Buono Andrea, Mühlenhaus Annika, Schäfer Tabitha, Trieb Ann-Kristin, Schmeißer Julian, Koppe Franziska, Münzel Thomas, Anadol Remzi, Gori Tommaso
Kardiologie I, Universitätsmedizin Mainz and DZHK Standort Rhein-Main, 55128, Mainz, Germany.
J Clin Med. 2020 Jan 14;9(1):220. doi: 10.3390/jcm9010220.
We evaluate feasibility and reproducibility of post hoc quantitative flow ratio (QFR) measurements and their prognostic predictive power during long-term follow-up.
Between 2010 and 2012, 167 patients without angiographic evidence of significant stenoses were enrolled in a prospective registry. Of these patients, 96% presented 7 years follow-up data. QFR was measured post hoc by three certified investigators. QFR analysis was feasible in 71% of left anterior descending (LAD), 72% of left circumflex (LCX), and 61% of right (RCA) coronaries for a total of 350 measurements repeated in triplicate. Coefficients of variation were 2.1% for RCA and LCX, and 2.8% for the LAD (quartile coefficients of dispersion respectively 1.5, 1.4, and 1.3). QFR ≤0.80 was recorded in 25 patients (27 vessels, in 74% of the cases LAD). A total of 86 major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events were observed in 76 patients. QFR ≤0.80 in at least one of the three vessels was the strongest predictor of events (HR 3.14, 95%CI 1.78-5.54, p = 0.0001). This association was maintained in several sensitivity analyses.
QFR reproducibility is acceptable, even when analysis is performed post hoc. A pathological QFR is not rare in patients without angiographic evidence of significant stenosis and is a predictor of incident events during long-term follow-up.
In a post hoc analysis of 167 patients without evidence of angiographic significant stenosis, the presence of QFR value ≤0.80 in at least one of the three coronary vessels showed to be the strongest predictor of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events during long-term follow-up. QFR reproducibility have been shown to be acceptable among experienced operators.
我们评估事后定量血流比率(QFR)测量的可行性和可重复性,以及其在长期随访期间的预后预测能力。
2010年至2012年期间,167例无显著狭窄血管造影证据的患者被纳入一项前瞻性登记研究。其中,96%的患者提供了7年随访数据。由三名经过认证的研究人员事后测量QFR。在71%的左前降支(LAD)、72%的左旋支(LCX)和61%的右冠状动脉(RCA)中,QFR分析是可行的,总共进行了350次测量,每次测量重复三次。RCA和LCX的变异系数为2.1%,LAD为2.8%(四分位数离散系数分别为1.5、1.4和1.3)。25例患者(27支血管)记录到QFR≤0.80,其中74%的病例为LAD。76例患者共观察到86次主要不良心血管和脑血管事件。三根血管中至少有一根QFR≤0.80是事件的最强预测因子(HR 3.14,95%CI 1.78 - 5.54,p = 0.0001)。这种关联在多项敏感性分析中均保持不变。
即使进行事后分析,QFR的可重复性也是可以接受的。在无显著狭窄血管造影证据的患者中,病理性QFR并不罕见,并且是长期随访期间事件发生的预测因子。
在对167例无血管造影显著狭窄证据的患者进行的事后分析中,三根冠状动脉血管中至少有一根QFR值≤0.80被证明是长期随访期间主要不良心血管和脑血管事件的最强预测因子。在经验丰富的操作人员中,QFR的可重复性已被证明是可以接受的。