• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保护决策科学导论。

An introduction to decision science for conservation.

机构信息

Conservation Decisions Lab, Department of Forest and Conservation Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Conserv Biol. 2022 Feb;36(1):e13868. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13868. Epub 2022 Jan 28.

DOI:10.1111/cobi.13868
PMID:34856010
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9302662/
Abstract

Biodiversity conservation decisions are difficult, especially when they involve differing values, complex multidimensional objectives, scarce resources, urgency, and considerable uncertainty. Decision science embodies a theory about how to make difficult decisions and an extensive array of frameworks and tools that make that theory practical. We sought to improve conceptual clarity and practical application of decision science to help decision makers apply decision science to conservation problems. We addressed barriers to the uptake of decision science, including a lack of training and awareness of decision science; confusion over common terminology and which tools and frameworks to apply; and the mistaken impression that applying decision science must be time consuming, expensive, and complex. To aid in navigating the extensive and disparate decision science literature, we clarify meaning of common terms: decision science, decision theory, decision analysis, structured decision-making, and decision-support tools. Applying decision science does not have to be complex or time consuming; rather, it begins with knowing how to think through the components of a decision utilizing decision analysis (i.e., define the problem, elicit objectives, develop alternatives, estimate consequences, and perform trade-offs). This is best achieved by applying a rapid-prototyping approach. At each step, decision-support tools can provide additional insight and clarity, whereas decision-support frameworks (e.g., priority threat management and systematic conservation planning) can aid navigation of multiple steps of a decision analysis for particular contexts. We summarize key decision-support frameworks and tools and describe to which step of a decision analysis, and to which contexts, each is most useful to apply. Our introduction to decision science will aid in contextualizing current approaches and new developments, and help decision makers begin to apply decision science to conservation problems.

摘要

生物多样性保护决策具有挑战性,尤其是当涉及不同价值观、复杂多维目标、有限资源、紧迫性和高度不确定性时。决策科学包含了关于如何做出困难决策的理论以及广泛的框架和工具,使该理论具有实用性。我们旨在提高决策科学的概念清晰度和实际应用,以帮助决策者将决策科学应用于保护问题。我们解决了决策科学采用的障碍,包括缺乏决策科学的培训和意识;对常见术语和应用哪些工具和框架的混淆;以及错误地认为应用决策科学必须耗时、昂贵且复杂的印象。为了帮助在广泛而不同的决策科学文献中进行导航,我们澄清了常见术语的含义:决策科学、决策理论、决策分析、结构化决策和决策支持工具。应用决策科学不一定复杂或耗时;相反,它始于了解如何利用决策分析来思考决策的各个组成部分(即,定义问题、引出目标、开发替代方案、估计后果和进行权衡)。这最好通过应用快速原型制作方法来实现。在每个步骤中,决策支持工具都可以提供额外的见解和清晰度,而决策支持框架(例如,优先威胁管理和系统保护规划)可以帮助针对特定情况的决策分析的多个步骤进行导航。我们总结了关键的决策支持框架和工具,并描述了每个框架和工具最适合应用于决策分析的哪个步骤以及哪些情况下。我们对决策科学的介绍将有助于为当前方法和新发展提供背景,并帮助决策者开始将决策科学应用于保护问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7149/9302662/3738c1b0248d/COBI-36-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7149/9302662/ff4fc7365eba/COBI-36-0-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7149/9302662/27cce0aba4b3/COBI-36-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7149/9302662/3738c1b0248d/COBI-36-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7149/9302662/ff4fc7365eba/COBI-36-0-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7149/9302662/27cce0aba4b3/COBI-36-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7149/9302662/3738c1b0248d/COBI-36-0-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
An introduction to decision science for conservation.保护决策科学导论。
Conserv Biol. 2022 Feb;36(1):e13868. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13868. Epub 2022 Jan 28.
2
Effect of risk aversion on prioritizing conservation projects.风险规避对保护项目优先级排序的影响。
Conserv Biol. 2015 Apr;29(2):513-24. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12386. Epub 2014 Oct 18.
3
Creating conservation strategies with value-focused thinking.用价值为导向的思维制定保护策略。
Conserv Biol. 2023 Oct;37(5):e14109. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14109. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
4
Projecting biodiversity benefits of conservation behavior-change programs.预测保护行为改变项目的生物多样性效益。
Conserv Biol. 2022 Jun;36(3):e13845. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13845. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
5
Using the Value of Information to improve conservation decision making.利用信息价值改进保护决策。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2019 Apr;94(2):629-647. doi: 10.1111/brv.12471. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
6
Achieving conservation science that bridges the knowledge-action boundary.实现连接知识与行动边界的保护科学。
Conserv Biol. 2013 Aug;27(4):669-78. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12050. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
7
Untapped potential of collective intelligence in conservation and environmental decision making.保护和环境决策中集体智慧的未开发潜力。
Conserv Biol. 2019 Dec;33(6):1247-1255. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13335. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
8
Managing uncertainty in decision-making for conservation science.管理保护科学决策中的不确定性。
Conserv Biol. 2023 Dec;37(6):e14164. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14164. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
9
Cautioning against overemphasis of normative constructs in conservation decision making.警惕在保护决策中过度强调规范性结构。
Conserv Biol. 2019 Oct;33(5):1002-1013. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13298. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
10
Using strategic foresight to assess conservation opportunity.运用战略远见评估保护机遇。
Conserv Biol. 2014 Dec;28(6):1474-83. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12404. Epub 2014 Nov 7.

引用本文的文献

1
A control theory framework and in situ experimental platform for informing restoration of coral reefs.一个用于指导珊瑚礁恢复的控制理论框架和原位实验平台。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1038/s41559-025-02741-4.
2
Global Patterns and Drivers of Freshwater Fish Extinctions: Can We Learn From Our Losses?淡水鱼灭绝的全球模式与驱动因素:我们能从损失中吸取教训吗?
Glob Chang Biol. 2025 May;31(5):e70244. doi: 10.1111/gcb.70244.
3
New technology for an ancient fish: A lamprey life cycle modeling tool with an R Shiny application.古老鱼类的新技术:一种具有R Shiny应用程序的七鳃鳗生命周期建模工具。

本文引用的文献

1
Conservation lessons from taboos and trolley problems.禁忌和 trolley 问题中的保护经验教训。
Conserv Biol. 2021 Jun;35(3):794-803. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13618. Epub 2020 Oct 11.
2
Four Decades of Transformation in Decision Analytic Practice for Societal Risk Management.四十年的社会风险管理决策分析实践变革。
Risk Anal. 2021 Mar;41(3):491-502. doi: 10.1111/risa.13332. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
3
Integration of social and ecological sciences for natural resource decision making: challenges and opportunities.社会和生态科学的整合:自然资源决策的挑战与机遇。
PLoS One. 2025 May 14;20(5):e0323408. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323408. eCollection 2025.
4
Opportunities, research gaps, and risks in allogenic ecosystem engineer mimicry.同种异体生态系统工程师模仿中的机遇、研究空白和风险。
Conserv Biol. 2025 Aug;39(4):e70018. doi: 10.1111/cobi.70018. Epub 2025 Apr 7.
5
Prioritisation to prevent extinction.优先防止灭绝。
Camb Prism Extinct. 2023 Jan 18;1:e6. doi: 10.1017/ext.2023.3. eCollection 2023.
6
Quantitative support for the benefits of proactive management for wildlife disease control.对野生动物疾病控制的主动管理益处的定量支持。
Conserv Biol. 2025 Feb;39(1):e14363. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14363. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
7
Cumulative risk of future bleaching for the world's coral reefs.世界珊瑚礁未来白化的累积风险。
Sci Adv. 2024 Jun 28;10(26):eadn9660. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adn9660. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
8
Aligning data with decisions to address the biodiversity crisis.使数据与决策保持一致,以应对生物多样性危机。
PLoS Biol. 2024 Jun 11;22(6):e3002683. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002683. eCollection 2024 Jun.
9
An assessment of the state of conservation planning in Europe.欧洲保护规划现状评估。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 May 27;379(1902):20230015. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0015. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
10
The decision maker's lament: If I only had some science!决策者的哀叹:要是我能多懂点科学就好了!
Ambio. 2024 Jun;53(6):898-906. doi: 10.1007/s13280-024-01986-w. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
Environ Manage. 2019 May;63(5):565-573. doi: 10.1007/s00267-019-01141-2. Epub 2019 Feb 9.
4
Incorporate Indigenous perspectives for impactful research and effective management.纳入本土观点以开展有影响力的研究并进行有效管理。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2018 Nov;2(11):1680-1683. doi: 10.1038/s41559-018-0706-0.
5
A large-scale application of project prioritization to threatened species investment by a government agency.政府机构对受威胁物种投资进行大规模项目优先级排序。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 14;13(8):e0201413. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201413. eCollection 2018.
6
A road map for designing and implementing a biological monitoring program.设计和实施生物监测计划的路线图。
Environ Monit Assess. 2016 Jul;188(7):399. doi: 10.1007/s10661-016-5397-x. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
7
Benefits of integrating complementarity into priority threat management.将互补性纳入优先威胁管理的好处。
Conserv Biol. 2015 Apr;29(2):525-36. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12413. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
8
Six common mistakes in conservation priority setting.保护优先级设置中的六个常见错误。
Conserv Biol. 2013 Jun;27(3):480-5. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12051. Epub 2013 Apr 8.
9
Financial costs of meeting global biodiversity conservation targets: current spending and unmet needs.实现全球生物多样性保护目标的财政成本:当前支出和未满足的需求。
Science. 2012 Nov 16;338(6109):946-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1229803. Epub 2012 Oct 11.
10
Understanding and managing conservation conflicts.理解和管理保护冲突。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2013 Feb;28(2):100-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2012.08.021. Epub 2012 Oct 3.