ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, The University of Queensland, 4072, QLD, Brisbane, Australia.
Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, 4072, QLD, Brisbane, Australia.
Conserv Biol. 2020 Jun;34(3):733-742. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13461. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
Attempts to better understand the social context in which conservation and environmental decisions are made has led to increased interest in human social networks. To improve the use of social-network analysis in conservation, we reviewed recent studies in the literature in which such methods were applied. In our review, we looked for problems in research design and analysis that limit the utility of network analysis. Nineteen of 55 articles published from January 2016 to June 2019 exhibited at least 1 of the following problems: application of analytical methods inadequate or sensitive to incomplete network data; application of statistical approaches that ignore dependency in the network; or lack of connection between the theoretical base, research question, and choice of analytical techniques. By drawing attention to these specific areas of concern and highlighting research frontiers and challenges, including causality, network dynamics, and new approaches, we responded to calls for increasing the rigorous application of social science in conservation.
为了更好地理解做出保护和环境决策所处的社会环境,人们对人类社会网络的兴趣日益增加。为了提高社会网络分析在保护中的应用,我们对文献中应用这些方法的近期研究进行了回顾。在我们的综述中,我们寻找了在研究设计和分析中限制网络分析实用性的问题。2016 年 1 月至 2019 年 6 月期间发表的 55 篇文章中有 19 篇至少存在以下问题之一:分析方法的应用不充分或对不完整的网络数据敏感;应用统计方法时忽略了网络中的依赖性;或理论基础、研究问题和分析技术的选择之间缺乏联系。通过关注这些具体的关注点,并突出研究前沿和挑战,包括因果关系、网络动态和新方法,我们回应了呼吁,要求在保护中更严格地应用社会科学。