI = 0.50-0.81, p = 0.0002). The 5-year OS rate was significantly higher for those with lymph node-positive disease (OR = 0.15; 95% CI 0.07-0.35; p < 0.00001) and margin-positive disease (OR = 0.40; 95% CI 0.19-0.85; p = 0.02) in the ART group than in the no radiotherapy group. ART had a tendency to bring benefit to the 5-year OS of patients with margin-negative disease but the difference was not statistically significant (OR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.30-1,07, p = 0.08). The local recurrence rate was significantly lower in the ART group than in the no radiotherapy group (OR = 0.54; 95% CI = 0.38-0.76, p = 0.0004), and there was no significant difference in the distant metastasis rate between the two groups (OR = 1.33; 95% CI = 0.95-1.87, p = 0.10).

CONCLUSIONS

A meta-analysis of the existing study results showed that compared with no radiotherapy, ART is an effective postoperative treatment for EHCC and GBC.

摘要

目的

辅助放疗(ART)对肝胆管癌(EHCC)和胆囊癌(GBC)的益处尚不清楚,非随机研究的结果存在冲突。我们报告了一项荟萃分析,以确定辅助放疗对生存的影响。

方法

检索 PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane Library 和中国知网(CNKI)数据库,以确定术后 ART 与 EHCC 和 GBC 无放疗的临床试验。使用 RevMan 5.3 和 Stata 14.0 统计软件分析获得的数据。通过计算比值比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI)来估计两组之间的差异。

结果

根据纳入和排除标准,共选择了 21 项符合条件的临床试验,纳入了这项荟萃分析。荟萃分析显示:ART 组的 5 年总生存率(OS)高于无放疗组(OR=0.63;95%CI=0.50-0.81,p=0.0002)。淋巴结阳性疾病(OR=0.15;95%CI 0.07-0.35;p<0.00001)和切缘阳性疾病(OR=0.40;95%CI 0.19-0.85;p=0.02)患者的 5 年 OS 率在 ART 组明显更高。ART 有改善切缘阴性疾病患者 5 年 OS 的趋势,但差异无统计学意义(OR=0.57,95%CI 0.30-1.07,p=0.08)。ART 组的局部复发率明显低于无放疗组(OR=0.54;95%CI=0.38-0.76,p=0.0004),两组远处转移率无显著差异(OR=1.33;95%CI=0.95-1.87,p=0.10)。

结论

对现有研究结果的荟萃分析表明,与无放疗相比,ART 是 EHCC 和 GBC 术后的一种有效治疗方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/714c/6964081/75e97cdccb2d/13014_2020_1459_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验