University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Neuroscience and BCN Neuroimaging Center, Postbox 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, the Netherlands; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Rob Giel Research center, CC72, Postbox 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, the Netherlands; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, University Center for Psychiatry, CC80, Postbox 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, the Netherlands.
University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Neuroscience and BCN Neuroimaging Center, Postbox 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, the Netherlands; University of Groningen, Department of Psychology, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, 9712 TS, the Netherlands.
Schizophr Res. 2020 Apr;218:283-291. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.12.018. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
Many individuals with severe mental disorders have difficulties in vocational and social functioning, which are regarded the most important outcomes, together with clinical symptoms. To understand the underlying mechanisms, research is increasingly focused on factors influencing functional outcomes. One established association has been shown between cognition and community functioning with negative symptoms as a possible mediator. Although it has been shown that negative symptoms consist of two subdomains, thus far negative symptoms have been assessed as one unitary construct. This study considers for the first time subdomains of negative symptoms as putative mediators (expressive deficits, amotivation) of the association between cognition (neuro- and social cognition) and functional outcome (living situation, occupation, social functioning). We expected that specific subdomains of negative symptoms (e.g. amotivation) would mediate the effect of cognition on specific functional outcomes (e.g. social functioning) independently from illness duration. To assess this, we included two independent cohorts, consisting of participants with different illness duration. These two independent cohorts consisted of patients with a recent-onset psychotic disorder: PROGR-S (first time treated; N = 1129) and GROUP (illness duration preferably <5 years; N = 1200). Using linear regression, mediation analyses were performed with two cognition domains (neurocognition and social cognition) as predictors, negative symptoms (Expressive deficits and Amotivation as indexed with items from the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale) as mediators and three measures of functional outcomes (living situation, occupation and social functioning) as outcome measures. The analyses were repeated with the same outcome measures three years later. Three main results were obtained. I) Both in the cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses, the associations of neurocognition (both cohorts) and social cognition (GROUP) with social functioning were mediated by amotivation. II) The association between cognition and living situation was mediated by Expressive deficits in one cohort (GROUP) but not in the cohort assessing first-episode psychosis (PROGR-S). III) The association between cognition and occupation was mediated by Amotivation in PROGR-S and by Expressive deficits in GROUP. CONCLUSION: The current results show a less robust mediating role for specific negative symptom domains regarding the associations of cognition with occupation and living situation that may depend on the duration of psychotic illness. However, Amotivation, mediates the association between cognition and social functioning, which holds true for patients experiencing a first-onset and patients with a longer illness duration alike. The results may have implications for the development of therapeutic approaches focusing on amotivation to improve social functioning. GENERAL SCIENTIFIC SUMMARY: This study stresses the importance of distinguishing subdomains of negative symptoms, cognition and functioning. Our results show that specific negative symptom dimensions mediate the effects of cognition on specific functional outcomes.
许多患有严重精神障碍的个体在职业和社会功能方面存在困难,这些被认为是最重要的结果,与临床症状一起。为了了解潜在的机制,研究越来越关注影响功能结果的因素。认知与社区功能之间的联系以及阴性症状作为可能的中介已经得到证实。尽管已经表明阴性症状包含两个亚领域,但迄今为止,阴性症状一直被评估为一个单一的结构。本研究首次考虑将阴性症状的亚领域作为认知(神经和社会认知)与功能结果(生活状况、职业、社会功能)之间关联的假定中介(表达缺陷、动机缺乏)。我们预计,阴性症状的特定亚领域(例如动机缺乏)将独立于疾病持续时间,调节认知对特定功能结果(例如社会功能)的影响。为了评估这一点,我们纳入了两个具有不同疾病持续时间的独立队列。这两个独立的队列包括首发精神病患者:PROGR-S(首次治疗;N=1129)和 GROUP(疾病持续时间最好<5 年;N=1200)。使用线性回归,使用两个认知领域(神经认知和社会认知)作为预测因子、阴性症状(使用阳性和阴性症状量表中的项目表示的表达缺陷和动机缺乏)作为中介以及三个功能结果测量指标(生活状况、职业和社会功能)作为结果测量指标进行中介分析。三年后,使用相同的结果测量指标重复了分析。获得了三个主要结果。I)在横断面和纵向分析中,神经认知(两个队列)和社会认知(GROUP)与社会功能的关联均由动机缺乏所介导。II)认知与生活状况之间的关联在一个队列(GROUP)中由表达缺陷介导,但在评估首发精神病的队列(PROGR-S)中没有。III)认知与职业之间的关联在 PROGR-S 中由动机缺乏介导,在 GROUP 中由表达缺陷介导。结论:目前的结果表明,特定阴性症状领域对认知与职业和生活状况之间关联的中介作用较弱,这可能取决于精神病的持续时间。然而,动机缺乏,调节认知与社会功能之间的关联,这对于经历首发和疾病持续时间较长的患者都适用。结果可能对关注动机缺乏以改善社会功能的治疗方法的发展具有重要意义。一般科学总结:本研究强调区分阴性症状、认知和功能的亚领域的重要性。我们的结果表明,特定的阴性症状维度调节认知对特定功能结果的影响。