Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, 04510, Mexico.
Biodiversity Institute, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, 66045, Mexico.
Ecol Lett. 2020 Mar;23(3):555-564. doi: 10.1111/ele.13453. Epub 2020 Jan 15.
Correlational ecological niche models have seen intensive use and exploration as a means of estimating the limits of actual and potential geographic distributions of species, yet their application to explaining geographic abundance patterns has been debated. We developed a detailed test of this latter possibility based on the North American Breeding Bird Survey. Correlations between abundances and niche-centroid distances were mostly negative, as per expectations of niche theory and the abundant niche-centre relationship. The negative relationships were not distributed randomly among species: terrestrial, non-migratory, small-bodied, small-niche-breadth and restricted-range species had the strongest negative associations. Distances to niche centroids as estimated from correlational analyses of presence-only data thus offer a unique means by which to infer geographic abundance patterns, which otherwise are enormously difficult to characterise.
相关性生态位模型作为一种估计物种实际和潜在地理分布范围的方法,已经得到了广泛的应用和探索,但它们在解释地理丰度模式方面的应用一直存在争议。我们基于北美繁殖鸟类调查(North American Breeding Bird Survey)对此进行了详细的测试。正如生态位理论和丰富的生态位中心关系所预期的那样,丰度与生态位中心距离之间的相关性大多为负相关。这些负相关关系在物种之间的分布并非随机的:陆生、非迁徙、小体型、小生态位宽度和小范围分布的物种具有最强的负相关关系。因此,从仅存在数据的相关性分析中估计的生态位中心距离,为推断地理丰度模式提供了一种独特的方法,否则这些模式很难被描述。